Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Radioactive waste near New Mexico water supply not a health risk, officials say

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-06-09 12:43 PM
Original message
Radioactive waste near New Mexico water supply not a health risk, officials say

http://www.smartplanet.com/business/blog/smart-takes/officials-say-radioactive-waste-near-new-mexico-water-supply-not-a-health-risk/1875/


Radioactive waste is seeping from mountain burial sites in the canyons of northern New Mexico and moving toward the area’s springs and streams, but officials insist it’s not a health risk

-snip-

The nuclear waste from the production of those weapons was buried deep within mountains in the area. But the L.A. Times reports that the mountains haven’t contained the waste, some of which has trickled down to the Rio Grande, a vital water resource for the Southwest.

Unsafe concentrations of organic compounds — such as perchlorate, used to make rocket propellent, and radioactive byproducts of nuclear fission — have been found in runoff in canyons that drain into the river, according to the report.

-snip-

Here’s a frightening quote from the story:

“When you see a child’s footprints and Tonka toys in canyons where there is plutonium, there is reason to believe that a lot more work needs to be done to make the environment safe,” said Ron Curry, secretary of the New Mexico Environment Department.

In 2002, the department issued a cleanup order for the sites, but lab officials resisted the order for years before agreeing to a revised plan to clean about 2,000 contaminated sites by 2015.

-snip-

More evidence has been found. The L.A. Times report notes that unsafe levels of DEHP, an organic compound used in plastics and explosives, were found in an aquifer and high concenetrations of plutonium were found after an area water main stirred up sediment.
-snip-
-----------------------------

just because you can't smell, taste or see it doesn't mean its not there.

and the damage done to children isn't always identified as coming from the poisons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-06-09 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. I can't help but think that radioactive ANYTHING is a health risk. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. There is natural radioactivity all around you.
There is Carbon-14 in the air we breath. Potassium-40 (the most common source of radiogenic mutation) in our bones, Radon coming up from the granite under your feet, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheflow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-06-09 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. This is just stupid beyond belief!
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberation Angel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-06-09 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. Nuclear waste is leeching into the groundwater at some nuclear plants
The waste stored on site is getting into the groundwater under at least one plant that I am aware of at a decommissioned nuclear power plant. My cousins both died of brain cancers (they lived downstream) in their early forties. Two beautiful women with beautiful kids.

Horrible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberation Angel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-06-09 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. One nuke plant used radioactive soil and used it for a little league field
Edited on Fri Nov-06-09 01:52 PM by Liberation Angel
This is a national problem anywhere there are nuclear plants and storage of waste. It is practically inevitable as the shit must be stored for more than 200,000 years (hell, history is only 10,000 years so far)

http://docs.google.com/gview?a=v&q=cache%3AN1sAtGAZ7SQJ%3Awww.nukewatch.com%2FWisconsinsdebate%2Fgroundwatercontamination1.pdf+Haddam%22+%22connecticut+yankee%22+%22Nuclear+waste%22+groundwater&hl=en&gl=us&sig=AFQjCNFgYnthSOXwT__53ptMRsogb2DaZA&pli=1

I did a google search on such contamination and it is truly scary:

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&client=safari&rls=en&num=100&ei=EW70StSRLIOnlAfDtOW1Aw&sa=X&oi=spell&resnum=0&ct=result&cd=1&ved=0CAYQBSgA&q=Haddam%22+%22connecticut+yankee%22+%22Nuclear+waste%22+groundwater&spell=1

This is the plant my two female cousins who both died of brain cancer lived downstream from (within ten miles) --- they both lived next to the water downstream. They were both in their early forties with two young children each.

It is one reason I fight so hard or these issues to be heard here and understood.

The nuclear industry KILLS.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-06-09 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
5. You should repost this in the environmental/energy forum...
the wolves will come out to get you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I raised, trained, showed Akitas - I'm not scared of wolves


but thanks for caring.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Good answer. :) cheers! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
7. ...and water is scarce there in NM as it is now and has been.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
9. It's the GOOD kind of radioactive waste. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC