Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The RW has been starting preemptive claims of fraud for days

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Are_grits_groceries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 05:27 PM
Original message
The RW has been starting preemptive claims of fraud for days
What's New? Lacking Evidence, Conservatives Again Stoke Voter Fraud Fears

Another election, another boatload of evidence-free Republican claims of voter fraud...

In part because it's the closest of the major races, the New Jersey governor's race has been the focus of the GOP's dire warnings. Here's how the campaign to stoke fears over voter fraud in the Garden State has ramped up in recent days:

• First, Jim Geraghty of National Review sounded the alarm last Thursday: State Democrats, he fretted, had asked that absentee voters whose signatures on their ballot request form didn't match that on their registration form -- 2300 people in all -- be given provisional ballots, rather than have their votes thrown out if they couldn't be contacted by local election officials . Geraghty warned: "Suspicious minds see the as an attempt to create a pool of emergency votes to be used if Christie holds a small lead on Election Night."

<snip>

• Then yesterday, Fox picked up the torch, with a lengthy segment on the threat of voter fraud not just in New Jersey but around the country, entitled: "How easy is it to steal an election with absentee ballots?" The only tangible new piece of evidence that Fox came up with was this: a former Denver Elections Commissioner, who now runs a website devoted to stoking fears about corrupt elections, told viewers that some people shoveling her driveway said they'd heard that "six or seven absentee ballots were sent to dead people."

• Then, the centerpiece: A Wall Street Journal column by John Fund, the GOP's perennial voter fraud watchdog, asserting that "plenty of reasons exist for suspecting absentee fraud may play a significant role in tomorrow's Garden State contests." For instance? "Groups associated with Acorn in neighboring Pennsylvania and New York appear to have moved into the state." It goes on in that vein, with Fund echoing Geraghty in latching onto the Democrats' provisional ballot request as potential evidence of rampant fraud.

• Fund followed that up with an appearance on Glenn Beck, where, among other things, he laid out one specific voter fraud strategy:

People are going door to door in parts of Camden with Hispanics that don't have very much knowledge of English, and they're saying, "We have a new way for you to vote, la nueva forma de votar; just fill out these papers.

<snip>
http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/11/whats_new_lacking_evidence_conservatives_again_sto.php

Now Hoffman is starting to talk about fraud right on cue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. We should get them to agree that we need open transparent elections now END BBV Paper ballots Hand
COUNTS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
2. Can't wait for Stewart, Colbert, and Olberman to play with that!
They can just juxtapose the pre-election "DEM FRAUD WARNING" shit against the "Major victory for GOP, FAILURE FOR OBAMA" shit. The comedy writes itself.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC