Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Carly Fiorina will run against Barbara Boxer in California Senate race

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 10:51 AM
Original message
Carly Fiorina will run against Barbara Boxer in California Senate race
I would hope that California realizes what a mess she made with HP, and I would hope progressives would remember her campaign for mccain, and how she pushed off-shoring jobs, and more H1B visas


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. Carly Fironia
will lose BADLY. Boxer is still well-liked and well-respected in California.

Hawkeye-X
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. It is mixed for Senator Boxer, however I agree with you, Boxer should win easily
because Fironia is not popular in this state



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
3. Boxer isn't in any trouble with the Progressives.
We actually LOVE her. Boxer doesn't have anything to worry about with the Greens either. She'll have a solid base of support. Feinstein, however, should she run again, is another story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
4. Aren't the words "Failure" and "Carly Florina" synonyms? Or am I thinking of "Golden Parachute"?
Seriously, I don't know what this ideologue has to offer anybody.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
haele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
5. Yeay Carly - leading one of the first major companies to go bust in California
Edited on Wed Nov-04-09 11:17 AM by haele
Drove the HP and Lucent product lines into the ground by creating a virtual profit shareholder empire based on acquisition, off-shoring, and spin-offs rather than production and resulting in 10's of thousands of lay-offs. No company has really wanted to touch her for a good 5 years or so; she had to re-image herself as a "CEO consultant" and network like hell to start getting taken seriously again. That's probably why she is willing to raise her blow-dried head above the corporate lobby/think tank pit she's been hiding in - she thinks 4 years is long enough for Californians to forget how badly she screwed a company that would have been a major middle-class jobs employer in the state. Globalization is her mantra. Protectionism stifles innovation. Minimum wage is a perfectly reasonable place to start a workforce that requires skills and training. Hire more H1B workers, that helps a company's ability to compete. If workers want benefits, they can buy them. Pensions are a thing of the past, they can purchase company stock and manage their own retirement plans -
But she needs - and deserves - her perks and her golden parachute, even if she's made poor management and financial decisions that drove her company's market share, reputation, and stock down to half of what it was before she took her board position and became "the most powerful businesswoman in America". And drove Compaq, HP, and EDS into a ditch that it took her removal to pull those companies out of.

Princess Carly has had less contact with the average working Californian in her privileged life than Arnie did - which is odd as she started out managing production lines out of college. She has shown over the years that she is perfectly willing to set workers and customer needs to the side for "the corporations", as they aren't really people, they are tools in her personal boardgames.

Haele
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stanwyck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
6. What exactly are Fiorina's qualifications?
The Boxer team has to be cheering this decision. Fiorina was McCain's financial affairs adviser. Well, we know how well that went. Plus, her own track record smacks of the same incompetence we've seen 24/7 since the financial community collapsed over a year ago. What exactly is Fiorina's rationale for believing she is qualified? Or, like Palin, does she just think she's just so wonderful people should vote for her...qualifications be damned? Narcissistic personality disorder seems to be the foremost GOP qualification for office.
I LIKE me. YOU should like me.
Case closed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
7. I don't worry about Boxer.
Interesting that Fiorina wants to waste her chance on an almost certainly losing bid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NV Whino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
8. !
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullwinkle428 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
9. Thank you for my "big laugh of the day"!
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC