Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pro-Choice to Pro-Life: An Insider’s Look Into the Conversion of a Planned Parenthood Employee

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Are_grits_groceries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 07:55 AM
Original message
Pro-Choice to Pro-Life: An Insider’s Look Into the Conversion of a Planned Parenthood Employee
This is a very long article from Daily Kos. The 'conversion' is a lot more complex than the headlines would lead you to believe. It is worth the read.

For over a year and a half I have been a volunteer escort at the Planned Parenthood reproductive health care facility in Bryan, Texas; this particular facility is located in a town home to arguably the most conservative public university, Texas A&M, and is known as one of the most anti-choice areas in the country. Located just steps from Planned Parenthood is an organization that opposes reproductive rights, the Coalition for Life. The fence that surrounds Planned Parenthood serves as the frontline between those that support reproductive rights and those that opposed reproductive rights. This week someone crossed from one side of the fence to the other: the director of the Planned Parenthood joined the Coalition for Life. How could something like this happen? The story is more complicated than the mainstream media is reporting.

LiberalTexan's diary :: ::
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2009/11/4/800445/-Pro-Choice-to-Pro-Life:-An-Insiders-Look-Into-the-Conversion-of-a-Planned-Parenthood-Employee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. Hmm, something seems odd there. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceNikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. This is the twist to the story the majority of the media won't report.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ehrnst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. There is definitely something missing here.
Edited on Thu Nov-05-09 09:51 AM by ehrnst
Norma McCorvey's "conversion" was not very surprising - she's a woman with some deep seated issues about being validated and getting attention When she realized that she could get much, much more of that by going to the PL side, she did.

The head of a Planned Parenthood suddenly "converting" to an anti-choice stance because she sees an ultrasound - yet gives an interview with a PC org the day after she witnessed it?

Only a PL could believe that. They think that supporting women's reproductive choices means being at least borderline sociopathic towards pregnancy and childbearing.

The difficulties with PP that she had...the financial difficulties...something other than "seeing the light" is going on here. Is that the twist you were talking about?


Or this:

"Neither her parents, members of a Baptist church in Rockdale, Texas, nor her husband ever "bought into the pro-choice mission," she says."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sinti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
4. A while back
in doing some research I actually found that parts of the anti-choice movement (organizations) began as proponents of Planned Parenthood, but that was when Planned Parenthood was more about eugenics and keeping certain people from having children and less about giving women power over their own bodies.

I don't have the work product from this research handy, maybe I'll dig it up at some point. It gave me a lot of questions about the anti-choice movement. They don't believe in birth control either, so their agenda just doesn't look honest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ehrnst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. The guy that did "Silent Scream" - Bernard Nathanson
Very questionable medical ethics. And Norma McCorvey, since conversion, has been a speaker at at least one white supremicist event.

Control is the issue, not babies. These people need to be heroes, and as such, need dragons to slay and innocent victims to rescue.

The ultimate victim? A baby - they don't have opinions, won't talk back, and won't ask for equal rights.

The ultimate evil dragon? A sexually active woman who rejects motherhood and the man's seed...

You can see the truth when they say that women that didn't want sex at the time of conception have a right to say no to childbirth.

Control, and fear of women's progress in this culture fuel most PLs.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC