Say it ain't so, Hillary:
NEW YORK TIMES (11-04-09): Ian C. Kelly, a State Department spokesman, said the United States was “disappointed” by the verdicts in Milan. He said that because the verdicts were likely to be appealed, he could not comment on the specifics of the case.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/05/world/europe/05italy.htmlGlenn Greenwald reacts today:
The DOJ continues to insist that no American courts can examine past rendition and torture cases on the grounds of secrecy. The Obama administration has explicitly decided to continue the "rendition" policy which led to Nasr's illegal kidnapping, albeit with the addition of anti-torture "safeguards" similar in language if not effect when compared to those in place under Bush (it remains to be seen to which countries these "rendered" suspects will be sent, and whether the renditions will be the illegal kind practiced by Bush/Cheney or the arguably "legalized" form that took place before that, beginning with Reagan through Clinton).
http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2009/11/05/renditions/index.html