Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Michigan makes drastic cuts to education, social spending

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-02-09 04:01 AM
Original message
Michigan makes drastic cuts to education, social spending
Michigan was the last US state to formally approve a budget, a result of a standoff between Granholm and Senate Republicans that delayed final passage one month into the state’s new fiscal year.

Granholm actually signed six separate budget bills on Friday, bringing the total to 15, which combine to allocate an overall $44 billion state budget. In this process, Granholm used her line-item veto 70 times to cut spending by a further $127 million. The largest of these vetoes was a $51.7 million cut for 39 school districts—mostly in southeastern Michigan—that spend at a higher rate than the state average.

The budget includes not a penny of new revenue from taxation, a victory for the Republicans who control the state senate. For their part, Granholm and the Democrats, who control the lower house, never contemplated an income tax increase on the state’s wealthy or taxes on the activities of major banks and financial institutions. Granholm had proposed a series of regressive sales taxes.

The signings appeared to finalize massive cuts to public education averaging $292 per student for most of the state, and nearly twice as much in the 39 “high-spending” school districts...

The state will cut by 8 percent its Medicaid contribution to hospitals, clinics, nursing homes, and doctors who treat 1.7 million poor and disabled residents. These cuts will translate into reduced access for Medicaid recipients. “Some nursing homes with a heavy Medicaid caseload may close,” the Detroit News reports. The cuts to Medicaid mean the loss of hundreds of millions in federal matching funds...

The budget cuts include, among other items:

- Aid to cities and towns down 11 percent, or $100 million in all.

- A scholarship program, Michigan Promise..

- overall 61 percent cut to student financial aid.

- state nursing scholarships,

- the Michigan Work-Study Program,

- the Part-Time Independent Student Program.

- reduction of 0.4 percent for state colleges and universities, which were spared a deeper cut by federal stimulus money targeted to higher education.

- $62 million cut to state mental health services.

- $7 million to fund the Michigan State Fair, an exposition held in Detroit that has been an annual tradition since the nineteenth century. In fact, $6.6 million of the outlay was funded by the fair itself, so Granholm’s veto saves the state a net of only $500,000.

- $5 million in payments to hospitals that treat the indigent and uninsured patients,

- funding for a senior food aid outreach project in two counties,

- a volunteer health clinic in Bay City.


In signing the bill, Granholm said that Senate Republicans bear responsibility for the savage cuts...These protestations are fraudulent. The Democratic Party controls not only the governor’s mansion, but the state house of representatives.

Politicians in both parties are in agreement that this year’s cuts are only the beginning...It is estimated that the new budget for 2010, barely a day old, already faces a $100 million shortfall, not counting the education fund, which is largely funded by the state sales tax. Current estimates put the budget deficit for 2011 at $750 million.

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2009/nov2009/mich-n02.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-02-09 04:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. But what do Rense, Stormfront, Lyndon LaRouche and World Weekly News have to say???
I have to balance the opinions of those "news sources" before I can determine the "loonscape."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-02-09 04:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. yes, michigan isn't taking cuts. it's all lies. go ahead, point them out.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-02-09 05:05 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Try to grasp this simple idea: When a known liar tries to tell you "facts" there's no way of knowing
Edited on Mon Nov-02-09 05:07 AM by HamdenRice
whether those "facts" are true or not. It seems plausible that Michigan is making cuts, but any specific "fact" or "figure" posted in WSWS has ZERO credibility.

They are documented pathological liars.

The OP is full of typical WSWS demonstrable lies as it is, like

"For their part, Granholm and the Democrats, who control the lower house, never contemplated... "

How could they know whether a particular thought never entered into someone's mind?

What typical WSWS Hanna Bull shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-02-09 05:29 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. how many times are you going to do this phony routine, hampton.
Edited on Mon Nov-02-09 05:30 AM by Hannah Bell
the article is perfectly accurate, & you know it. it's straight from the mainstream press, & you know it.

i'd pull the mainstream press story, as someone did for you - was it yesterday, or the day before? but you're not worth it.

your interest isn't in the facts.

why don't you go cheerlead for another bank bailout or berate people because they've not organized themselves into tire-burning phalanxes or something? your stalking is getting old.

oh, & btw: united auto workers = company union.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-02-09 06:05 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. How does the author know the internal thoughts of a state official?
Answer: he doesn't.

The article is self evidently fiction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-02-09 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. which internal thoughts, hampton?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tmyers09 Donating Member (706 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-02-09 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. Yay, I'm not getting my scholarship!
The one I earned a year ago by excelling on the test! What a shame, $4,000 REALLY could have helped too. Motherfuckers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zodiak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-02-09 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
8. Well, Michigan is one state that is not investing in its future
Amongst a few states, now.

Reducing financial aid by 61% promises only rich kids go to college. No matter, anyways because the cuts in public schools will mean that fewer will even qualify academically.

Bravo, Michigan, you just made yourself a mini-third world country. All to protect those rich people's bank accounts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tmyers09 Donating Member (706 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-02-09 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. You can say that again.
And with the already pitiful state that Detroit's Public Schools are in, it pretty much ensures the kids of Detroit will never have a shot at a decent education, and will just about be doomed to poverty. Fuck this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-02-09 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
10. Sounds like California with snow
The budget includes not a penny of new revenue from taxation, a victory for the Republicans who control the state senate. For their part, Granholm and the Democrats, who control the lower house, never contemplated an income tax increase on the state’s wealthy or taxes on the activities of major banks and financial institutions. Granholm had proposed a series of regressive sales taxes.

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC