Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

We might have found our next marriage fight: Michigan.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
tmyers09 Donating Member (706 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 05:49 PM
Original message
We might have found our next marriage fight: Michigan.
State rep. pushes for same-sex marriage in Michigan

Lansing -- In the wake of Tuesday's passage of a gay rights ordinance in Kalamazoo, a state representative today introduced a plan to overturn Michigan's ban on same-sex marriage.

Speaker Pro Tempore Pam Byrnes, D-Lyndon Township, introduced a resolution to amend the state constitution to allow same-sex marriage. Voters instituted the ban in 2004, when they approved Proposal 2.

In Kalamazoo on Tuesday, voters approved by a wide margin a city ordinance that prohibits discrimination in employment, housing and public accommodations on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity. Kalamazoo is the 16th Michigan city to pass such a measure.

Advertisement

"This is ... an economic issue," Byrnes said. "Young people want to go to cities and communities that are progressive, accepting of people and have good quality of life. That's something that Kalamazoo is now going to have."

Kalamazoo residents voted 7,671 to 4,731 to extend the city's anti-discrimination protections to gays, lesbians, bisexuals and transgender people. Byrnes said overturning the statewide ban, which courts have interpreted to include all same-sex domestic partnerships, will be a challenge.

Both chambers would have to pass the resolution to place the question on the ballot, a scenario unlikely to happen in the Republican-controlled Senate. If the resolution doesn't pass, proponents would have to collect more than 380,000 signatures to bring the question to a vote.


(continued at link)

http://www.detnews.com/article/20091104/POLITICS02/911040443/1409/METRO

Time to gear up again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R
And I *LOVE* your sig pic. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unvanguard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't see it happening, unless the margin was very close in 2004.
New Jersey and New York are our best shots. DC too, but our victory is pretty much guaranteed there, absent a Congressional intervention (which seems unlikely to me).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tmyers09 Donating Member (706 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. According to further research, it was 59%-41%,
Not terribly close, but not insurmountable with a good campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unvanguard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Going with a rough estimate of 2% shift a year, by 2010 you might be able to pull it off.
Edited on Wed Nov-04-09 06:20 PM by Unvanguard
But not a sure thing by any means.

It would be interesting to see a positive (that is, pro-same sex marriage) ballot measure for once. We'll get an attempted repeal in California too, in 2010 or 2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC