Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Was there a memo that getting perfect health reform was going to be easy?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:13 AM
Original message
Was there a memo that getting perfect health reform was going to be easy?
I didn't see it.

For years, I watched what happens to good people without insurance and how it tore up their lives. I saw a man lose his house because had a heart attack. He went to a homeless shelter. I've seen patients die from waiting too long to go to the doctor because they didn't have insurance.

There is nothing more horrible than hearing a mother ask how she was going to pay for antibiotics for her sick child.

You can bitch all you want about how this bill isn't what you hope, but the American people won because the road to reform got a little bit shorter tonight.

Rather than lament at how horrible this is for America and how Dems aren't really Dems, or that Dems are really Repukes, or that Dennis Kucinich is the biggest sellout since Metallica went Guitar Hero, why not just work on your reps and write letters to make this bill better?

A lot of folks seem to be more interested in eating their young and having a pitty party about how the Dems aren't doing exactly what they wanted.

Geez, folks...we beat the repukes...AGAIN! :woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. "work on your reps and write letters to make this bill better" GOOD ADVICE
Edited on Sun Nov-08-09 03:15 AM by emulatorloo
Recommending (but it got canceled out)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:15 AM
Response to Original message
2. And what the passage of this bill does is advances the chance of
Edited on Sun Nov-08-09 03:16 AM by FrenchieCat
38 Million Americans, many of them minority, to now be able to go see a doctor....
this will help prevent unwanted pregnancies, improve prenatal health,
and reduce infant mortality.

Many of my brothers and sisters will be
able to get tested for HIV and then get some treatment; same for high blood pressure,
diabetes, and the other fatal ailments that hurt my community more than many others....

This bill, when passed will make a difference,
and anyone who says otherwise really doesn't care about the downtrotten,
they just like to pretend that they do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:17 AM
Response to Original message
3. I canceled out someone's Unrec. Yeesh. Good points, cynatnite. Good luck getting through...
Edited on Sun Nov-08-09 03:18 AM by Hekate
... to the "Woe is me, I'm going to eat thistles" Eeyores.

Hekate

@#%^# typo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Go2Peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
28. You misunderstand most of the people who are dissapointed
Like me they support what we have, but we just aren't going to "celebrate" and try to put "lipstick" on this pig. What is so hard to understand about that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:18 AM
Response to Original message
4. It Is Very Good That This Bill Passed Tonight, Ma'am
It is a very flawed Bill, but it is an important, indeed an essential first step. You are quite right that we should keep focus on the good that has been done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:18 AM
Response to Original message
5. It's already too late to make this year's bill better
Bills are only watered down in the Senate and in conference committee. Bills never get stronger later in the process.

I'm glad something passed. I'm not sure whether it's enough to matter on any but the symbolic level, though.

We COULD have got a real bill through.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:19 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Medicare and medicaid are always getting tweaked and made better...
That's after they were signed, too. This will be no different, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:24 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Social Security as well. When signed it was quite restrictive, it was opened up over the years nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:32 AM
Response to Reply #7
16. When did they even START tweaking those? Fifteen years after they passed?
Were any meaningful gains made in Social Security in the Thirties, when it mattered?

Can the sick wait for increments? We can assume none will come while THIS Congress still sits. They'll all say "we passed the bill, the story's over, get out of my face".

Nobody that insisted on a weak bill in the first place is going to go along with making the bill better later. People's minds don't work like that.

Incrementalism was only possible in the past. It doesn't happen anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:39 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. A brief history of medicare...


1945 Harry Truman sends a message to Congress asking for
legislation establishing a national health insurance plan.

Two decades of debate ensue, with opponents warning of the
dangers of "socialized medicine."

By the end of Truman's administration, he had backed off
from a plan for universal coverage, but administrators in
the Social Security system and others had begun to focus
on the idea of a program aimed at insuring Social Security
beneficiaries.

July 30, 1965 Medicare and its companion program Medicaid, (which
insures indigent recipients), are signed into law by
President Lyndon Johnson as part of his "Great Society."

Ex-president Truman is the first to enroll in Medicare.

Medicare Part B premium is $3 per month.

1972 Disabled persons under age 65 and those with end-stage
renal disease become eligible for coverage.

Services expand to include some chiropractic services,
speech therapy and physical therapy.

Payments to HMOs are authorized.

Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program is established
for the elderly and disabled poor. SSI recipients are
automatically eligible for Medicaid.

1982 Hospice benefits are added on a temporary basis.

1983 Change from "reasonable cost" to prospective payment
system based on diagnosis-related groups for hospital
inpatient services begins.

Most federal civilian employees become covered.

1984 Remaining federal employees, including President, members
of Congress and federal judiciary become covered.

1986 Hospice benefits become permanent.

1988 Major overhaul of Medicare benefits is enacted aimed at
providing coverage for catastrophic illness and
prescription drugs.

Coverage is added for routine mammography.

1989 Catastrophic coverage and prescription drug coverage are
repealed.

Coverage is added for pap smears.

1992 Physician services payments are based on fee schedule.

1997 Medicare+Choice is enacted under the Balanced Budget Act.
Some provisions prove to be so financially restrictive
when regulations are unveiled that Congress is forced to
revisit the issue in 1999.

1999 Congress "refines" Medicare+Choice and relaxes some
Medicare funding restrictions under the Balanced Budget
Refinement Act of 1999.

2000 Medicare+Choice Final Rule takes effect.

Prospective payment systems for outpatient services and
home health agencies take effect.

Medicare Part B premium is $45.40 per month.

http://seniorjournal.com/NEWS/2000%20Files/Aug%2000/FTR-08-04-00MedCarHistry.htm

Now, I know you want your idea of perfect health care reform to happen right now, but it won't. Even after it happens, and it will happen, improving on it will come along in increments. That is reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corpseratemedia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 06:40 AM
Response to Reply #18
23. +1
yeah I wanted single-payer, but the hate-anything-that-works-in-Europe crowd had destroyed any chance in 93-94. This is how things work here, because of hysterical anti-government (formerly anti-communism ...now that communism=government rofl) sentiment.



I don't see the teabaggers giving up their "socialist" medicare. Neither will they be complaining about the closing of the donut hole with this dem bill!

We just have to make sure that this does not start out as corrupt as Medicare part D did. I think we have at least a better chance of stopping that and changing things with a democratic majority. Even with pathetic republican blue dogs dinos standing in the way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:21 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. It passed by the slimmest of margins as it is. We could not have gotten "a real bill through"...
... at all.

Keep on your Senators. Keep working. Social Security and Medicare have both changed since 1933 and 1965, haven't they?

Hekate

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:29 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. Most of those who need help will have died before any changes are made
Only the healthy can settle for incrementalism. Slight changes can't help those who are sick now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:33 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. how about those who get sick in the future?
A lot of people will die while this thing is being done. That's a given. My biggest complaint is that much of this won't go into effect until 2013 and I'll be writing letters in hope of making some kind of difference.

I'm not willing to throw the baby out with the bathwater on this thing. We take what we can and work on making it better as we go. That's what they've done with medicare and medicaid. They've done that with the VA, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:50 AM
Response to Reply #15
21. Slight changes help them a damn bit more than NO changes...

If you need $10,000... are you going to turn down $1,000 because it doesn't meet your needs?


Or are you going to take it, and then work to get the other $9,000?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Go2Peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #9
29. I disagree with this analysis. We could have done better. At the very least they had cover for a
stronger "public option".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:18 AM
Response to Original message
6. At the peak of Democratic power in the past 50 years
The only thing they can manage is a bill that is shitty on cost containment, mandates insurance to the citizens with the threat of prison or fines, and a public option that is weaker than a wine cooler.

Forgive me when I'm skeptical that this is our foot in the door moment.

:rant:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andym Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:55 AM
Response to Reply #6
22. It's the peak of Democratic power since the 95th Congress (1977-9)= 30 years
Edited on Sun Nov-08-09 03:57 AM by andym
So it's only the last 30 years. 95th Congress was more Democratic--> Senate 61(D) vs 39 (R). House 292 (D) vs 143 (R)
Btw, that Congress passed the Clean Water Act among others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LatteLibertine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:20 AM
Response to Original message
8. I'd essentially agree
Edited on Sun Nov-08-09 03:22 AM by LatteLibertine
Things will be achieved slowly and in increments. Getting some form of HCR done opens the door to future reform making it all the easier. This a very long term project and a game of chess not checkers.

On another note, defeating HCR would take serious momentum and force away from President Obama. It would lend that force to Republicans and would make it much more difficult for President Obama to accomplish anything meaningful for the rest of his term. This is precisely why Republicans are so vehement in their opposition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BREMPRO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:26 AM
Response to Original message
11. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:27 AM
Response to Original message
12. Tonight we are hearing from the crybaby/whiner faction of the Democratic Party
These are the folks who gave us McGovern, Mondale and Dukakis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:29 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Really the only primary vote I ever cast was for Barack Obama
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:39 AM
Response to Reply #12
19. There was nobody better available in 1972
Scoop Jackson wouldn't have won(and since he was still prowar he'd have governed like Nixon on everything else). Humphrey was permanently discredited and permanently unpopular after 1968. And the smear of Muskie was Nixon's fault. McGovern's loss was solely the responsibility of the party regulars, who deserted him when he'd done nothing to them that justified the desertion. History proved McGovern was right about everything and the Humphrey/Jackson sellouts were wrong about everything.

And it was the ones who did the deserting who imposed Mondale in '84. Besides, there weren't even any Dems to his right who had any real support that year.

And Dukakis was the candidate of the regulars, the ones who never wanted the party to back universal healthcare. He was not imposed on the party by "liberals" against the better judgment of the pros.

So you're whole analysis of party history is bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:46 AM
Response to Reply #12
20. Ah yes, Dukakis
I remember ideological firebrands leaping over Simon and Jackson for seemingly bloodless techo-wonk Dukakis. The stealth Maoist who signalled his true intentions with secret pinky waves for the initiated. We paid for such uncompromising far-left purity, we did indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:29 AM
Response to Original message
13. Tell you what...
You pay for my forced/mandated insurance and I'll STFU.

That sounds fair enough to me.

If those of us who are uninsured could afford to be insured, we would ALREADY be insured. Forcing us to buy insurance with money we don't have isn't solving anything. They didn't need over a thousand pages to write this bill. They only needed one sentence: "All uninsured citizens of the US will now be forced by law to buy insurance."

This is not going to work.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 06:45 AM
Response to Reply #13
24. Highly Likely To Be Wrong
As the pool increases the price goes down, since the mutual risk is shared across a higher population. Cost of health care won't go up much since many, many uninsured are already getting health care in ER's and just can't cover the payments. So, the colletive pool of risk requires a lower premium per insured.

Hence, your problem is ameliorated somewhat since being insured will be more affordable.

Secondly, adding a public option creates a non-profit competitor with no greater overhead costs. This should lower the overall cost of premiums in quite a short time.

So, for many unisured people, this is GOING to work.
GAC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
25. Rec'd. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 07:31 AM
Response to Original message
26. Won the "right" to be fined and/or jailed if we don't pony up $$ to the private insurers
What a victory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WVRICK13 Donating Member (930 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
27. At Least It Is A Beginning
Once people adjust to the changes initiated by this bill they may be open to other changes in the right direction in the future. Remember our government moves slowly when it comes to doing the right thing. It only moves fast if it involves RW legislation to shaft the middle and lower income citizens in our society.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC