Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

In case you needed ANOTHER reason to hate Lieberman...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-30-09 11:56 AM
Original message
In case you needed ANOTHER reason to hate Lieberman...
...Since no one answered my question in the LBN thread, President Signs Law Giving Defense Dept Authority To Exempt Photos From Freedom Of Information Act -- specifically, which congresscritter brought in the amendment that did such a thing.

Just guess.

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/amendment.xpd?session=111&amdt=s1456
Text of amendment

SA 1456. Mr. LIEBERMAN (for himself and Mr. Graham) submitted an amendment intended to be proposed to amendment SA 1373 proposed by Mr. Reid (for Mr. Byrd (for himself, Mr. Inouye, and Mrs. Murray)) to the bill H.R. 2892, making appropriations for the Department of Homeland Security for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2010, and for other purposes; as follows:

At the appropriate place, insert the following:

SEC. __X. DETAINEE PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORDS PROTECTION AND OPEN FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT.

(a) Detainee Photographic Records Protection.--

(1) SHORT TITLE.--This subsection may be cited as the ``Detainee Photographic Records Protection Act of 2009''.

(2) DEFINITIONS.--In this subsection:

(A) COVERED RECORD.--The term ``covered record'' means any record--

(i) that is a photograph that--

(I) was taken during the period beginning on September 11, 2001, through January 22, 2009; and

(II) relates to the treatment of individuals engaged, captured, or detained after September 11, 2001, by the Armed Forces of the United States in operations outside of the United States; and

(ii) for which a certification by the Secretary of Defense under paragraph (3) is in effect.

(B) PHOTOGRAPH.--The term ``photograph'' encompasses all photographic images, whether originals or copies, including still photographs, negatives, digital images, films, video tapes, and motion pictures.

(3) CERTIFICATION.--

(A) IN GENERAL.--For any photograph described under paragraph (2)(A)(i), the Secretary of Defense shall issue a certification, if the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, determines that the disclosure of that photograph would endanger --

(i) citizens of the United States; or

(ii) members of the Armed Forces or employees of the United States Government deployed outside the United States.

(B) CERTIFICATION EXPIRATION.--A certification under subparagraph (A) and a renewal of a certification under subparagraph (C) shall expire 3 years after the date on which the certification or renewal, as the case may be, is made.

(C) CERTIFICATION RENEWAL.--The Secretary of Defense may issue--

(i) a renewal of a certification in accordance with subparagraph (A) at any time; and

(ii) more than 1 renewal of a certification.

(D) NOTICE TO CONGRESS.--A timely notice of the Secretary's certification shall be submitted to Congress.

(4) NONDISCLOSURE OF DETAINEE RECORDS.--A covered record shall not be subject to--

(A) disclosure under section 552 of title 5, United States Code (commonly referred to as the Freedom of Information Act); or

(B) disclosure under any proceeding under that section.

(5) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.--Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to preclude the voluntary disclosure of a covered record.

(6) EFFECTIVE DATE.--This subsection shall take effect on the date of enactment of this Act and apply to any photograph created before, on, or after that date that is a covered record.

(b) Open Freedom of Information Act.--

(1) SHORT TITLE.--This subsection may be cited as the ``OPEN FOIA Act of 2009''.

(2) SPECIFIC CITATIONS IN STATUTORY EXEMPTIONS.--Section 552(b) of title 5, United States Code, is amended by striking paragraph (3) and inserting the following:

``(3) specifically exempted from disclosure by statute (other than section 552b of this title), if that statute--

``(A)(i) requires that the matters be withheld from the public in such a manner as to leave no discretion on the issue; or

``(ii) establishes particular criteria for withholding or refers to particular types of matters to be withheld; and

``(B) if enacted after the date of enactment of the OPEN FOIA Act of 2009, specifically cites to this paragraph.''.

(As printed in the Congressional Record for the Senate on Jul 9, 2009.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The Hope Mobile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-30-09 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. He's such a mo fo! He's a mole. I want to know how they got Gore to accept
him as his running mate. What base don't they have covered?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-30-09 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. I have to be careful when I post on Lieberman threads.
That piece of shit enrages me. I can't write what I'm actually thinking -- I'd get in trouble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-30-09 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. and NPR this morning was blathering about how he's a maverick
the "McCain" of democratic politics.

Yeshua H. Christ, the guy is as self-centered, self-serving evil as any republican ever was. He's definitely NOT a populist, which means he really doesn't believe in the core tenets of responsible foreign policy or of the founding ideas of America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Electric Monk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-30-09 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. This is about covering up for the BFEE. It's about Abu Ghraib torture. It's about Gitmo torture.
That's it in a nutshell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-30-09 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Makes you wonder whether Obama's election was arranged...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-30-09 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Well, if it was, I never got my check. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smokey nj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-30-09 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
7. Can't have too many reasons to hate Joe Lieberman, so keep 'em coming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbgrunt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-30-09 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
8. joe-hole introduced it, but who voted for it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC