Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I was away most of yesterday...Why are people calling for Kucinich's head? n/t

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 11:22 AM
Original message
I was away most of yesterday...Why are people calling for Kucinich's head? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. He voted against the insurance mandate bill. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. So are we supposed to kick him out of the party now, or what? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #8
21. It's time for a primary challenge
Kucinich is an obstructionist of the progressive agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #8
22. Oh, no. I love DK. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProleNoMore Donating Member (316 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #1
11. Roger - He Voted Against A Wall Street Style Bailout Of the Insurance Industry
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. Which also happened to be the most serious attempt at reform we've seen since '94.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProleNoMore Donating Member (316 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. So - A Bad Bill Is Still A Bad Bill
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #20
28. "So" will not save the 45,000 Americans who will die due to lack of coverage this year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProleNoMore Donating Member (316 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #28
32. Hmm - And How Will Those 45,000 Pay For The Mandate Health Care
That is really designed to make the insurance companies wealthier by increasing teh number of people in their for-profit pool?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #32
36. Are you suggesting it is better to be dead than be fined?
And can you explain to me why, if this is such a windfall for insurance companies, they fought it tooth and nail?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abelenkpe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #32
38. Good question
As it stands now when one is unemployed they can choose to extend their old benefits at an outrageous cost no one can afford for long before rendering them destitute. With rising unemployment this trend will continue increasing the number of people without health insurance. I personally know friends who work full time, get no insurance through work and cannot afford health care. If the public option (starting later) does not cost significantly less how does this help those who already can't afford health care afford health care? What's to stop those 45,000 people from dying before we begin this plan? Why are we punishing those that clearly cannot afford care with penalties for not buying insurance out of pocket?

Health care should not be for profit.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. He voted with the Blue Dogs and GOP on HCR. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProleNoMore Donating Member (316 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. No - He Voted Against A Bad Bill - Be Honest
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #4
13. He recorded the same vote as the GOP and Blue Dogs.
The House does not record "No, but" votes, it records "yes" or "no".

Kucinich, the Blue Dogs and the GOP all voted "No" to HCR.

There is nothing dishonest about that statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProleNoMore Donating Member (316 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. So - No For Dennis Equals A No For A Bad Bill - The Distinction Raised is Meaningless
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #4
23. You are both wrong. He voted for an ideal that could not be achieved today
Others believe you need to start somewhere and build on it

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProleNoMore Donating Member (316 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. Wishful Thinking At Best
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #25
31. and so is thinking that Congress would vote for single payer today. At least this bill
Edited on Sun Nov-08-09 11:34 AM by still_one
if it becomes law, can be changed. No bill, means nothing, you have to start from square zero, and there is no guarantee that they will have the votes to accomplish that in the near future




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProleNoMore Donating Member (316 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #31
33. One Is Delighted That One Is Happy - This One Is Not Happy And Will Not Be Brow Beaten On This Topic
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #33
37. excellent /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abelenkpe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #31
41. Congress no
But if you put that vote to the people yes it would.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProleNoMore Donating Member (316 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
3. Because Some Don't Like The Fact That He Is A Man Of Principle And Character
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. And others can't afford his "principle and character". nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProleNoMore Donating Member (316 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. Without Character, We Get Bills Like The One Passed Last Night
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Without access to health care we die. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProleNoMore Donating Member (316 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. Without Affordable Access For All The Risk Is Not Spread And The Cost Stays The Same
People Still Die.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laf.La.Dem. Donating Member (924 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #3
24. Man of Principle and Character??
Mr. Joseph Cao R-La. voted his principle and character - he could have easily voted the right wing - oops - GOP side - he voted AFTER the 218 votes to pass the bill.

Thank you Mr. Cao a man with principle and character:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #3
27. He is the lefty equivalent of Joe Lieberman.
Oh wait, that's an insult to Lieberman - he's actually passed a few bills. Kucinich is a grandstanding asshole that stands for nothing except advancing his own brand. Nothing - absolutely nothing more.

If you want to support a lefty that actually does something, support Bernie Sanders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cirque du So-What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #3
29. What medical conditions do DK's principle & character pay for?
This is cold comfort to anyone who can't obtain health insurance due to a preexisting condition (come hell or high water), who has run out their lifetime limit on coverage, or work for employers who don't offer anything resembling 'affordable' insurance to their workers. Lofty ideals don't make a very satisfying meal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
5. Because the little brat bolted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
7. He dared to have a spine AND be called a Democrat
at the same time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MuseRider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #7
39. :)
That does take guts!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
9. He voted against the Insurance Corporation Bailout Act. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #9
16. Correct answer.
The DLCers know that the bill was authored by the insurance companies, and that's why they're attempting to smear Dennis for opposing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
10. Kucinich voted against the health care bill
along with a few other progressives. They're calling him out as too ideologically pure to be retained.

Personally, I'm glad a few progressives voted against this one. The Stupak amendment is completely unacceptable.

Had the vote been closer, my opinion would be different. However, there were enough favorable votes for progressives to make their stand known.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
19. Because he dared to utter to the truth, that the emperor has no clothes,
That this is a horrible bill that strengthens the corporate hold on this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
26. The bill that should have been passed was to make all health insurance companies non-profit again,
Edited on Sun Nov-08-09 11:32 AM by valerief
like they were before the HMO explosion in the 80s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
30. He doesn't look so good on paper.
Years from now, when people look at his votes, they won't have a clue he was one of our finest liberals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
34. Because he didn't play ball with the sellouts and the "pie in the sky" DLC'rs are upset.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
35. Assholes are being shamed by his stand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
40. Because our party still isn't Republikun enough for some.
It seems principles and human rights are just too expensive to ask our masters to bear.

This bill helps just as many people as bankruptcy "reform", welfare "reform", and TARP has, but we were all supposed to just take our beating, lick the boot, and crawl back to our hovel until we're called again.

But as our majority shrinks away and the Republiks regain the power to finish the job once and for all, it will be somebody else's fault.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bumblebee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. I have a suggestion. Why doesn't Kucinich form his own party and
his supporters can then vote for him ALL the time. Or he and Nader can share the same party, which, on the other hand, is probably not a good arrangement given the egos involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. Even better, why don't you go and take your own party back? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flaneur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. Be careful what you wish for. Y'all are still whining about Nader costing you the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
44. you miss the posts annointing him god evidently
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
46. the nitwit voted against the damn bill!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC