Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

One small slice of judicial happiness for 2 guys in Wisconsin (Upbeat story)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 05:07 PM
Original message
One small slice of judicial happiness for 2 guys in Wisconsin (Upbeat story)
Edited on Sun Nov-08-09 05:13 PM by truedelphi
Two men who are citizens if Wisconsin filed a lawsuit against PepsiCo.

They claimed that before Pepsi brought out its bottled water, they had met with Pepsi executives and told them how profitable this would be.

They were told their idea had no merit.

Then Pepsi started bottling Aquafina water. The two guys decided to sue Pepsi. They submitted the legal claim and filings to the Pepsi office in the Carolinas, which is the proper action, as that is where Pepsi has its charter of incorporation.

Pepsi, though, operates out of somewhere in New York. They never received the legal papers, and thus were a "no show" at their trial. And the judge ruled for the two plaintiffs.

Thus the two plaintiffs were awarded a 1.26 billion dollar judgement against Pepsi.

Now PepsiCo has its feathers all ruffled skyward. How dare these men present the papers to their office in the Carolinas, just because that is what proper legal interpretation dictates?

Pepsi plans on stopping this action. I am sure it has enough moolah to buy out whatever judge it needs to buy out, but for the moment, those two guys must feel that victory is sweet.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sanity Claws Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Default judgment was vacated last week.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091106/ap_on_bi_ge/us_pepsico_no_show

Pepsico blamed its default on a legal secretary. Right. Sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Oh Damn and several other four letter words.
If my "inner secretary" fails to notice the paper work sent to me by someone suing me, I don't get a second chance.

Too bad for those guys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC