Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why are we allowing the majority to take away the rights of a minority?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Ardent15 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 06:31 PM
Original message
Why are we allowing the majority to take away the rights of a minority?
I've heard talking points like "the population isn't ready for gays to have equal rights."

Well, the population wasn't "ready" for African-Americans to get civil rights either. That didn't stop Congress and LBJ from shoving equal rights down the bigots' throats.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hate radio and the Megachurches have convinced everyone that it's okay
Do away with those and we might be a sane country in a generation or two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VMI Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. It starts with the leadership. The President opposes same sex marriage.
He also thinks the states should decide the issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. I have done a complete about face on same sex marriage.
Edited on Wed Nov-04-09 07:14 PM by sharesunited
I have no adequate equal-protection response when someone asks why polygamous marriages shouldn't be recognized.

So, if equal protection is to be served, the only thing to do is remove marriage entirely from government jurisdiction. As a matter of sanctification, leave that to religion. Otherwise, rights and obligations can be freely established in contract and through estate planning instruments.

Repeal ALL marriage statutes. Or ask the courts to strike them down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. That Still Doesn't Answer The Question Of Benefits...
I also believe that marriage in the "traditional" sense is a religious matter more than a civil one, but that doesn't address the legal issues and advantages that heterosexual married couples have that gay couples don't, including tax deductions, joint insurance coverage, death benefits and passing along property or an estate. Either all get these rights or none. The polygamy or polyamory argument is a red herring.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unpossibles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. There are over a thousand benefits if I am not mistaken
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. I'm polyamorous and I completely agree with you
After seeing the crap the gays are going through, I no longer think marriage equality for those of us who are in polyamorous relationships will even happen in my lifetime. I want my partners and me to have equal access if any of us are in the hospital but the sanctification, as you put it, should be left to the religious. We know we're solid without a piece of paper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. If that is the case, why isnt Obama and the Congress
shoving gay marriage rights down the bigots throat? That would solve the issue. Why are they not acting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrbarber Donating Member (884 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Because Obama opposes Same Sex marriage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wiggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
7. sure seems unconstitutional to me. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC