Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reid Continues To Target Republican Obstruction

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 10:47 AM
Original message
Reid Continues To Target Republican Obstruction
Reid Continues To Target Republican Obstruction
Brian Beutler | November 6, 2009, 5:12PM


Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid is on a kick. Personally frustrated, and under pressure from the left, Reid has decided to take direct aim at Republican obstruction, and he's doing so in angry terms.

"For anybody watching, what's taken place the last three years knows the Republicans have become experts in wasting time, the American taxpayers' time, the American people's time, and yesterday was no exception,"
Reid said on the Senate floor Wednesday.

Democrats can't pass off all of the blame for the glacial pace of progress in the last several months. With a 60-member caucus, they in theory have sufficient numbers to overcome GOP filibusters of key agenda items, if they could only agree to stay united. But even if they did muscle their agenda through the procedural labyrinth of the Senate, they still wouldn't be able to stop the foot-dragging.

Republicans have threatened to filibuster 58 times this year. Thirty times, they've actually forced cloture votes--and when cloture is invoked, the Senate must usually wait hours before the underlying issue can pass. More crucially, they've also blocked nominations and legislation and delayed proceedings in other ways, all of which waste precious legislating hours in a body that spends almost as much time out of session as it does in session.

This week Reid was steamed that individual members had forced three cloture votes on a bill to extend unemployment compensation. Each of these filibusters delayed progress on the bill by hours, and yet, at the end of the day, the overwhelming majority of the GOP ultimately voted for cloture.


On October 21, Republicans objected when Democrats tried to move the bill to the floor for debate--the filibuster went down 87-13. On October 29, when Reid tried to incorporate some amendments, two Republicans managed to hold up the bill yet again. That cloture vote was 85-2. Later that day when Reid tried to bring the bill up for a vote, a Republican filibuster led to yet another cloture vote. 97-1. When the up or down vote was finally allowed, the unemployment extension passed unanimously, 98-0.

These delays weren't ultimately about the substance of the bill--the entire Senate wanted to extend unemployment compensation. They were based on the fact that Democrats wouldn't allow debate on amendments having to do with ACORN and similarly unrelated issues.

"Yesterday, Republicans used every trick in the book to slow and stall and ensure we can't do important work," Reid said. "Seven thousand people lost their ability to have a check. Maybe it's getting cold."

The unemployment episode is illustrative. It's the logical extension of a pattern of obstruction that has the Republicans set to shatter records.
The liberal group People for the American Way have demonstrated fairly conclusively that the GOP is on pace to double the previous record for filibusters on executive branch nominees set...by the Republicans under President Bill Clinton.

more...

http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/11/reid-continues-to-target-republican-obstruction.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. the best thing Reid could do is resign his leadership post nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
golddigger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yep...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharp_stick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Yeah, that would sure speed things up
I'm sure the pukes would just hop right on board and allow votes for a new majority leader. The person in the leaders chair means nothing to the repukes and it doesn't matter who it is the same delaying tactics are still going to be allowed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rectangle Donating Member (437 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
7.  To be replaced by Bernie Sanders, or Barbra Boxer!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
3. i suspect harry's only motivation is re-election
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Sounds like it could be actual frustration. The rethugs are stalling
everything, even issues they eventually vote on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. i hope so, but harry has given little to hope for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC