Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What is Obama going to tell the 10+% unemployed population now that they owe insurance co's $1000's?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 09:27 AM
Original message
What is Obama going to tell the 10+% unemployed population now that they owe insurance co's $1000's?
Edited on Sun Nov-08-09 09:28 AM by brentspeak
Just look how stupid and sick this bill is:

1) In the same week that the unemployment rate officially hit double-digits, Obama and the Dem leadership have now made it mandatory for those same unemployed people to somehow cough up several thousands of dollars to pay insurance companies who are already getting at least $1 trillion of tax dollars.

2) If you are broke and in debt because Blue Cross/Horizon/Wellpoint/etc. denied your medical claim, guess what? The new bill forces you to still do business with the same vultures who put you where you are.

Maybe the idiots out there doing a victory lap over this NON-public-option atrocity will tell us where all these desperate and broke people are going to magically come up with all this money to pay off the insurance cartel and keep the government off their backs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. Medicaid
It is now easier to qualify.

Read the bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Medicaid is largely the responsibility of the states, though
and poorer states will be hard-pressed to cope. Of course the fed share will be beefed up, and at some point there will be a tipping point where the whole mess will be morphed into medicare for all.. but probably not until most of us Boomers are dead and gone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. So at least 40 million people have to cross their fingers and hope
and pray that they'll now qualify for Medicaid.

And if they're denied? Which creek will they be up in?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #4
15. Actually they need to read the bill to see if they qualify
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tonysam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #15
21. I seriously doubt people collecting UI qualify for Medicaid
You have to have virtually NO assets and no money at all to qualify. It's the same as qualifying for food stamps. Although I draw UI, my income through UI is twice as much as what would make me qualify for food stamps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. Do you have a copy of this provision?
I have Googled it, but only right wing shit comes up. Please copy and paste it here if you have it handy. Or don't. I'm just asking for someone to throw me a line. For some reason, I have been unable to find it. Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
5. When they gave up "single-payer"
They gave up the populist, truly Democratic proposal to help the average American. Since then, all they have been discussing is the form of the subsidy the corporations would be getting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. single payer was NEVER on the table. It's a complete fiction to pretend it was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. The possiblilty of one was in the form of the Kucinich amendment.
But in the fight for the lobbyists dollars between the two parties, it was removed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #14
20. sorry, but that is hardly on the table. Nor were Sanders efforts.
Unless it's proposed and backed by the leadership and the President, it's not on the table.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
6. "Provides federal financial help for lower and middle income consumers so they can obtain coverage."
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/politics/story/78519.html

10 ways the House bill would change health care

By David Lightman | McClatchy Newspapers


WASHINGTON — These are some of the changes in the way health insurance would work in the United States if the House bill were to become law:

1. Creates a government-run plan, or "public option," to offer insurance coverage to compete with private sector insurance companies.

2. Sets up health insurance "exchanges," or marketplaces, where consumers can easily compare coverage and rates.

3. Requires nearly everyone to obtain health insurance coverage starting in 2013.

4. Requires health plans to allow young adults to remain on their parents' policies till their 27th birthday

5. Provides federal financial help for lower and middle income consumers so they can obtain coverage.

6. Bars insurers from denying or limiting coverage because of pre-existing conditions.

7. Bars insurers from imposing lifetime limits on coverage.

8. Expands Medicaid coverage to more people.

9. Imposes a 5.4 percent surcharge on adjusted gross incomes of more than $500,000 for individuals and $1 million for joint filers.

10. Imposes penalties on people and businesses who fail to comply with the new law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeatleBoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #6
18. Ahhh!
Thank you for this post babylonsister.

Makes sense to me.

:thumbsup:




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poiuyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #6
22. I wonder what " federal financial help" means?
I hope it's not just a tax credit. People with low incomes don't have tax problems, they have cash flow problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BzaDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #22
28. It is a subsidy that is advanced as soon as it is needed. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
7. Is it your misguided opinion that "public option" means "free health insurance"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #7
17. To answer your question: No.
Why do you ask? I never made that claim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #17
27. Because of this comment of yours in the OP:
"Maybe the idiots out there doing a victory lap over this NON-public-option atrocity will tell us where all these desperate and broke people are going to magically come up with all this money to pay off the insurance cartel and keep the government off their backs?"

Your all caps for NON-public-option was the big clue. Maybe you can explain your comment.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
8. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Yeah. We need a Mendacious Douchebag forum here
to put threads such as this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
10. They'll pay the 2.5% tax on their income.
Which will be $0 because they are fucking unemployed and don't have any fucking income. But thanks for asking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #10
16. So, if someone is self-employed, but earns just a middling amount
Edited on Sun Nov-08-09 10:17 AM by brentspeak
just enough to pay the rent/mortgage/put food on the table, "all" they have to do is simply fork over 2.5% of their already meager earnings. They may default on a crucial bill payment in order to pay that 2.5%, but that's ok with you. Oh, and while that portion of the bill goes into effect immediately, the portion which says that they "may" receives subsidies to help pay insurance premiums doesn't go into effect until... 2013.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BzaDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #16
29. Thats actually complete BS.
The mandate does not go into effect until 2013 at the same time the subsidies go into affect. Read the bill and educate yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
12. To pay the 2.5% income tax, which will be $0 for the unemployed.
Good try, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eilen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #12
25. Actually 2.5% of their unemployment check
In NYS our unemployment is maybe $425 before federal taxes are withheld, of course you can opt to have your state taxes withheld as well so it ends up being $3xx.00. So, will the government want 2.5% of the unemployment check or the net? Unemployment insurance is considered taxable income as is Social Security which one can collect before the age of 65 and are thus ineligible for Medicare.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
13. This bill is a train wreck from a public relations point of view.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #13
19. Agreed. All the people who haven't been paying attention have to hear is
they'll be penalized for not buying insurance they may not be able to afford. There will be plenty of pissed off people lining up at the polls next November. Who's to say what's affordable in the first place. Everyone's circumstances are different.

If the final bill doesn't lose the mandates and, on another note, if unemployment doesn't start to turn around, the Dems will be in deep shit in 2010.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
23. So what are they doing now that gives them good inexpensive health care?
Edited on Sun Nov-08-09 10:44 AM by stray cat
maybe you can donate to your neighbors to pay for their health care if they don't want to pay for insurance?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
24. They can pay the penalty because the UE have lots of moeny lying around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
26. God, the misinformation is flying fast and loose around here today.
Edited on Sun Nov-08-09 04:40 PM by quiet.american
If you are on unemployment, chances are your income is at, below or just above 150% of poverty level. You would qualify either for a 97% credit towards a premium, or for Medicaid or for the high-risk pool. You will not be challenged to "cough up several thousands of dollars to pay insurance companies." Add to that, your COBRA coverage, currently subsidized by the stimulus program, is extended to 2013.

If you are broke and in debt, same thing. You would be able to qualify for one of the above, plus when you're back on your feet, have an expanded option to shop for insurance at reduced, subsidized costs with the added protection that an insurance company can never again cause you to be broke and in debt.

And if you want a link, Google the bill and summaries and actually read them for yourself.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #26
30. Don't confuse the numbnutz Purists with facts. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #26
32. Thank you.
I'm afraid that if I google search some of the shit I'm seeing about the House bill on DU, it would originate at FR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leeroysphitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
31. Mandates are garbage this bill is garbage those who wrote it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC