Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Future Felons of America, Make Your Reservations Now!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
MSchreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 11:44 PM
Original message
Future Felons of America, Make Your Reservations Now!
Edited on Sun Nov-08-09 12:06 AM by MSchreader
If you're one of the millions of poor and working people who won't be able to afford their mandatory health care, even with the paltry "subsidy", check in now for your pre-assigned prisoner numbers and make a reservation at one of the fine federal penitentiaries where you will be living for the next one to five years.

Those who can afford their health insurance need not apply.

ON EDIT: Let me just say that while the bill has some really good points, this one makes me a target. I can't afford any insurance, given my income, and I've been getting jerked around on getting Medicaid in this state for over a year. I guess I'll have to wait until July 2011 until I'm eligible for Medicare before I can get coverage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Th1onein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. I've been reading about this, and I think you are incorrect in your assumptions.
Edited on Sat Nov-07-09 11:50 PM by Th1onein
I'm not going to do the work for you, but information on this is all over DU.

I am one who will NOT be forced to buy from the insurance companies, and I am willing to kill any mother fucker who tries to force me to pay a fine, or be jailed for my refusal. And, even I can now see that the fine or prison shit is bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MSchreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I guess my attitude is that if even one person goes to jail for this
It's one too many.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. 2.5% tax surcharge + failure to pay = jail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. are you sure they won't just garnish your wages? Where do you see jail time anywhere?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MSchreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. From the bill...
• Section 7203 – misdemeanor willful failure to pay is punishable by a fine of up to $25,000 and/or imprisonment of up to one year.

• Section 7201 – felony willful evasion is punishable by a fine of up to $250,000 and/or imprisonment of up to five years.”


This is failure to pay or evasion of the excise tax that is to be charged on the health care plan you will have to purchase.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Th1onein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. BZZZT! WRONG!
No such sections in the bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MSchreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. You're right
My mistake. Those provisions are from the tax code.

Nonetheless, this bill has a 2.5 percent excise tax as part of the mandate. No payment of the tax = tax evasion = jail.

Another poster clarified this point well enough that I'm OK with just linking to his comment.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=6955395&mesg_id=6956564
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. your bullshit detector needs servicing n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. 40,000 bucks a year to hold one person in custody
This is also a sop to the prison industrial complex, apparently.

Taxpayers oughta revolt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
7. This is a rightwing chain email post.
Lots of idiots out tonight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
951-Riverside Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Spare me the rhetoric and post some facts that disproves what the OP just said n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MSchreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. The rightwing chain
Is the line of fools who think that everything with a "D" after it is unalloyed gold. Whatever one thinks of the other provisions of the bill, this one is messed up. Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Th1onein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. It's also NON-EXISTENT!
Chill out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MSchreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Here's the clarification
From another post on this issue. He says it as well as I could ever, so I'll let him talk for me.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=6955395&mesg_id=6956564
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Th1onein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. As I said before, YOU ARE INCORRECT.
PoliticalHeretic is posting something that DOES NOT EXIST in the bill. He got this info from a freeper email, apparently. Don't look to him for "clarification." Geez.

There are no such sections to the bill. Period. They do not exist. The highest section number is 3500 or something in that range.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MSchreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #16
20. Those two points are part of the Tax Code
They are relevant to the bill because of the 2.5 percent excise tax that comes as part of the mandates. Don't pay the excise tax = go to jail.

Maybe they didn't think too far ahead about it, or maybe they didn't care. One way or the other, sending poor people to jail because they can't afford health insurance is a problem. And, yes, putting an excise tax on mandated insurance is in the bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
15. About as logical as the death panel rumors
:eyes: Yeah... you're going to jail :eyes: :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MSchreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. I love folks like you
One bad word about something done by Dems and instantly everyone is a Republican/Freeper/Troll. It gives me that warm-and-fuzzy feeling to know that "either you're with us or you're with the enemy" is a bipartisan sentiment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. Your "concerns" are about as logical as the concerns about death panels
Maybe you should re-read your own OP? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWebHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 12:21 AM
Response to Original message
18. sections 7201 and 7203 are tax code references
you wouldn't insert tax code into the healthcare bill. There's certainly plenty of "Internal Revenue" references in the bill.. and it's logical they'd be in charge of collecting penalties for those failing to comply and jailing those who refuse to pay the fines. Tax credits for purchasing insurance on a graduated scale based on how much you pay vs. an employer (if applicable) is the better route.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC