Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Joint Chiefs' concern about soldiers' dwell time means only 15,000 troops ready for Afghanistan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 10:48 AM
Original message
Joint Chiefs' concern about soldiers' dwell time means only 15,000 troops ready for Afghanistan
from Robert Naiman at HuffPo: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-naiman/joint-chiefs-dont-mess-wi_b_345243.html


If you think there's a house-on-fire emergency demanding that President Obama send 40,000 more troops to Afghanistan right away (is your name Fred Kagan?) you don't just have a problem with President Barack Obama. You have a problem with the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

The Wall Street Journal reports:

At a White House meeting Friday, the Joint Chiefs of Staff urged President Barack Obama to send fresh troops to Afghanistan only if they have spent at least a year in the U.S. since their last overseas tour, according to people familiar with the matter. If Mr. Obama agreed to that condition, many potential Afghanistan reinforcements wouldn't be available until next summer at the earliest.

A recent study by the Institute for the Study of War, a Washington think tank, concluded that the U.S. has only three Army and Marine brigades - about 11,000 to 15,000 troops - capable of deploying to Afghanistan this year after spending at least 12 months back in the U.S.

Like every other patriotic American, I want to support our troops. If the Joint Chiefs say our troops need twelve months at home before being sent to Afghanistan, I think we better do what they say.


read more at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-naiman/joint-chiefs-dont-mess-wi_b_345243.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. With close to 1.5 million active duty and a similar number of reserve
Why does the DoD have such trouble sending troops to Iraq and Afghanistan?

Empty out the Pentagon and send them all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. overstretched
overextended

It takes about 3-5 years to train, and equip new forces for the battlefield.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. It can't take 3-5 years to train
Most enlistments are for less than 5 years.

The draft was for 2 years IIRC. In 2 years you were trained, deployed, sent home and mustered out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
3. Don't forget the National Guard is still in the deployment business.
I think that's the first time since Vietnam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. right
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC