Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

UK Guardian: Minister retreats after criticising Nutt sacking

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 12:33 PM
Original message
UK Guardian: Minister retreats after criticising Nutt sacking
Edited on Tue Nov-03-09 12:34 PM by BurtWorm
:hide:

It took balls to sack Nutt.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/nov/03/brown-johnson-nutt-drugs

Lord Drayson says attack on Alan Johnson's decision to sack David Nutt was merely his 'initial' reaction and he has since received assurances from the home secretary

Science minister Lord Drayson today rowed back from his criticism of the decision to sack government drugs advisor Professor David Nutt, as the prime minister publicly backed the move.

In a written statement Drayson insisted an angry email exchange in which he urged Gordon Brown to reverse Alan Johnson's decision had merely been his "initial" reaction and he had since received assurances from the home secretary.

"I have spent the last few days in Japan, where on Friday I saw initial reports of Professor Nutt's departure from the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs," Drayson's statement said.

"Over the weekend, I was contacted by various people from the science community and my comments in the email exchange were my initial response to what happened without full knowledge of all the facts.

"I have now talked to Alan Johnson and he has assured me of the importance he attaches to scientific advice and his respect for scientific advice, while being the person who has to take the final difficult decisions."

The statement followed reports in the Sun today that a "bitter cabinet feud" had erupted over the decision to sack Nutt, after he claimed that LSD, ecstasy and cannabis were safer than alcohol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. After Nutt sacking scandal, who's left holding the bag?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogtown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. Is "Nutt Sacking" anything like "tea bagging"?
My joke finished, the firing is total political bullshit.

K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Is the Nutt sacker in hot water?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. In this case, the Nutt sacking was more like douche bagging.
They got rid of someone who committed the unforgivable crime of telling the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flaneur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. Pun fun notwithstanding, there is serious issue at play here.
The head of the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs has basically been fired for heresy for daring to say that alcohol and tobacco are more dangerous than marijuana, that drug policies should be based on actual harms, and that the Labor government is distorting scientific evidence for political ends.

Looks like Gordon Brown and Home Minister Alan Johnson are the real nutsacks here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. They deserve a good swift kick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
7. Johnson v. Nutt, eh?
I thought they were supposed to work in tandem. I guess drugs interfered with performance.

:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
8. Hmm this was posted the other day by someone but moved
As was the story about kraft trying to buy cadbury.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC