Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gee, funny that republican men are so passionate against abortion, and also against welfare /nt

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 08:10 PM
Original message
Gee, funny that republican men are so passionate against abortion, and also against welfare /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
47of74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. The RTL crowd believes in the sancity of human life from the moment of conception...
...to birth. Afterward said human life can go and F you know what itself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. And, let's face it, "sanctity of life" has jack shit to do with these men's beliefs.
It's all about controlling the wimmenfolks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. I had this argument the other day with RW coworkers
They said the Dems only support killing babies....and I replied, "And the Repugs don't give a shit about the babies, once they are born. Repugs believe the babies need to pull themselves up by their bootstraps and not expect handouts"! They shut the fuck up after that.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. I wanted to punch Smith in the face.
How dare he presume to know anything about what it's like to have an abortion. That old fat fuck has no right to dictate a woman's right to choose. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I am a guy, and I don't think any man in Congress has the right to tell a women what she should
do with her body


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lagomorph Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
20. But then, we've all made suggestions....
:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
get the red out Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. Maybe their God requires the suffering
I think their idea of God requires suffering so Republicans can go to heaven. Abortion can be used to relieve or prevent suffering, so it is no good. A single mother with children who go hungry and unclothed on the street provides wonderful suffering, the kind that can put a Republican male into instant heaven.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. I think you're on to something there.
How can you tell who "God" loves if there aren't differences between people, so if we actually let women free themselves and, thus, put an end to at least some institutionalized suffering, how am I going to know that I am a good little "Christian" if there are fewer people for me to look down on and pity?

hmmmmm . . . .

I was also reading on this board somewhere recently about some Catholic philosophy that values suffering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. Life is sacred--until it exits the womb
Then it's just a useless burden on society and goddamn if any tax dollars should be wasted on it. Let that infant go out and get a fucking job. I hear tell McDonalds gives you a meal during your shift. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. Just looking to their own interests: more desperate women = cheaper hookers
The GOP is ALWAYS the Cheap Labor Party, and hookers are important to their lifestyle, it would seem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. An excellent point, Ma'am
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kansas Wyatt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
9. Did I hear one of them say in one of their admendments...
If a woman ever got an abortion with her own money, then she shall be banned from coverage.

I thought I heard that on, one of the CNN clips. Are they really trying to get that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthboundmisfit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
10. I call it the "Make the Slut Pay" mentality
Or, as another DUer pegged the new Oklahoma law publishing information of women who got abortions, the "Scarlet Letter" mentality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ovidsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
12. They're not "pro-life". They're "pro-birth". (not a compliment)
They will go to extreme, and sometimes extremely illegal measures to keep women from ending a pregnancy. They'll harass family planning clinic workers, verbally harangue and sometimes threaten women (and their partners and friends) who enter clinics, and (to me, something that makes a laughingstock of the euphemism "pro-life") occasionally assassinate doctors who perform abortions.

Their obsession with the preservation of an embryo borders on psychotic.

But after a baby whose "life they have saved" is born, they couldn't give a rat's ass about such incidental things as child nutrition, the mother's nutrition, the housing standards and living conditions of mother and child, a child's opportunity to get good daycare, giving the mother the opportunity to work for herself and her child, and other such irrelevant trivialities.

No, they are definitely not "pro-life". In fact, even the term "pro-birth" suggests that they may have something resembling a conscience. Something that says "this is not about me, this is about the human race". Applying terms like "pro-life" and "pro-birth" to them is patently misleading, since for most of them, this is simply about power. Their eagerness to force other people to conform to what they see as "proper moral behavior". Not to minimize the seriousness of rape, which is clearly a crime of power and domination, and not sex, and is far more serious than MOST crimes committed by "pro-lifers", I think many of these so called "pro-lifers" are in the same general ballpark as your cookie-cutter rapist. They revel in their power to force others into submission.

No, "pro-birth" isn't exactly a good replacement for "pro-life". Can anyone here come up with a better one? Something with a more neutral (ergo, more acceptable to the general public) than "family haters", or "doctor killers"?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kievan Rus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. And pro-birther too
Edited on Sat Nov-07-09 09:03 PM by Kievan Rus
The other context of the word "birth" with these people are the thinly-veiled racist birther crap.

My goodness, I despise social conservatives. I can tolerate economic cons and national-defense cons, but I just can't stand the racist, misogynist, homophobic, xenophobic, anti-Catholic, anti-Semitic, anti-Muslim crap those morans spout.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ovidsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. You and me both
There is usually a smidgen of a logical argument that can be found in the rantings of your "economic-cons" and "national defense" cons".

But the ones who base the foundation of their so called neo-con leanings on their belief that "those others" (blacks, Asians, women, gays, Muslims or people of other faiths who don't embrace "their" version" of Christianity) need to either convert to the "cause" or be put in their "place" just make me sick.

They have no legal, moral or ethical leg to stand on. But you can't tell them that, because in their eyes, their "perfect".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #12
21. Replacement for 'pro-life' and 'pro-birth': FORCED BIRTHERS
They want to force births, but care not for life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
14. It's not hypocrisy. It's not coincidental, either.
They love giving the double-bind to people. They do it on purpose - and any chance they get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
16. They have their reasons. High birth rates especially among the poor=cheap labor!

For the corporate masters. Which dovetails into their anti-immigration stance. They believe that if they can just force enough women to bear children for the slave factory they can halt immigration. They aren't moral enough to just oppose corporate slavery and exploitation. They LOVE the corporate state more than they love their "way of life".

Globalization and so called "free trade agreements" have caused everything they hate but they still support it because they're married to "free market capitalism".

High birth rates also feed the cannon fodder factory. They need to be at war constantly and that requires a lot of children to "sacrifice" to the war machine.

It really has NOTHING to do with life at all!

They're totally full of shit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
18. They would also be against health care for all the children born
What they really want is a lot of poor people who will sign up for the military having nothing else to do so they can continue with their unnecessary wars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mstinamotorcity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
19. Any man who
designates himself as the womb police can get back with me in a month with thirty eight days.I took my daughter to a clinic that performed abortions,they also did teen counseling on family planning,birth control, and wide range of female and male issues. As we approached the parking lot i saw the old people with the pictures of the fetus and the baby stroller walking back and forth. Soon as we got out of the car they put some super unleaded in their walk and came up to us screaming don't kill your baby, don't kill your baby. That shit made me so mad because they just assumed that one of us was having an abortion. I told that b---h, Look i already have twelve kids and this is number thirteen. Thirteen is an unlucky number this little m-----f----r got to go. And as i was going inside the lady was saying i was crazy. But that old bitch who looked like she hadn't had a fertile egg in fifty years, is the crazy person if she thinks my ass got thirteen kids. Smile
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theHandpuppet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
22. Not really
If you keep women poor and pregnant, you can control them. They are terrified of women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
23. To be fair, so are Republican women. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC