Um... excuse me, but how is Carrie Prejean a "slut" a "tramp" or a "whore"?

[redqueen]

She's a hypocrite and a bigot, that much is clear.

But... I'm not clear on the reason for the insults quoted in my subject line. By that I mean, I don't know that she's slept with tons of guys... or charged for sex. I suppose "tramp" might apply... for those who think that a woman who poses for nude pics or makes sexy videos is a tramp.

Someone want to help me out?


Oops... and she's an idiot, too. ("Opposite marriage"? Really?)

[ddeclue]

1. Depends on what she did and whether she did it for money

:P

[rocktivity]

5. And also lied about it.

Remember her explanation as to why she ended up posing topless? The wind blew her vest open, and the photog sneaked the shots between takes--though a flash was obviously used because she was never backlighted?


rocktivity

[gmoney]

24. That one I believe

In a glamour shoot like that, the photographer is probably snapping a frame every 2 or 3 seconds, and she's supposed to keep eye contact with the camera, not her nipples. She was probably assured that any slips would be deleted. If she was smart, she would have put it in the release, but even then, that might not stop the guy from releasing them. The photographer might not have even realized it until he got back to his computer and went through the hundreds of frames. If she'd done it deliberately, there would have been dozens of frames where they were fully exposed, not 3 frames of partial exposure due to a slip.

She wasn't topless... her nipple was partially exposed while she was clearly attempting to keep it barely covered with an open vest. It's a beach, there's wind and water, and this stuff happens. It happens every year on the red carpet at the Oscars, but that doesn't mean that whatever actress is involved "posed topless" -- it's simply a wardrobe malfunction.

No, it's not a Hillary Clinton pantsuit, but she was doing a glamour shoot, and that's a typical wardrobe for something like Maxim or whatever. I don't fault her for doing the shoot, and I believe that the slips were unintentional and that she may not have been aware they even happened during the course of the shoot, or had been assured they would not be released.

You can take issue with her for a lot of other reasons, but I'll defend her on this one.

Now, this solo video action, again it sounds like she put her trust in the wrong person, and this should disqualify her from certain "holier than thou" statements. But I don't think it should make someone a social outcast. I'd love to see consensual nudity and/or sex decriminalized in my lifetime.

[rocktivity]

57. But if she was looking at the camera, she MUST have seen the flash going off

because the sun was behind her and the shots don't have her in shadow. And if the wind was strong enough to blow her vest around, why not her hair, too--or did the photog do a LOT of retouching? The bottom line is, she knew the photos existed (even if she was blackmailing the photogs by claiming she was under age), and she HAD to know that the pageant rules said that having done nude/semi-nudge photography disqualifies any contestant. So she shouldn't have entered the pageant in the first place.

See for yourself.

:shrug:
rocktivity

[gmoney]

75. Again, I still find her believable on this point.

Granted, she was not in a monsoon, but several of the shots on TMZ have hair blowing in her face, and in #1 of the linked set, she's actually clearing the hair out of her face when the photographer snapped one. She's also moving around and trying to get in poses where the vest ALMOST reveals, but doesn't actually, so it's natural that she might have slipped up a time or two. She could have easily said "Hey my nipple was showing in that one, delete it!"

Again, to my mind is what this boils down to is that she did not intend for her nipples to be showing in these images, she trusted the photographer not to take images where they were showing, and trusted him to delete any where they were accidentally showing. It may have even been in her contract, and this guy found it would be more lucrative to release the images and risk her suing to enforce the contract. The photographer may not even be the one who leaked them... it could have been an assistant or the lab or an employee of the publication or whomever.

She may not even have been aware of these frames until they showed up on TMZ -- paid models rarely are given the unedited shots to review. This isn't like the Vanessa Williams situation, where she was fully nude and engaging in erotic poses with another nude female model. It's not even Rose McGowan wearing a see-thru dress to the Oscars. It's not even Janet Jackson's "wardrobe malfunction."

It's clearly an accident. To characterize it as "posing topless" is completely disingenuous. There are far worse things she's said that should be used to discredit her. (Not that I think posing nude should discredit anyone.)

Funny how on #11 they do an unnecessary censorship "star" (notice how #12 is the same frame without the star, and you can't see anything... wonder if any of the others are like that?) Just ask Jimmy Kimmel how unnecessary censorship can make even Sesame Street seem filthy.

[Raineyb]

9. And what she refers to others in a similar position to her as.

If she uses the term I have no qualms about applying it to her.

[get the red out]

2. She's just a hateful hypocrite

We should leave the misogyny to the right, they excel in it.

[redqueen]

8. Plenty of people on the left do a damned good job of reveling in it, too. (nt)

[StarfarerBill]

70. Exactly.

Thanks, Get The Red Out. :)

[Atman]

3. Corrected sub line: How is Carrie Prejean "relevent," "interesting," or "newsworthy?"

:shrug:

.

[redqueen]

11. Yeah, I agree...

it was just mindless comic relief until I saw the misogynist insults. Not that they're ever too hard to find.

[FLAprogressive]

4. Because she is.

[Javaman]

6. I don't know about those things, but it appears she's really really dumb. nt

And yes, I agree, a hypocrite and a bigot as well.

[Hassin Bin Sober]

7. She should go back to her house on WHORE island!!

[HughMoran]

10. She said things that made DU mad

...therefore, she's all that and more! :)

I keed! :)

[cherokeeprogressive]

38. Many a word of truth is spoken in jest.

You hit the nail on the head.

[MrScorpio]

12. I like tramps, sluts amd whores. To me, those words are terms of endearment

In my world, those are the cool people.

However, I have no use for bigots and hypocrites.

Which are the only two words I'd use for Prejean.

You're right on, Red!

[Mendocino]

14. Tramps Sluts Whores

Wasn't that a song by Cher?

[AndyA]

20. Gypsys, Tramps, and Thieves (1972)

;)

[Mendocino]

33. Then there was

Slutty Gypsy Thieves Who Got Their Babe, and Halfbreed Whoring Tramps Who Danced With His Wife

[madinmaryland]

27. Tramps, trump Trump and steal his rug?

[Ozymanithrax]

13. She's a hypocrite that gives tramps, sluts, and whores a bad name.

Be nice. One man's slut is another man's wife.

[Warpy]

15. The double standard is alive and well

with the two alternatives for young women either tight assed virgin or total slut. There is no middle ground, I'm afraid.

Yes, she's a sanctimonious hypocrite and a loathsome bigot. However, let's can the sexual slurs in the absence of any real evidence.

[Book Lover]

28. +1

[Kalyke]

62. Brava...

Young women are placed into the two categories you named, while middle-aged women are invisible and older women are either grandmas or spinsters.

I'd rather be known as hell on wheels with a penchant for speaking my mind that a "bitch." A female dog, I ain't. I'm not that nice. :)

[Feron]

68. I completely agree. nt

[StarfarerBill]

72. Bravo.

Well said, Warpy. Whether or not she sold her sexuality shouldn't be an issue; people do far worse for money and aren't derided nearly as much.

Bottom line: Hypocrite, yes; slut, tramp, whore...no.

[RebelOne]

76. Well said.

[wndycty]

16. Its the unfortunate mentality that anyone you don't agree with or like is not human. . .

. . .and therefore deserving of being called any name in the book. I don't agree with it.

[buzzycrumbhunger]

17. I'm not sure, but I think a sex video might qualify

Just read that's why her boob lawsuit failed her, though I don't have a hard reference to back it up right now.

Definitely, she strikes me more as just another hypocrite and not worth the effort to even care, but added to the growing list of fundie "moral" majority fails, is worth adding to the body count.

ETA a link. XXX and plastic tits, really? I guess as long as it's straight porn, it falls under the "okay" column of WWJD, huh? :D

[AndyA]

18. How is she not?

You want to assume she's a nice, decent girl who passes judgement on others, lies, and posed nude because of her love of art?

:)

What's that saying...if it walks like a Duck...

[hlthe2b]

19. idiot, moralistic hypocrite and bigot-- that's enough for me

But, you are quite right... There is no excuse to call her those other misogynistic terms..

[Vinnie From Indy]

22. Agreed!

The rest is just bs that I could care less about.

[The Straight Story]

21. Those terms are ok for women not on our side

or so I hear.

[DatManFromNawlins]

23. How else are misogynists supposed to vent?

Ya can't keep it bottled up all the time, after all.

[Cali_Democrat]

25. Carrie Prejean is the mother of all WHORES

prostituting herself for the wingnut cause.

[dflprincess]

That was my thought

She may not have made money doing it, but she was willing to sell herself for the publicity no doubt thinking it would lead to big money.

[Bucky]

26. Thank you

Good point. We don't defeat the enemy by acting like them.

[Hepburn]

29. Getting paid money for sex acts = prostitution.

A prostitute is a whore.

See Carrie, see tape, see Carrie get paid....

[Chan790]

30. Um, she enjoys sex??

Lord above! We cannot have women who are both sexually-free and non-submissive get away without being tarred and feathered, branded or publicly humiliated...the world just might end.

I say if she wants to have freaky sex with {a whole lot of redacted} where her partners {even more redacted} and do {ibid.}, good for her. I'm pretty sure that Ayn Rand was into some freaky shit too...it doesn't change how I feel about her either. (I still hate both of them.)

[redqueen]

36. That's how I see it too. (nt)

[buzzycrumbhunger]

47. WTF?

"Liking sex" makes you a slut, tramp, and whore? That would make what--99% of us sluts?

Gimme a break--it's the fact she took money for it. . . and especially because she has that personality defect wherein she waved a bible around and pretended she hadn't done so.




Um. . . EDITED because I may have missed the sarcasm implied. Dirp. :+

[Vinnie From Indy]

55. bravo!

Lovin' this post!

[Sheepshank]

31. I suppose we could

contact the religious leaders, the people she says determine her moral compass....and see what they think of the topless pics and xxx videos? I've heard girls get called much worse for much less by those who profess the be moral conscience of their fellow church members.

[Malikshah]

32. Glad you caught the idiot as well. She is a hypocritical, opportunistic, bigoted

amoral, irreligious, vain, idiot.

Beyond that and the fact that I am sure she has horrific halitosis, I'll leave it at that.

[jgraz]

34. Let's not demean honest sex workers by comparing them to this hateful moron

Whores just fuck people for money. Carrie perpetuated hatred against millions to further her 15 minutes of fame.

[KG]

35. misogyny is never very far below the surface at DU.

[mamaleah]

42. No, I think it's a political double standard.

There would plenty of spittle covered monitors if anyone dared call a woman who was fighting for progressive policies and values a slut or a whore.

Prejean is ridiculous and a waste of media.

[dsc]

37. I would never call her any of those names

but I must say that my sense of schandenfreud is very sated right now. She so deserves to have lost her frivolous case and over a sex tape, delicious with a capital d.

[redqueen]

39. Oh I do certainly agree with you about that.

A capital D indeed! :)

Oh to have been a fly on the wall when they told her...

[Toasterlad]

40. I Don't Care What They're Calling Her, As Long As She Doesn't Like It.

[FLAprogressive]

44. +1 yes yes yes

[Stinky The Clown]

41. Pink Princess, when you're right, you're right. And on this you're **absolutely** right. K&R

Making a porno, or anything else we know she's done are NOT acts that make one a slut or whore, or even a tramp.

[redqueen]

43. Awww

now look what you did... you went and gave me the warm fuzzies. :hug:

[Drunken Irishman]

45. Your problem is assuming those words are a bad thing.

:P

[mrbarber]

46. I don't think several people are actually anuses..

But I routinely call them assholes anyway.

[Cerridwen]

48. Oh, puhleeze. It's not like someone said

Democrat Party or talked about angry liberals.

Geez. Get some perspective here. Words ONLY count when it's about Democrats.

Do ya NEED the sarcasm thingy here? Then click the "Smilies lookup table" link.

[Stinky The Clown]

49. ....

Here. Use mine.

:sarcasm:

Cuz sure as shit someone won't get it.

:hi:

[Cerridwen]

50. I. Love. You!

LOL

:hi:

[wildflower]

51. Thanks, redqueen

:hi:

[Odin2005]

52. Misogyny is perfectly OK on DU, as usual.

:puke:

[ChairmanAgnostic]

53. cucumbers are not just for salad anymore. Really.

and carrots? Well, I had no idea.

As for turnips and tomatoes, well, that was a body double.

[peekaloo]

58. a message for the kiddies

eat your vegetables before they eat you!

[JanMichael]

54. OK. How do you like this? Hypocritical bottom dwelling scummy

homophobic seemingly trashy dumb shit?

Is that better?

[redqueen]

56. Are those insults which you used based on a sexist double-standard?

Well okay then.

[blondeatlast]

78. I do. With your permish, I'd like to put that on my clipboard.

:rofl:

[peekaloo]

59. from now on I'll call her a MasturHater.

[Taverner]

60. They only way she's a "whore" is in the sense that she's a hypocrite

And yeah, I get what you mean

Use the right descriptors, people!

[comtec]

65. Considering the evil she's done...none of those words are even close to a fair description

i mean really, we're going to have to start using the gop people's names to start describing their evil acts, as the english language - if we stay pc about it - is just not capable of proper descriptions.

Even so, calling her a whore is a smear on the name of all the hard working ladies of the night and escorts who ARE trying to make a living!

I would just say this however... her boobs are fake, bought and paid for by the miss america committee.

and lord knows what those poor girls have to do to get that high up. evil thing that entire program is!

[LatteLibertine]

61. I don't care for her views at all

and I not a fan of sexual repression and puritanism either. Leave attaching guilt, shame and fear to sexuality or normal sexual impulses to Republicans. The double standard does suck. Often men are studs and women are "whores" for precisely the same activity. A woman that chooses to sleep with a man she finds attractive isn't a "slut", she likely has a normal sexuality. If she's sleeping with everyone without discretion she has some issues.

As far as porn goes, I'm not a big fan of it because often the women who "willingly" get involved in it were sexually abused as children and may be snared in drug use to boot. Of course that's not all of them.

For me it's more accurate to describe her as dim, and hypocritical.

[redqueen]

63. I agree with you about porn...

and that goes for prostitution as well in many if not most cases.

[SidDithers]

64. She's not. It's just more judging by DU's resident moral majority...

I hadn't realized that so many liberals were so damned uptight.

Sid

[hfojvt]

66. depends on how you define those terms

I thought these were their standard definitions when used by

men: "an attractive woman who has had sex with other men, but probably isn't gonna have sex with me"

women: "all the attractive men are paying attention to her instead of me"

fundies: "nobody should have sex, ever, unless they are a) married AND b) trying to make a baby"

[redqueen]

67. *roffle*

:)

[supernova]

69. What's highly stupid

is still having "beauty pageants" supposedly in an age when we are on the path to gender equality.

What's even more stupid is having this outmoded old-fashioned, straight laced morality aspect to these pageants.

Does anybody really believe that most of these young women only live with their grandmas and go to church on Sunday?

I think if our society is still going to make room for pageants then they should drop the expectation that the contestants are still going to be virginal. Either that or leave them to the 12 year olds.

edit: Spelling

[redqueen]

71. Hear hear!

But as long as women keep signing up for these 'dog shows for females' as I call them, I doubt they'll stop.

When you mentioned 12-year-olds you reminded me of this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y0zbf9X7SDM

[supernova]

73. LOL!

That was frightening.

:D

If we don't resolve that conflict, young women like Ms Prejean will always be in a bind between being a normal human being (with atrocious ideas about gov't) and an idealized, made-up doll onto whom other people project their fantasies.

[TexasObserver]

74. Recommend

[retread]

77. Who?? n/t