Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Self-inflicted lung cancer vs Unwanted pregnancy by brutal rape: Which gets covered?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 05:29 PM
Original message
Self-inflicted lung cancer vs Unwanted pregnancy by brutal rape: Which gets covered?
That's what the Stupak amendment did yesterday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Anything that affects males more than females is covered
Any bet viagra is covered!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. this is really yucky- your post I mean
and pointless too.

unrecommended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. The truth can often be yucky
Edited on Sun Nov-08-09 05:32 PM by Nikki Stone1
Especially when you're a kid. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inspired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. I agree with you, Cali. Unrecommended. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lillypaddle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #14
23. Me too
Let's not pit illness against illness, medical procedure against another. Everyone should have their health care covered eventually. This OP is di visive in its premise. We are divided enough as it is. Unrec'd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. I am on your side but not a fan of this formulation

The problem is what isn't covered, not what is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I'm not a fan of a lot of what's been spewed about this topic on this board.
So, be it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Schema Thing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
6. Abortion in the case of rape is covered, isn't it?



Not that I disagree that it is sleazy to have included anti-abortion in the insurance equation at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
7. I thought it preserved the Hyde Amendment
And if so, rape is covered (as is incest and life of the mother).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. That's what I read, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. It expanded upon it.
Strips women of coverage for abortion that they previously had.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #13
29. As in people trying to retroactively file claims?
Sorry, no go for me on that argument. The can-o-worms is too deep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
etherealtruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
9. I am a strong advocate for a woman's right to choose ...
I am not a fan of demonizing those experiencing the fatal effects of addiction.

Both should be covered under any health plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
10. People shouldn't have to explain or justify how they got pregnant
or developed or contracted a disease. There is too much judgment inherent in it, and it isn't right or fair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frazzled Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
11. Both, technically
The Stupak amendment does permit federal funds for abortion in the case of rape, incest, and the life of the mother.
Sorry, but it so happens that that's what it says.

Right now, however, if you need insurance on the private market, you probably can't get it if you smoke. Definitely not if you have lung cancer. The new bill will ensure that no American can be turned down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
12. My reading and all stories that I've read about the Stupak
amendment... show that there are exceptions for covering abortions for rape, incest, and the life of the mother.

I don't like the amendment, I think every legal procedure should be covered, but lets not muddy the waters with misinformation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greennina Donating Member (295 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
15. There are more Republican smokers...
than there are women in the Republican party. That's why they don't care about us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek_sabre Donating Member (619 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
16. unrec'd...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MajorChode Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. That picture is fucking brilliant
I just stole it, BTW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
18. Pregnancy isn't a health problem. False equivalence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lars39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Pregnancy and childbirth can kill or permenently injure you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. *SARCASM* That's what those sluts get for having sex! *SARCASM*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
20. +1,000,000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
22. Oh, I see that the anti-choicer, forced birthers have found the UnR button.
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. My usual refrain: DU is infested with misogynists.
Edited on Sun Nov-08-09 06:32 PM by Odin2005
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lillypaddle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. I am hardly anti choice
nor a birther.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
etherealtruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #22
28. It couldn't possibly be that the situation presented is vile ....
... and many strong advocates of choice are also strong advocates of ANYONE requiring medical intervention receiving it, could it?

I am disgusted by many posts, of late, trivializing a woman's right to do as she deems necessary with her body ... my disgust will not cause me to lash out at other groups (i.e. those experiencing the fatal effects of addiction, obesity or anything else).

People with health-care needs should be able to receive health-care .... period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #22
30. Hi Hep. I am not anti-choice. I disagree with
the picture the OP paints. The bill does NOT say this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
27. Both
The amendment yesterday did nothing to restrict either. Despite your poutrage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC