|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 08:13 PM Original message |
Stupak amendment looks like it may get voted down. Funny how they keep quiet about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aSpeckofDust (292 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 08:14 PM Response to Original message |
1. Score! looks like the no's have it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 08:16 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. You have to give it to the Women's coalition in Congress. They also clarified what that amendment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 08:16 PM Response to Original message |
3. I like how 'Stupak' backwards is 'kaputs.' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pirate Smile (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 08:16 PM Response to Original message |
4. The vote has been postponed until later tonight. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 08:19 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Does this mean the Pro-life Dems may vote against the bill..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frazzled (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 08:22 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Set to go, I think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 08:25 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Guess they have to make time for Boehner's alternative Abortion Amendment? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pirate Smile (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 08:23 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. I think we are set. From what I've seen before, I think the Stupak Amendment is going to pass. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 08:26 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. But I thought we didn't need it, and if we don't need it, I don't want it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 08:26 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. Pro life or pro foetus? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 08:27 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Exactly!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:56 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC