Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

EVERY OTHER LIBERAL VOTED FOR THIS BILL!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 01:17 PM
Original message
EVERY OTHER LIBERAL VOTED FOR THIS BILL!
Don't you guys research before posting? The Dems who voted Nay were, save for Kucinich, ALL Conservative Democrats. Many of you are, without knowing it, castigating progressives and applauding Blue Dogs like Heath Shuler and Lincoln Davis, which you are perfectly in your right to do so--it's just odd.

Grayson voted Yea. Ellison voted Yea. Frank voted Yea. Waxman voted Yea. My congressman, as well as every other congressman in liberal New York City, voted Yea. When you say, "Let's primary everyone who voted for this!" you're throwing just about the entire party under the bus--a technique which worked so well for Republicans in last week's election. Are they not liberals anymore? Perhaps not, but it doesn't leave us with an awful lot of remaining representation--basically, Dennis Kucinich vs. the World.

My point? I'm still undecided on my support of the recent HRC House Bill, but I'm getting really annoyed with DU'ers inaccurately portraying the vote as Moderate sellouts vs. Liberal heroes, when it really was the Democratic Party vs. so-called "DINOS".

Plus Dennis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. My representative, an unabashed liberal in support of single-payer voted "Yea".
Edited on Sun Nov-08-09 01:20 PM by Barack_America
Why? Because our predominantly poor and underinsured district could not afford him not to.

Thank you, Rep. Fattah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Go2Peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
29. Yes, what a contrast to the "white hats" that represented us so well! Damn Kucinich!
Edited on Sun Nov-08-09 03:03 PM by Go2Peace
He took a calculated and PRINCIPLED stand. He never threatened the bill, he always fought and continues to fight hard for the poor and working classes. You do a disservice to TRUTH.

He should have behaved like the other part of the MAJORITY, and watered down reform against the wishes of the public? No, he did the right thing. We need people like him to keep the real goals clear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. Fox is touting the how close the vote was in the House..,
...In order to rally their troops for the Senate fight.

DK absolutely threatened this bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Go2Peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #31
42. I don't watch Fox. Why would you care what they say anyway?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gtar100 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. K&R - for clearing things up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aramchek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. Dennis is willing to let people die to prove a point. Where's the compassion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
POAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. It's personal for me in that
I can benefit from even this flawed bill.

Dennis, once my Mayor in Cleveland, might as well have looked me in the eye and said die because my principle trumps your life!

How many others would he sacrifice on the altar of purity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aramchek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. the Kucinich Altar of Purity... many here worship at it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. There is going to be alot of uninsured people dying between now and 2013
Single payer Now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aramchek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. 'Single Payer Now' accomplishes nothing at all
Not a damn thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tonysam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #14
52. Single-payer isn't going to happen, period, as long
as insurance companies are allowed to bribe politicians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProleNoMore Donating Member (316 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 05:03 AM
Response to Reply #52
57. Shear Defeatism - If That's What You Believe Then That Is What You Probably Will Get
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #10
32. Not true
the is a "high risk pool" available immediately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
16. So they are going to die anyway.
Mandated insurance to buy into a plan with a large deductible means people who can't afford health insurance will be using their food money to not only pay for premiums but they won't be able to go to the doctor anyway cause they can't afford either the deductible or co-pays if that kicks in. Subsidies won't cover the majority of working class Americans who will probably not qualify for them because they aren't poor enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. Who on earth suggested that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I came directly from an OP that said, quote: "I applaud the Democrats who voted against this bill."
And they then said, "Many of the people who voted for this bill will face fierce primary challenges, and who knows-maybe more progressive candidates will get their seats." Even though the MOST conservative Democrats voted NO!

It's just plain ignorance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
6. Kucinich voted with the Republicans, the Teabaggers, and the Birfers.
Hooray for Dennis.

His smug must keep him warm at night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. Well I wouldn't go that far. He is a good guy
My guess is he voted no to make a statement, and knew it was safe to do so because the Dems had the votes to pass it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #13
27. A vote is a Yes or a No
It's not an essay question.

I'm sure Michelle Bachmann's vote (the same as DK's, by the way) was meant as a statement too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
9. Keith Ellison, my rep, voted for it.
Edited on Sun Nov-08-09 01:37 PM by The Velveteen Ocelot
He's about as progressive a Democrat as there is right now. Collin Peterson, another Minnesota rep, voted against it, and he votes with Republicans so often that he might as well be one. I'm not crazy about the bill, but if the Republicans and the Blue Dogs hate it, there must be at least some good in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSPS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
11. Don't be silly
Just because republicans are against it doesn't mean it's good and we should support it. It's a horribly flawed bill that will, in fact, provide no better coverage than people can get today. In many ways, it will be worse.

The only beneficiary of this legislation is the private health insurance racket. All will be compelled by the federal government, one way or another using their own money or the taxpayer's, to buy a defective product -- private health insurance. There are too many loopholes and poison pills in the bill. What they call a "public option" isn't public at all. It is merely a ghetto for those whom the private insurers don't want to cover anyway, so it will fail miserably. In the industry, it's called an "adverse risk pool" and it just won't work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. If the private health insurance companies are so much better off, then the GOP
should love it, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSPS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #19
41. The GOP has said that they will not vote in favor of any democratic legislation of any kind.
Their main goal is to undermine Obama politically, so they'll vote against anything he proposes. It's no secret -- they've said this in public. In this case, they'll vote against any health care bill regardless of its content.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. So then it doesn't matter to them whether the bill is good or bad, right? NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #19
60. Good point ~ if the GOP is in bed with the Insurance Companies
They should be all over this Bill with YES.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
12. THANKS FOR THE REALITY CHECK.
Seriously - Kick and Rec
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
15. Oh, they know what they're doing
Those "Republican progressives" are not here to help, if you know what I mean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kid a Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
17. good point k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
18. AND THEY WERE WRONG! See, all-caps means it's true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. You're saying all the liberal Democrats that voted for this bill were wrong?
Please tell me you're just joking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Waiting For Everyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
20. Group-think much?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. I might ask you the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. It takes a lot of nerve to support liberal Democrats on a site dedicated to the Democratic Party huh
Group think much?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Waiting For Everyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #22
28. Oh, I get it. A minority can't possibly be right by definition. Hence my statement.
Yes, you'll get something (maybe). But you've been token-bribed into losing much more. And the bribe will be taken back very easily - because we smear those who stand up for us. Yep, that's a smart move alright.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #28
33. One-sided rationalizations won't win you any points with me - I'm not buying
Sorry, we could go back and forth on this, but I will have to just point you back to my original reply to you. It's the hypocrisy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Waiting For Everyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #33
37. I'm not buying that one person can't be right in disagreeing with many.
If you can't agree with that, then we can agree on nothing. Fine by me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. It's the hypocrisy
So if I give you the "one person can be right" argument, suddenly raging hypocrisy is OK?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Waiting For Everyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #38
44. What hypocrisy? You mean, compared to Dems calling this HCR?
Now THERE's some hypocrisy. Anything DK could do pales in comparison. But I see nothing of the sort from him. He hasn't changed his positions. He simply wouldn't cave and "go along to get along". That's hypocrisy now? Not by my Websters' it isn't.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 06:43 AM
Response to Reply #37
59. It is possible
just less probable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zomby Woof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
24. McDermott and Waxman voted yes too
They are authentic progressive Democrats with a proven track record. McDermott has been an advocate of single-payer for YEARS, but I suppose because he voted for the bill, he is a (let's see if I can get the jargon right) "corporatist DLC sell-out whore".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #24
39. You got it
So long as the words "corpratist" and DLC are in there. "Whore" is just gravy :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
25. In 2001, every liberal in the Senate voted for the PATRIOT Act.
Except for Feingold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zomby Woof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. This thread is about the House
A very different animal from the Senate.

Yes, the liberals in the Senate who voted for the Unpatriotic Act were wrong, but check the House voting record, and there were plenty more dissenters from the liberal ranks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #25
36. Well then I guess that tells us something significant
Edited on Sun Nov-08-09 03:17 PM by HughMoran
:crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
30. Too bad you have to point this out on DU.
But this place has become a festering pool of trollism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
34. It wasn't "every other liberal" it was EVERY liberal
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
35. AND AS LONG AS THEY ARE WILLING TO DO SO,
WE WILL NEVER SEE UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE IN THIS NATION!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
40. Kucinich also voted against the Patriot Act and the Iraq war --

quick, name another liberal who did that!

I trust Kucinich's judgement on this lousy health insurance bill, too. The idea that any health insurance bill is a good one is insane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BumRushDaShow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #40
55. Barbara Lee
Edited on Sun Nov-08-09 07:30 PM by BumRushDaShow
who not only did that but went as far back as to vote "no" for any use of force after 9/11 (including voting against the first authorization of use of force that became law on 9/18/01). She was the only member of Congress (from either side) to do so: http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2001/09/alone-hill

The vote in the Senate was 98 - 0 and in the House, it was 420 - 1 and Kucinich was not that one. She was. And she was harassed unmercifully for doing that.

Yet she voted for this bill.

I have been a strong Kucinich supporter and I agree with him being the conscience of the progressive movement. His exhortations are sorely needed in order to set the scale and remind people where the left should be considering how what was once "center", has been lurched to the far right. However sometimes you have to compromise to get a foot in the door and the Progressive caucus seems to have taken that route.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
45. kucinich worship knows no logic
it's like arguing with creationists.

he can do no wrong.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. Dennisites have a much better record on this board than the Barackolytes
Having a regular poster here since the summer of '01, it's TRUE: there are characteristics of the various camps that tend to hold true. Kucinich supporters have traditionally been rather mild, accepting, and honorable, if a bit on the sanctimonious side.

They have not tended to be as blisteringly dismissive and outright combative as Deanies in '03, as scorched-earth triumphal as Clark-barkers in '03 and early '04, nor as supremely dogmatic and cult-like as Obama supporters.

Kucinich is too far to the left for my taste, and some of his policies are completely impractical, but he's a man of principle. He has, on occasion, voted against abortion, and although I disagree with this stance (that he's evolved away from and explained) it is in keeping with his Catholicism and stance on life: he's against the death penalty and a vegetarian. There's a consistency and moral through-line here, and yet he doesn't strut and puff as one of the morally superior. (There is a bit of a whiff of this about him and his followers, but dammit, they ARE moral, and much of that sniveling is from those who realize they're on the short end of the ethical stick.)

He voted for some of the early moves on impeachment of Bill Clinton, too, and he did so out of a respect for the law, regardless of partisan affiliation.

As for his supporters, the consistency of their positions is at least founded on SOMETHING. Mr. Obama seems to be on some vague crusade of oneness that makes sure nobody is ever left not liking him, and the choke-hold of corporate power structures are a given for him, not just a necessary evil or unavoidable reality.

I fully understand his vote here, and we'll see how history sorts this out.

The acid test of all this is whether the poor, working poor and middle class get better care and are less at risk. We already KNOW that the insurance companies are going to do just fine; that's the skeleton upon which this bill was built.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #46
48. i agree with that 100%
Edited on Sun Nov-08-09 05:22 PM by paulsby
i'm not sayin' the barackolytes are any better. they ARE probably worse.

i respect kucinich, fwiw. but, like you, he's too far to my left for my taste, either.

is this HCR bill perfect?

hell no.

is it better than what we got now?

absolutely.

and i say that as somebody with a phenomenal cadillac plan

it won't help ME, but it will help society
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BzaDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #46
49. Republicans vote in principle too.
That doesn't mean they shouldn't all be thrown out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tonysam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #46
53. Dennis is a politician, pure and simple. He's no better than the rest of them.
The big problem with the Kucinich worshipers is just that--they are engaging in hero worship.

Politicians aren't heroes typically--and they sure as heck aren't gods.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
47. Almost every other liberal voted for the Iraq War Resolution.
Perhaps that's not the best measure of whether a vote is good or bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cherchez la Femme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
50. What matters the reason for a vote anymore?
Pure black & white: if the vote's No it's BAAAAAAD!

Sheeple in DU, who'da thunk?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tonysam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
51. But. But. But. They aren't "real" Democrats like Dennis
Edited on Sun Nov-08-09 06:16 PM by tonysam
They don't stand for principle.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
54. The utopians gave us Nixon
and they're going to give us fucking Huckabee or some other nightmare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
56. ahem, single-payer advocate Eric Massa voted no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 06:15 AM
Response to Original message
58. And all the republicans (save one newbie) voted against it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC