|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Dinger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-25-09 08:16 PM Original message |
What In The FUCK IS This Shit? (OK Abortion Law) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-25-09 08:17 PM Response to Original message |
1. any link other than FOX? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dinger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-25-09 08:19 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. You're Right. I'll See If I Can Find Something Better |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-25-09 08:20 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. I've read about that OK stuff |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dinger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-25-09 08:22 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. And If They Do This Anyone Who Buys A Condom Can Have Their Names Posted Online Too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-25-09 08:38 PM Response to Reply #5 |
13. aw hell no - it's misogyny pure and simple |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-25-09 08:44 PM Response to Reply #5 |
18. Names weren't part of it. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niyad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-25-09 09:09 PM Response to Reply #18 |
23. you know, this is the same kind of "hey, really doesn't matter" response that the earlier threads |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-25-09 10:10 PM Response to Reply #23 |
35. I have no problem with my medical records/and history being public |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niyad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-25-09 11:28 PM Response to Reply #35 |
39. so glad that YOU are fine with all that intrusive information being made public. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-26-09 12:43 AM Response to Reply #39 |
44. So, you don't understand science. Ok. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niyad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-26-09 05:01 PM Response to Reply #44 |
56. I understand science just fine, thanks for the insult. I ALSO understand the woman-hating anti- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-27-09 01:24 AM Response to Reply #56 |
64. Anti-choicers aren't particularly bright. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dinger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-25-09 08:21 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Here's An LA Times Link: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-25-09 08:40 PM Response to Reply #4 |
17. it's an extreme invasion of privacy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
notadmblnd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-25-09 08:23 PM Response to Original message |
6. why don't they just make them wear a scarlet letter sewed on to the front of their clothes? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hekate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-25-09 09:40 PM Response to Reply #6 |
29. That was my first thought as well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nikki Stone1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-25-09 08:24 PM Response to Original message |
7. Rachel talked about this a couple of weeks ago. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dinger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-25-09 08:25 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. I Didn't See The Threads. Been Extremely Busy Lately |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nikki Stone1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-25-09 08:28 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. No problem. I rec'd this thread. :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dinger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-25-09 08:32 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. Thanks Nikki : ) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nikki Stone1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-25-09 08:49 PM Response to Reply #11 |
19. You're welcome. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niyad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-25-09 09:26 PM Response to Reply #7 |
27. nikki, this is one of your threads on the subject that I had bookmarked--it bears repeating |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-25-09 08:25 PM Response to Original message |
8. Sounds like a violation of HIPA laws |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-25-09 08:51 PM Response to Reply #8 |
21. No individual personal data was to be included. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niyad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-25-09 09:22 PM Response to Reply #21 |
26. try reading all 37 of the questions and then come back to us--and explain WHY |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-25-09 10:20 PM Response to Reply #26 |
36. I think the public has an interest in knowing: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niyad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-25-09 11:29 PM Response to Reply #36 |
40. NO, the PUBLIC does NOT need to know ANY of that information--it is none of their FUCKING business-- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-26-09 12:37 AM Response to Reply #40 |
43. Oh, so elections, and policy, should be based on lies? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RedCappedBandit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-26-09 09:23 AM Response to Reply #36 |
53. It is unethical to force people to participate in research. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frank Cannon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-26-09 07:15 AM Response to Reply #21 |
47. If a person is identifiable in ANY way, it's still PHI and under HIPAA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrMickeysMom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-25-09 09:32 PM Response to Reply #8 |
28. It would be a violation of HIPAA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niyad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-25-09 09:59 PM Response to Reply #28 |
33. don't forget--this is the state that has coburn and inhofe as its senators |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrMickeysMom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-26-09 10:32 PM Response to Reply #33 |
59. Quick- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Art_from_Ark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-26-09 11:09 PM Response to Reply #28 |
60. Might have something to do with the "Sooner"legacy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrMickeysMom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-26-09 11:32 PM Response to Reply #60 |
61. Hmmm... doesn't seem to be a ringing endorsement for a state. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
a la izquierda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-25-09 08:36 PM Response to Original message |
12. It is stalled... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shell Beau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-25-09 08:40 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. I sure hope so. This is beyond unimaginable to me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marmar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-25-09 08:39 PM Response to Original message |
14. I feel for our liberal bretheren and sisteren in OK....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sellitman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-25-09 10:00 PM Response to Reply #14 |
34. OK is a red state |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earthboundmisfit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-25-09 08:40 PM Response to Original message |
15. Here are some more links |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ehrnst (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-26-09 09:17 AM Response to Reply #15 |
51. It's a Scarlet Letter law that will cost OK taxpayers $260k + a year |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niyad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-25-09 08:49 PM Response to Original message |
20. thank you--was going to post about this later tonight as a reminder. will dig up bookmarks to some |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niyad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-25-09 09:03 PM Response to Original message |
22. here is one link--will try to find the one that links to the whole bill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niyad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-25-09 09:16 PM Response to Original message |
24. here is the link to the law itself--and its 37 questions-- #15 was my personal favourite |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-25-09 10:27 PM Response to Reply #24 |
37. LOL, when you challenged me to read it, I posted that URL twice in my responses. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niyad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-25-09 11:32 PM Response to Reply #37 |
41. my guess is that you will never have to face a situation like this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-26-09 12:35 AM Response to Reply #41 |
42. A bit about me... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niyad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-26-09 05:05 PM Response to Reply #42 |
57. thanks for the info--but the observation was about the fact that YOU personally, are NEVER going to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-27-09 01:07 AM Response to Reply #57 |
63. I didn't disclose my sex, or gender, actually. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grace0418 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-25-09 09:16 PM Response to Original message |
25. Aside from the utter insanity and complete violation of privacy rights, what about the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-25-09 10:33 PM Response to Reply #25 |
38. Easy. It DOESN'T DO THAT. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-25-09 09:48 PM Response to Original message |
30. Nov. 1st? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dinger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-26-09 06:38 AM Response to Reply #30 |
45. It Has Been Stalled |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varelse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-25-09 09:51 PM Response to Original message |
31. "Abortion rights activists" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dinger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-26-09 06:40 AM Response to Reply #31 |
46. I Know. Stupid faux link |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varelse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-26-09 07:38 AM Response to Reply #46 |
48. no need |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niyad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-25-09 09:58 PM Response to Original message |
32. OK abortion publicity law blocked by court |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ehrnst (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-26-09 09:16 AM Response to Original message |
49. There is a temp hold on it until December: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BolivarianHero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-26-09 09:17 AM Response to Original message |
50. I find it fitting, actually... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ipfilter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-26-09 09:22 AM Response to Original message |
52. Oklahoma likes to reach out and touch the third rail of politics. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
guitar man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-26-09 09:50 AM Response to Original message |
54. That was my reaction too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eppur_se_muova (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-26-09 01:45 PM Response to Original message |
55. Sounds like the Fundie Enabling Act for Rightwing Stalkers (FEARS). |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-26-09 05:29 PM Response to Original message |
58. What purpose does this serve? Does this happen with any other procedure? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-27-09 12:58 AM Response to Reply #58 |
62. Using doctors to gather bulk data isn't new or novel.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-27-09 08:30 AM Response to Reply #62 |
65. But published online for the public? Are these stats for doctors? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 10:10 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC