Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Republicans ought to worry that the Dems passed abortion restrictions last night

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 02:01 PM
Original message
The Republicans ought to worry that the Dems passed abortion restrictions last night
Edited on Sun Nov-08-09 02:07 PM by eleny
I don't like the abortion amendment - at all.

But the anti Choice crowd has to gag down the fact that the Dems are the ones with the "big tent". Rep. Cao voted for the House bill because of the amendment initiated by the blue dogs. There's no denying that the Dems delivered to the "pro lifers".

I hate the amendment and want it stripped in conference. So we shouldn't raise it up a flagpole. But the politics of this makes the Republicans look like eunuchs. I believe it's why Steele wouldn't get off the subject of the governor races on tv this morning.

This is as much a thorn for them as for us since we literally stole their main family values issue from them. All but one Republican voted against the final bill last night. Oh, that's bad - very bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's a good point. I also wondered if, after this thing is passed -
assuming it passes - if there couldn't be a legal challenge about the abortion exclusion. After all, it is a legal procedure and even though it is an elective procedure, there are other elective procedures covered. For example, I might think circumcision is a waste of money, but that's covered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I'd be so bummed to see it remain but you make a good point
Edited on Sun Nov-08-09 02:16 PM by eleny
The fight to get it out would be huge and as you illustrate, complex.

The tough thing now is not being able to play up something that mightily cuts the Repukes off at the knees. I wonder how the blue dogs in that group play up their "accomplishment" of last night? Will they keep their interviews local? Surely FoxNews wouldn't be all that interested in cheering them.

This could be a huge dilemma for the right wing. Why bother voting Republican when they aren't the party that delivers the goods?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. On a side note, is it wrong for me to hope a whole lot of Republican
women who don't want kids get knocked up?:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Why would they stop now?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. no. the result would be lots of little republicans.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. P.S. Why wouldn't we call Republicans in the House and ask why they didn't vote for the bill?
Isn't it worth it to them to get abortion restrictions any way they can? Isn't the life of one "baby" worth it to them - huh,huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
6. The GOP think it will be stripped out when the Senate gets their
legislation and the two bills are reconsciled.

The Conservatives in Va are already asking their new governor
to make a similar law for state of VA. No state money for Abortions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Can you imagine if the tables were turned?
They'd be crowing and be damned with all the logic and finer points and details.

Today, they'd have us by the throat for failing to make progress toward passing some of the steepest restrictions to choice. They'd be howling from the rooftops how we turned our back on our base and *refused* to take the first step in advancing the saving of lives - the lives of babies.

You know how they play their hand. They'd take a pair of deuces and make it look like a royal flush.

Btw, we've had that restriction on public funds here in my state for many years. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DearAbby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
7. Maybe we should make it where
those who are unable to afford it, can go to a privately funded organization. Don't make Abortions illegal, just dont make it where it's federally funded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. That's a pretty steep restriction since it makes it so difficult for the poor
It sounds like you think it could be inevitable that this amendment will be passed by the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DearAbby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I do think it is inevitable.
Edited on Sun Nov-08-09 03:43 PM by DearAbby
people's views on abortion is changing, for whatever reasons. I would find it worse if it were banned completely, as the troglodytes want. The Senate is ultra conservative compared to the House. The House barely passed the health care bill by 5 votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. If that's going to happen then we should be bellowing from the rooftops how they spurned their base
In fact, they couldn't even deliver the 100% nay vote that they promised. They couldn't even intimidate the one fairly new Congressman who held out against that effort? How weak is that!?

I'm imagining how they would be framing the conversation today. They'd own us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 06:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC