Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gun folks, a question:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 06:45 PM
Original message
Gun folks, a question:
No, it's not a snarky thing, although you would be right to expect it.

It looks like this fellow hit 31 people with two handguns before getting shot. Is this even remotely possible?

Caveat: I've never fired anything that wasn't propelled by air.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Common Sense Party Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. Depends on how close together the targets were, and on whether or not
he was receiving fire.

How many did the Columbine shits shoot before they stopped?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NutmegYankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. Absolutely. A trained shooter can quickly reload.
14 rounds or so per clip on average depending on make and model.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geckosfeet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. If he had 1911 style .45 he probably had 8 rounds per clip.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ernesto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. obsolete....
I have one from Vietnam
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. The army doesn't use those anymore. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'm not sure we should assume 31 were "shot"
Or that all the victims were shot by the gunman's weapon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Good point. "31 wounded" could mean a lot, I suppose. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Lots of return crossfire too. They thought there were multiple shooters.
What a clusterfuck.

This may turn out to be a lesson about what can happen when lots of people are armed in one place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
X_Digger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Thing is, there weren't 'lots of people armed in one place'..
Very few arms available to the average person on base, at least those with ammunition. Why do you think local law enforcement raced into the base? If there were lots of armed people there, what good would Kileen SWAT be?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mosby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. I bet he was using non-nato ammo
steel jacketed hollow-point.

That's how you end up with so many fatalities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. He didn't even get close to the record set by the VA Tech shooter- also a 2 handgun attack
Edited on Thu Nov-05-09 07:04 PM by kenny blankenship
The Virginia Tech massacre was a school shooting that took place April 16, 2007 on the campus of Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (Virginia Tech) in Blacksburg, Virginia, United States. In two separate attacks, approximately two hours apart, the perpetrator, Seung-Hui Cho, killed 32 people and wounded many others <1> before committing suicide. The massacre is the deadliest peacetime shooting incident by a single gunman in United States history, on or off a school campus.<2>

Cho used two firearms during the attacks: a .22-caliber Walther P22 semi-automatic handgun and a 9 mm semi-automatic Glock 19 handgun.<9> The shootings occurred in separate incidents, with the first at West Ambler Johnston Hall and the second at Norris Hall.


from wikipedia

So YES it is possible. Today was a Big Day for handguns, but not a record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
X_Digger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
8. Also depends on how crowded the place was..
.. if there were choke points where everyone fleeing had to pass through.

Wouldn't surprise me though if he fired two shots for every one that hit someone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duckhunter935 Donating Member (777 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
10. Normallly not armed police at the SRP
Few minutes to respond, I woud have thought the soldiers could have subdued him. Could have been more than 150 in the building for processing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dschis Donating Member (350 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. I'm thinking sleeper
Hate to, but Army doctors aren't trained with handguns like that. There's more to this....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
11. Possible? Certainly.
Edited on Thu Nov-05-09 07:17 PM by TheWraith
I'm willing to bet the weapons were Beretta 92F pistols, known in the US military as the M9. They have a 15 round standard magazine. Times two pistols, and if you have one replacement magazine for each, that's 60 rounds that you have. Firing at relatively short ranges, 43 hits out of 60 rounds isn't unreasonable, particularly when only 12 of them were lethal. Speed isn't worth as much in terms of shot placement as you'd think--most mass killings are done with slow, precise fire. Add to that the fact that military personnel within a base only carry a weapon if their duties require it--it's not like a war zone, where everyone is constantly armed.

Edited to add--43 killed or wounded doesn't even necessarily mean 43 rounds on target. There's always the possibility of "through and through" shots, where the bullet goes completely through a person and possibly hits someone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
X_Digger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Or even broken legs / arms..
.. from people being trampled, diving for cover, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
17. A trained soldier in a crowded area with few if any armed security people
Edited on Thu Nov-05-09 07:48 PM by slackmaster
Sure it's possible. Consider that some of the wounded and dead may have been hit by ricochet or bullets that had already penetrated another person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backwoodsbob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
18. yes it's possible
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 06:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC