Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If this bill had been more "progressive", it would have never had a chance

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Ardent15 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 12:49 AM
Original message
If this bill had been more "progressive", it would have never had a chance
This bill is progress. Is it perfect? No. Is it what we really wanted? Of course not. You rarely get what you want in politics.

Right now, the Democrats who voted against the bill-even the progressive ones like Kucinich-are looking like Republicans to the average voter. Not saying that that is accurate, but that's how they are perceived.

It seems that some people would rather let the other side win then achieve anything less than what's in their dreams.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. this bill is worse than the status quo.
At least before tonight, I didn't face jail time for refusing to buy private insurance; now I can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. The bill has not been finalized.....
and when it is, there will be no provision for you going to jail
for not purchasing health insurance.

Hyperbole is not nice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MajorChode Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. Hyperbole is all they have
Sometimes you just have to run with the ball.

I didn't get exactly what I wanted so fuck everyone else and the horse they rode in on. So much more open mindedness on the left, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Go2Peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 01:53 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. So this is the "best" with a Democratic Majority? I'll accept the bill, but it is not representation
This bill has components that may be needed, but hell, it is not a good bill and it was watered down by people that should have been listening to us and not a corrupt industry of death. We have a majority. So regardless how this is spun this is not something we should be happy with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raineyb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 01:55 AM
Response to Reply #2
17. It's not hyperbole if it's actually in the bill.
I wouldn't count it as removed until it's actually removed. IF it's removed and frankly, I don't have a hell of a lot of faith in the party to remove it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 01:58 AM
Original message
That is a provision in the bill that was voted on tonight
What you think the Senate is going to be more merciful to working Americans? They have such a history of passing the more progressive bill of the two houses of congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mullard12ax7 Donating Member (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 12:52 AM
Response to Original message
3. Women don't deserve rights huh? Why stand up for them?
Sell the beyotches out so at some later date some undefined health care option will include them huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
4. I don't think those were the only two options.
I think a stronger bill COULD have passed, with the right pressure, deal-making, political carrots and sticks, etc.

This bill is not only BS as a healthcare bill (and a big gift to the insurance industry), it sets women's reproductive rights way back.

Much ado, on both sides, about little when it comes to "socialized" anything or great big help on anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 12:55 AM
Response to Original message
5. Single payer was not possible. This will work.
No hospital can refuse to treat people because they don't have health care. It is time that they paid something for that privilege.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Hospitals refuse to treat people every minute of every day.
WTF are you talking about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
6. Even though what you say is 100% accurate
...and the bill is actually quite good and well thought out, don't expect a lot of people here to agree with you. Perfect is the only answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rwheeler31 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
7. This is true,politics is compromise not war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Go2Peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 01:56 AM
Response to Reply #7
18. I am fine with "compromise". But this was not compromise, it was a sellout to special interests
I can't believe the contingent here that think this is representative democracy.

We sound like abuse victims. Like this is all we deserve and should expect. My God, we have a majority. We should be mad as HELL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
8. Why not?
Seriously, why would it have not had a chance?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ardent15 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Because of these people
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. Exactly. It's not Dennis nor his kind.
It's the spineless paid-for "dems" to blame.

Didn't we win the WH and both the Senate and House?

Sucks when even the trifecta comes up short.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Libertas1776 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Of course it wouldn't have a chance.
Anything that isn't even offered to begin with will never pass...because, ya know...IT DOESN'T EXIST! But the political prognosticators on this thread are oh so certain what the outcome of a proposition that never saw the light of day would have been...had it been given a chance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stuball111 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
13. 37 "Democrats" voted against it?
They should have Red from "That 70's Show" sink his foot in their collective asses!:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Birthmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
14. Why is that?
Is it because the constituents didn't want as much change, or is it because it would upset the insurance lobbyists who donate so much to Congress?

If it's the former, I'm fine with that.

If it's the latter...ehhh, not so much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 01:58 AM
Response to Original message
19. I don't recall FDR trying to establish the WPA, the TVA, Social Security,
and his other reforms in one bill either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greennina Donating Member (295 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
20. Instead we're stuck with new Obama debtor prisons...
instead of real heal care. I'm sorry you're so stupid you think the Party can't do better than that. We could have had real reform. Instead we're stuck with being forced at gun point to give money to insurance companies and with up to five years in prison for not giving them money, even if we can't afford it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC