|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-05-09 03:02 PM Original message |
Poll question: Which decade is the year 2000 a part of? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warpy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-05-09 03:05 PM Response to Original message |
1. The Aughts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CBGLuthier (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-05-09 03:05 PM Response to Original message |
2. It was the last year of the 90's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
targetpractice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-05-09 03:09 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. Hmmm... Really? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CBGLuthier (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-05-09 03:14 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. No, no it didn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-05-09 03:16 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. What do you call the time between 0 and 1? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-05-09 04:04 PM Response to Reply #8 |
13. bc ????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-05-09 05:14 PM Response to Reply #13 |
25. Here's some info |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-05-09 08:11 PM Response to Reply #25 |
36. So..there is no time between 0 and 1....LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PSzymeczek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-05-09 08:53 PM Response to Reply #8 |
42. There was no Year Zero. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
targetpractice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-05-09 03:38 PM Response to Reply #7 |
12. You are wrong... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CBGLuthier (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-05-09 04:13 PM Response to Reply #12 |
17. no,i am not wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
targetpractice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-05-09 05:34 PM Response to Reply #17 |
26. Sorry, friend... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-05-09 05:56 PM Response to Reply #2 |
32. Culturally there's really no good argument that it wasn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sebastian Doyle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-05-09 03:05 PM Response to Original message |
3. Well, if you take the Apocalyptic "end of the world" theory, then it would have to be 2000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lapfog_1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-05-09 03:06 PM Response to Original message |
4. Technically, it's part of the nineties. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-05-09 04:05 PM Response to Reply #4 |
15. yep. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Posteritatis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-05-09 03:07 PM Response to Original message |
5. The naughties. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
librechik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-05-09 03:18 PM Response to Original message |
9. Opinions vary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wounded Bear (665 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-05-09 03:19 PM Response to Original message |
10. The Aughts.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-05-09 03:30 PM Response to Original message |
11. the calendar says the 90s - the computers say the 00s. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigwillq (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-05-09 04:04 PM Response to Original message |
14. I always thought the 2000s (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
logosoco (372 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-05-09 07:43 PM Response to Reply #14 |
35. Thats how I've been looking at it/ saying it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeybee12 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-05-09 04:05 PM Response to Original message |
16. The new millenium started in 2001... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Libertas1776 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-05-09 04:21 PM Response to Original message |
18. Didn't I see this in an episode |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jakey (314 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-05-09 08:19 PM Response to Reply #18 |
38. Lol... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cali_Democrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-05-09 04:21 PM Response to Original message |
19. Decades start at 0 and end at 9 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dana_b (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-05-09 08:29 PM Response to Reply #19 |
40. I'm amazed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
azmouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-05-09 04:22 PM Response to Original message |
20. Since there was no year "0" , the years from 1 AD to 100 AD were the first century. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PSzymeczek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-05-09 08:52 PM Response to Reply #20 |
41. Dingdingdingding! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
endeavourniche (41 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-05-09 04:28 PM Response to Original message |
21. No brainer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beregond2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-05-09 04:41 PM Response to Original message |
22. Each decade |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mariana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-05-09 05:01 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. Obviously, except it wasn't 0-1. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftinOH (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-05-09 05:01 PM Response to Original message |
23. a child becomes one year old on his/her 1st birthday; this decade |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
targetpractice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-05-09 05:41 PM Response to Reply #23 |
28. Brilliant! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mitchum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-05-09 05:36 PM Response to Original message |
27. The 80s...we are still living in that shit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kansas Wyatt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-05-09 09:27 PM Response to Reply #27 |
43. Please make it stop! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Angry Dragon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-05-09 05:48 PM Response to Original message |
29. I can settle this arguement.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
targetpractice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-05-09 06:01 PM Response to Reply #29 |
33. I don't follow... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Angry Dragon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-05-09 07:13 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. Sometimes we dragons talk funny |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughBeaumont (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-05-09 08:14 PM Response to Reply #34 |
37. Not unless you're Pol Pot. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
targetpractice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-05-09 10:29 PM Response to Reply #34 |
44. Okay... I get that there is no year zero... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DireStrike (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-05-09 05:49 PM Response to Original message |
30. 1990 wasn't part of the 80s. 2000 is part of the aughts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Unvanguard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-05-09 05:54 PM Response to Original message |
31. Years are ordinal, not cardinal, so they start from Year 1, the first year. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dana_b (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-05-09 08:26 PM Response to Original message |
39. the ultimate authority: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tonysam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-05-09 10:48 PM Response to Original message |
45. 2000 was the last year of the twentieth century |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:58 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC