|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
mullard12ax7 (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 12:44 AM Original message |
It's OK to throw women's rights out now, we need widdle teeny steps to start |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 12:46 AM Response to Original message |
1. The Hyde Amendment is still the law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sparkly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 12:49 AM Original message |
This reaches into private health insurance. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emulatorloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 12:50 AM Response to Original message |
13. Sounds like it is ripe for being thrown out in conference then, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 12:55 AM Response to Original message |
16. It prevents abortion from being included in the exchange plans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sparkly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 12:57 AM Response to Reply #16 |
18. It prevents subsidies to private companies that provide abortions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 01:03 AM Response to Reply #18 |
22. Which could be fixed with a ryder |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sparkly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 01:05 AM Response to Reply #22 |
23. "No big deal?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 01:12 AM Response to Reply #23 |
30. Thus the word "fixed" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sparkly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 01:35 AM Response to Reply #30 |
40. Did you read what I posted? It doesn't matter. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 02:17 AM Response to Reply #40 |
46. If they're required to offer the riders |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Atticus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 01:06 AM Response to Reply #1 |
25. Again I ask: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 01:18 AM Response to Reply #25 |
35. All abortion would have been covered |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 12:46 AM Response to Original message |
2. Once wasn't enough? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
valerief (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 12:46 AM Response to Original message |
3. Maybe when they rewrite the Bible, abortion will become sacred and get a Jeebus Seal of Approval. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
debbierlus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 12:46 AM Response to Original message |
4. If they were talking about any other medical procedure, there would be outrage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mullard12ax7 (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 12:56 AM Response to Reply #4 |
17. It is as if it's 1860 and it's outrageous to even discuss equal rights |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 01:11 AM Response to Reply #17 |
28. it is as if it is 1860 here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 12:47 AM Response to Original message |
5. What about a movie where they have like, you know, women who are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emulatorloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 12:47 AM Response to Original message |
6. How many of these hyperbolic threads do you have going? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
countingbluecars (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 12:48 AM Response to Reply #6 |
9. This is #6 at least. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emulatorloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 12:51 AM Response to Reply #9 |
14. I think this one may be the least overheated n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chimpymustgo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 12:55 PM Response to Reply #9 |
48. There cannot be ENOUGH theads about this outrage. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 12:48 AM Response to Original message |
7. exactly. all or fucking nothing... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sparkly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 12:48 AM Response to Original message |
8. Yup. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC_SKP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 12:49 AM Response to Original message |
10. Leading up to a GBCW thread? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 12:49 AM Response to Original message |
11. Did you know you can reply and add more to your own threads? Don't HAVE to keep starting new ones? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 12:58 AM Response to Reply #11 |
19. Deleted message |
uppityperson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 01:07 AM Response to Reply #19 |
26. I think you do not understand what those words mean. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Unvanguard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 12:49 AM Response to Original message |
12. It's okay to compromise when necessary for a bill to make things better |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dflprincess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 01:03 AM Response to Reply #12 |
21. Let's compromise by throwing men's health care out of the bill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Unvanguard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 01:05 AM Response to Reply #21 |
24. If allowing a vote on that were necessary to get passage, it would be fine with me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dflprincess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 01:09 AM Response to Reply #24 |
27. Easy to say when you know it won't happen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Unvanguard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 01:14 AM Response to Reply #27 |
31. Preferring nothing to something harms women too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 01:16 AM Response to Reply #21 |
34. so women's health care = abortion? really? is that all you see a doctor for? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dflprincess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 01:26 AM Response to Reply #34 |
36. Reproductive rights are a very important part of women's health care |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 01:37 AM Response to Reply #36 |
42. no one is "throwing someone else's rights out the window." this bill does not effect your rights... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dflprincess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 01:53 AM Response to Reply #42 |
43. Why should a woman have to pay for a medical procedure out of pocket |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 02:01 AM Response to Reply #43 |
44. what "rights" did you lose here? none. you lost no rights. stop saying that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dflprincess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 02:03 AM Response to Reply #44 |
45. If I'm paying for health care, I expect all my medical needs to be covered |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 02:23 AM Response to Reply #45 |
47. you lost no rights. no one is throwing your rights out the window... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 01:27 AM Response to Reply #34 |
37. I won't ever need one but that isn't the point. Which medical procedures of males or children are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 12:53 AM Response to Original message |
15. I bet you remember Xena. Was that her name? How about if they put |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 12:59 AM Response to Original message |
20. I'm as pissed of about the Stupak POS Amendment, but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 01:12 AM Response to Original message |
29. I'll bet if it were necessary to repeal women's right to vote to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CaliforniaPeggy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 01:15 AM Response to Reply #29 |
32. That would be no...nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jamastiene (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 01:34 AM Response to Reply #29 |
39. They probably would. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sparkly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 01:37 AM Response to Reply #29 |
41. Good point. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 01:16 AM Response to Original message |
33. That durn amendment would never have happened if there were any |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 01:29 AM Response to Original message |
38. If my 7th grade algebra teacher were still alive by god I'd sure like to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:52 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC