Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Should we hold our politicians to a lower standard than most western countries' citizens hold theirs

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Bonn1997 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-02-09 10:58 AM
Original message
Should we hold our politicians to a lower standard than most western countries' citizens hold theirs
That's what's bothering me so much about health care reform. Many other countries' citizens were able to get their politicians to pass legislation implementing affordable, single payer health insurance. Why do we have to settle not simply for less but for WAY less? Even if you're going to argue that it's not feasible to get single payer (given campaign financing or any other reason), that just raises more questions than it answers. (How did we get to a point where achieving something other western countries could achieve wasn't achievable for us? Why are we or is our political system less competent than theirs? How do we get to a point where our branches of government can operate as effectively as other western countries' governments? etc.) It just seems wrong for Democratic politicians to expect that we settle for less than Canadians, the British, the French and tons of other countries got.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-02-09 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. The citizens of those countries have less delusions
About the angry sky God who is concerned about who they are fucking and also less delusions that it is their God appointed responsibility to rule the world through Military force.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-02-09 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
2. i can think of a couple of things -- one is the near hysterical belief that
only incrementalism works in this country.

second is slavering worship we give to the wealthy powerful.
because we think we'll get a piece of that pie.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-02-09 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
3. Because the United States is not Canada, Britain, or France. Maybe we would have been better off
Edited on Mon Nov-02-09 11:02 AM by Jennicut
not trying to be independent. That is not a sarcastic statement, I really mean it. We got independence so we could become...this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-02-09 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. I think the French have been independent
with the exception of a brief period from 1939-1944
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-02-09 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Well if we were still under Britain's rule maybe we would have universal health care coverage by now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-02-09 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
4. No, but the voters have little to say about it. We're given a cookie
cutter slate of corporate clowns from which to select & any Dean, Kucinich or Feingold that stands up for us is quickly marginalized & denies real power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-02-09 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
6. The US is the least democratic out of any of the developed Western countries...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonn1997 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-02-09 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. That's true but what can we do about it? Maybe very little and it's just something to accept.
The biggest problem is lobbying and I can't imagine Congress ever voting for serious reform that limits its members ability to take money from lobbyists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC