Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Goldman Sachs bet on housing meltdown -- and won (Fuckers!)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-31-09 10:24 PM
Original message
Goldman Sachs bet on housing meltdown -- and won (Fuckers!)
A McClatchy investigation found that investment bank giant Goldman Sachs made secret bets on an imminent housing crash -- while selling off billions in soon-to-be worthless securities.
BY GREG GORDON
McClatchy News Service

WASHINGTON -- In 2006 and 2007, Goldman Sachs Group peddled more than $40 billion in securities backed by at least 200,000 risky home mortgages, but never told the buyers it was secretly betting that a sharp drop in U.S. housing prices would send the value of those securities plummeting.

Goldman's sales and its clandestine wagers, completed at the brink of the housing market meltdown, enabled the nation's premier investment bank to pass most of its potential losses to others before a flood of mortgage defaults staggered the U.S. and global economies.

Only later did investors discover that what Goldman had promoted as triple-A rated investments were closer to junk.

Now, pension funds, insurance companies, labor unions and foreign financial institutions that bought those dicey mortgage securities are facing large losses, and a five-month McClatchy investigation has found that Goldman's failure to disclose that it made secret, exotic bets on an imminent housing crash may have violated securities laws.

``The Securities and Exchange Commission should be very interested in any financial company that secretly decides a financial product is a loser and then goes out and actively markets that product or very similar products to unsuspecting customers without disclosing its true opinion,'' said Laurence Kotlikoff, a Boston University economics professor who has proposed a massive overhaul of the nation's banks. ``This is fraud and should be prosecuted.''
http://www.miamiherald.com/509/story/1310367.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-31-09 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. get those bastards
nail them to the fucking wall
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-01-09 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. ha , many of them are now in the Obama administration!! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-01-09 01:59 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. get them anyways
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-01-09 02:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
17. I agree. And not a slap on the wrist.
The entire company should face fines and penalties proportionate to the amount of the fraud plus the amount of economic damage they caused with their fraud.

If they survive paying all of those fines and penalties, then they should have to deal with real regulations. Serious regulations with bit teeth, backed by a regulatory agency that doesn't trust them, doesn't give them any favors, and has the authority to block them, break them up, and shut them down.

Goldman Sachs should be facing the absolute end of business as usual because of the frauds they have committed. It is long past the time when they should face justice.

The fact that they own our President needs to changed. We need to get their people the fuck out of our Department of the Treasury and the Federal Reserve. We need to end their influence over this Administration and our Democratic party.

I would not be displeased to see them broken up until there no longer was a Goldman Sachs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-31-09 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. They bundled them, sold them, got the fees then bet against them. Great scam.
Why aren't these people in jail?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-01-09 02:39 AM
Response to Reply #2
18. Because they own our President,
hold most of the important positions in the Dept of the Treasury, have several former Cabinet Secretaries as officers, have former senators as lobbyists, control the Federal Reserve, and have been consistently above the law because of their wealth, connections, and power.

All of that should end. They should be held fully responsible for the full scope of all the frauds they commit, and they should be held responsible for all the economic damage from the frauds they commit too. Then they should be regulated half to death, and broken up into little pieces.

Former Goldman Sachs employees, lobbyists and agents of any kind should be barred from government positions for a very significant length of time, and anyone who worked for the government in any position related to Goldman Sach's business should be prohibited from going to work for them for the same length of time after leaving the U.S. Government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-31-09 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. Thay are beyond evil.
Literally, the scum of the earth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-31-09 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. Civil Lawsuits
At the very least the discovery should be interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-31-09 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. this is a kind of war against Americans
How is this different from a terrorist attack? Millions of people are destroyed, millions of families suffering, millions of homes lost, jobs gone....eco-terrorism. War. That's what it is. A criminal conspiracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-31-09 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. credit default swaps, no secret, nothing clandestine
But very definitely the most unethical thing the financiers have ever done. Well, except to blame this mess on poor people who bought houses for their families.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-01-09 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #6
20. you don't know that Goldman Sachs did or did not withhold information they were legally obligated
Edited on Sun Nov-01-09 08:45 AM by KittyWampus
to provide. So you can't make such a statement without inadvertently end up looking like an apologist. I am not attacking you... just cautioning. I know you as a DU'er well enough that you aren't defending G.S.

This would require an investigation. Federal or State.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-31-09 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
7. k/r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-31-09 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-31-09 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
9. thank gosh nobody from goldman sachs has a high level adminstration job nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-01-09 01:28 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. you got it!!..makes me
:puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-01-09 01:05 AM
Response to Original message
10. That's the game they play.
The Wall Street Journal revently reported the average wage at Goldman Sachs is $700,000 a year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
exboyfil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-01-09 01:10 AM
Response to Original message
11. It gets even better
part of the hedge was assuming a counterparty position with, you guessed it, AIG, who we bailed out to the tune of $180B. If no AIG bail out, then Goldman Sucks would have gone down as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-01-09 01:41 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. They claim they were hedged against AIG..
but they've never proven it. I think it's bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
voc Donating Member (279 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-01-09 02:00 AM
Response to Original message
16. ...And that is the Game. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-01-09 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
19. An insider's game in which the ''bets'' are fixed is called ''Fraud.''
Thank you Professor Kotlikoff for putting it into words and McClatchey for covering the story.

Thank you, too, trumad.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-01-09 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
21. K & R for investigation, indictment, conviction and punitive damages.
Edited on Sun Nov-01-09 11:48 AM by glitch
And the corporate death penalty, for good measure.

edit: and imprisonment for the principals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC