Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Stupak Biofuels Rider benefiting Michigan sneaked into Health Bill: Pork for his anti-choice crusade

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 04:34 PM
Original message
Stupak Biofuels Rider benefiting Michigan sneaked into Health Bill: Pork for his anti-choice crusade
Well, well, well. The stench is never far from the slime.



Jane Hamsher at Firedoglake spotlights this little gem:


Time For The Stupak Biofuels Rider to Come Out of Health Care Bill


November 8, 2009 8:46 am


I never got a satisfactory answer about why the biofuels rider suddenly went into the health care bill at the last minute. The reasons that were offered up were never satisfactory.

So, in the process of nosing around last night, I found out that the member of Congress who really, really cares about biofuels is — Bart Stupak:

Congressman Bart Stupak (D-Menominee) spoke today at the opening of a bio-fuel plant in Gladstone Michigan. The facility, which is being opened by AG Solutions Inc., is expected to produce more than 20 million gallons of biodiesel fuel per year from agriculture projects.The facility is the first biodiesel plant in Michigan, adding to the five existing ethanol producing plants that are already operating in the state.Speaking alongside Governor Jennifer Granholm (D-MI), Stupak used the event to call for a new direction in U.S. energy policy.


If he wants to lead an anti-choice revolt, it needs to come out. He shouldn’t be paid off for his attack on choice with a big huge piece of personal pork in the bill.




Firedoglake Action:



Call Bart Stupak’s Donor PACS and Tell Them They’re Paying For His Anti-Abortion Activism

Many of the companies listed have quite a bit of effort invested in women as clients/customers. That they are sending campaign money to the likes of anti-choice crusader Bart Stupak should enrage quite a large number of these women. And that will reap undesirable consequences for companies such as:


* AFLAC PAC (certainly benefit if women decide to buy private insurance rather than a public plan)
* AMAZON CORPORATE LLC SEPARATE SEGREGATED FUND (AMAZON.COM PAC)
* AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (AAJ PAC)
* AMERICAN HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE
* BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF MICHIGAN PAC (also stands to benefit from women clients)
* COMCAST CORPORATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE- FEDERAL (ladies, you have cable, yes?)
* DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY EMPLOYEES PAC (DOWPAC), THE
* FORD MOTOR COMPANY CIVIC ACTION FUND (Ford: Designed For “Pro-Life”)
* GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (GEPAC)
* GODADDY.COM INC., PAC
* HERBALIFE INTERNATIONAL INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (AKA HERBALIFEPAC)
* HOME DEPOT INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE, THE
* HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE
* HUMANA INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (and another….)
* JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC FEDERAL POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE
* RITE AID CORPORATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE
* SIEMENS CORPORATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE
* SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE
* T-MOBILE USA, INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (T-PAC)
* UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC. PAC
* VERIZON COMMUNICATION INC. GOOD GOVT CLUB
* WELLS FARGO AND COMPANY EMPLOYEE PAC (AKA WELLS FARGO EMPLOYEE PAC)




Some heavily applied pressure by women aimed at these companies would be noticed.


Why should women want to do business with companies that steer large amounts of campaign money into the coffers of woman-unfriendly politicians?



Indeed.




Ladies, they need to hear from you.









Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
johnfunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Needed: STRONG primary challenger to send Stupak back to the private sector
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. He's already done his damage
What he does now is unimportant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
highplainsdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamanaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. I seem to recall hearing, during the 2008 campaign, that the earmark
(pork) policy was going to change.

Looks like it's still going strong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. Makes me feel like my head is going to explode!!!!!!
:grr: :nuke: :grr: :nuke: :grr: :nuke: :nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. Some Repub on the floor was bitching about this
Also something about reimbursing Veterinarians?

That's the problem with these huge bills and their gigantic amendments. Anything could slip in that makes a HUGE impact in ways never anticipated. It's really a political "poison pill" for special interests.

The outlawing of the Line item veto for bills is a travesty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nightrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
7. knr. Good catch!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC