Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If ME religious folks want to treat homosexuality as a sin, shouldn't it be the same for ME Lobsters

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 10:55 AM
Original message
If ME religious folks want to treat homosexuality as a sin, shouldn't it be the same for ME Lobsters
If THIS is why these religious nutjobs are against gay marriage:


Leviticus 18:22
22 " 'Do not lie with a man as one lies with a woman; that is detestable.


Then why aren't we doing the same with their Lobsters?



Leviticus 11:9-12 -
9These shall ye eat of all that are in the waters: whatsoever hath fins and scales in the waters, in the seas, and in the rivers, them shall ye eat.

10And all that have not fins and scales in the seas, and in the rivers, of all that move in the waters, and of any living thing which is in the waters, they shall be an abomination unto you:

11They shall be even an abomination unto you; ye shall not eat of their flesh, but ye shall have their carcases in abomination.

12Whatsoever hath no fins nor scales in the waters, that shall be an abomination unto you


Isn't Maine known for their Lobsters? I remember when I was a kid and back in the late 70s, early 80s - Idaho was trying to pass a law or something that was extremely harsh when it came to women's right. To fight back we protested their potatoes. Why can't we do the same with Maine's Lobsters. I mean their same bible (and bad interpretation of it) says that gays are bad. So why aren't we treating their Lobsters in the same exact manner?

I say boycott Maine Lobsters
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Frances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. Unless someone shows me that the people who collect
and sell lobsters voted against marriage equality, I don't want to boycott Maine products. After all, a very large number of voters in Maine voted FOR marriage equality.

I don't want to hurt these people who voted the way I voted on the issue in California. Why punish me for what other people did? Not only did I vote for marriage equality, but I persuaded my husband to do the same. And I babysat for my daughter and her husband so they could go and vote for marriage equality as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. But what if these were voters who didn't bother to vote
or didn't bother to correct their friends if they knew they might vote against civil rights.

The point of a protest is to affect everyone. If I owned a Lobster business in Maine and my business was threatened, you better believe I'd be out there fighting even harder to correct the issue
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sinti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Don't boycott - demand a ban on them.
You won't hurt anybody, they're not going to do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
2. If loving lobster is wrong I don't want to be right
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sinti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
3. If nothing else to make it clear that we don't base civil law
on Biblical teachings - or that of any other philosophical work. Laws are supposed to be designed to protect the people as a whole, while infringing as little as possible on the right of the individual. By that basis, they just broke the whole spirit of "law" in this nation.

If nothing else, use it as a form of ridicule, to point out their ridiculousness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Very very good point
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laf.La.Dem. Donating Member (924 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
6. We pick and choose
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
8. As noted elsewhere, only applies to jews, not christians/catholics
Ask Rabbi Lerner
Noahide Laws - Can Gentiles Eat Lobster?

Question

Are gentiles permitted to eat lobster which is prepared by placing a live lobster in boiling water? Lobsters are considered sheratzim and therefore the law of ever min ha-chai may not apply. However, causing so much pain (tzar baalei chayim) to a living creature may be a violation of the seven Noachide laws.

Answer

Great question!! Lobster is a forbidden species for Jews to eat. While non-Jews are not forbidden to eat lobster, perhaps the way in which it is prepared, at great pain to the lobster, should make them forbidden to followers of the Noachide Laws.

Best Wishes,

Rabbi Barry Dov Lerner
Foundation for Family Education (FFFE)


---There are a lot of things in the OT that only apply to jews.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. When I was growing up eons ago,
people thought that they were direct descendants of Adam and Eve and therefore they thought they should obey everything in the Bible.

I remember how long I puzzled over the story of God ordering a man to chop off the head of his son and how God only intervened as the man was about to kill the son. At some point, I decided that if I tried to go exactly by the Bible the way the majority of the people in my town said they thought everyone should do, I'd go crazy and do some very horrible things, all in the name of God.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. The point is this - anyone who actually read and understands the bible just a little bit....
knows that the whole purpose of Jesus was to trash all those arcane laws in the Old Testament. Jesus pretty much gave a :thumbsup: to the Ten Commandments (which are all common sense) along with 'Love one Another' and 'Treat others how you would want to be treated'.

So the fact that CHRISTIANS would be those scriptuures out from Leviticus and use them as modern day laws just blows my mind. And although there is nothing that forbades me from eating Lobster, I personally think it's a sacrifice that should be made to show solidarity for other people being treated just as shabbily thanks to poor interpretation of the bible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. I agree and understand
Myself, I boycott churches :)

Too many pick and choose which things they think god considers sin.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
10. nah...tell them paul was homosexual that hated women...
that should fry their circuits.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC