Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I think 39 democrats lacked the courage of their convictions

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:13 PM
Original message
I think 39 democrats lacked the courage of their convictions
If anyone would care to step forward to defend their votes, I am willing to listen. Saying they were scared does not carry much weight with me, however.

The Democrats who voted against the bill:
John Adler (NJ)
Jason Altmire (PA)
Brian Baird (WA)
John Barrow (GA)
John Boccieri (OH)
Dan Boren (OK)
Rick Boucher (VA)
Allen Boyd (FL)
Bobby Bright (AL)
Ben Chandler (KT)
Travis Childers (MS)
Artur Davis (AL)
Lincoln Davis (TN)
Chet Edwards (TX)
Bart Gordon (TN)
Parker Griffith (AL)
Stephanie Herseth Sandlin (SD)
Tim Holden (PA)
Larry Kissell (NC)
Suzanne Kosmas (FL)
Frank Kratovil (MD)
Dennis Kucinich (OH)
Jim Marshall (GA)
Betsy Markey (CO)
Eric Massa (NY)
Jim Matheson(UT)
Mike McIntyre (NC)
Michael McMahon (NY)
Charlie Melancon (LA)
Walt Minnick (ID)
Scott Murphy (NY)
Glenn Nye (VA)
Collin Peterson (MN)
Mike Ross (AR)
Heath Shuler (NC)
Ike Skelton (MO)
John Tanner (TN)
Gene Taylor (MS)
Harry Teague (NM)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. They are good, honest Democrats ... owned by the corporations
that pay them..

I would rather have them represent the corporations. The GOP candidates that ran against them are just as bad, if not worse..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
2.  Kucinich's explaination has already been posted. And it wasn't for fear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Dennis is the conscience of the Democratic Party
Good on him for not following the herd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. I didn't realize he was one of them
Still, he also knows Americans needed health care reform now. Not tomorrow. This is as urgent an issue as any we face in this country. Much more significant than bailing out banks and cutting taxes of the wealthy.

Unfortunately, there was no way to get any HEALTHCARE reform without EVERYONE compromising in our party. The question became who we ended up compromising with. Members of our OWN party (the Stupak amendment) or with Republicans (a NO vote). Sorry, much as I respect Kucinich, I think he made the wrong call here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Massa
the exact same. He is getting torn apart by all sides for wanting real health care reform that is in fact only opposed by people putting private profit above lives, above everything decent. And was there any question the remaining votes would be responsible for killing the bill?

In this bill, Blue Dogs get a lot and lose a foothold no matter how they voted. Progressives got a foothold and precious little else no matter how they voted but only they would get the ultimate punishment from both sides for any vote at all. And the corporate Dems still will get their money, WH support etc. The progressives will get eaten by their own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Glorfindel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. Make that 38 - Gene Taylor (my congressthing) has no convictions
He's the ultimate DINO. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sherman A1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. Would it be possible that they found
portions of the bill or perhaps the entire bill unacceptable? I am sure there are parts of the bill that you disagree with or would like to have changed, from the bit that I have read thusfar I know that I am not entirely pleased with it.

I will not criticize their votes until I know more about the bill and their reasoning.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Compromises were made...
This is what I am left to conclude (quoting myself from upthread):

Unfortunately, there was no way to get any HEALTHCARE reform without EVERYONE compromising in our party. The question became who we ended up compromising with. Members of our OWN party (the Stupak amendment) or with Republicans (a NO vote).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sherman A1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Of course
compromises were made. That is the nature of things, again I cannot criticize a persons vote without knowing more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. Kucinich defended his stand
and I applaud him for it. My assumption (and I could be wrong) is that he knew the votes were there to pass the bill and that he was safe in voting his conscience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. he ended up voting with Republicans
The ones who compromised on the Stupak amendment voited their consciences. They gave up something very real they believed in to pass something else they really believed in.

Kucinich took no risk. Sorry, I like Kucinich a lot. But I think this in this instance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pyrzqxgl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. Wouldn't it be nice to have token progressive primary opposition in all those races?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. If the district they serve is truly blood red, I dunno.
Edited on Sun Nov-08-09 03:28 PM by emulatorloo
I have mixed feelings -- I would like to see better democrats than some of these blue dogs.

However if the district is blood red, I would rather have a blue dog than a insane birther teabagger.

However some of the districts might be ready for a more progressive dem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
10. That, and they failed to represent their constituents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. Good point....someone voted Democratic not Republican
That was a mandate to vote with the rest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
15. I see 10 or 12 that do not live in very red districts?
Such as those in NY, OH, NM, MN, CO, MD, WA, and MD. So they must have another reason for voting against it other than afraid of their constituency? Or maybe their districts are very red, even though they don't live in the deep South?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. baird is a coward
No excuse for not voting with the others. His district is not all that red.

The gains may have been small, but they were a start--the first shot in a larger war. The fact that the Repubs and insurance companies fought it so hard was good enough reason for me to back it. The fact that they opposed it so vociferously speaks volumes. It's not everything I wanted, but it is some of the things I wanted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northernlights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
16. the bill started as a compromise on day 1
When Obama took single payer off the table instead of using it as a starting point.

This bill is a compromise of a compromise...and then compromised some more until it's just plain highway robbery.

I only hope that the penalty for refusing to buy health insurance isn't too high. Harvard Pilgrim made it clear 25 years ago that my life isn't worth a $10 CBC. I paid my own way then, have ever since, and prefer to continue that way. As long as I only have to pay a few hundred dollars/year for the right not to be forced to support CEOs in exchange for nothing, I'll manage until I can get the fuck out of here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. The same cost as medicare coverage. Anything more is unacceptable
Edited on Sun Nov-08-09 04:23 PM by Generic Other
That is still something. Now we have a leg to stand on to fight for more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC