Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Larisa Alexandrovna: It Is Official, Fox Fabricated The "Denied Access" Story...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 09:43 PM
Original message
Larisa Alexandrovna: It Is Official, Fox Fabricated The "Denied Access" Story...
Edited on Fri Oct-23-09 10:39 PM by Hissyspit
Talking Points Memo and Larisa Alexandrovna uncover the latest Fox News lie. Larisa argues it is a major journalistic ethics violation. Rachel Maddow on Her Show Tonight - The difference between fox and the news is not expression of opinion. Fox is actively promoting and organizing anti-government protests:

LARISA

http://www.atlargely.com/atlargely/2009/10/it-is-official-fox-fabricated-the-denied-access-story-.html

October 23, 2009

It is official, Fox fabricated the "denied access" story ...

Following up on this post, here is what actually happened (RE: hero to Fox" but rather had to use a single camera crew due to logistics.

3. Despite the facts, Fox and the glue-sniffing idiots who defend them, spread word far and wide of the "Nixonian" (interesting how that term suddenly popped up everywhere and all at once, as though a memo had been issued) war against them and Obama's "enemy list" bullshit.

So in short, Fox fabricated a story to make themselves look like victims of a fabricated war on them being waged by the evil Commie Obama. Now tell me, is that journalism? And they wonder why they are seen as propaganda? Stephen Glass would have more credibility with me than these opportunistic feeders and spreaders. At least he was a lone culprit, not an entire organization built around distortion, lies, and ugly rhetoric:

TPMDC spoke with a network bureau chief this afternoon familiar with the situation who was surprised that Fox was portraying the news as networks coming to its rescue.

"If any member had been excluded it would have been same thing, it has nothing to do with Fox or the White House or the substance of the issues," the bureau chief said. "It's all for one and one for all."

A Treasury spokesperson added: "There was no plot to exclude Fox News, and they had the same interview that their competitors did. Much ado about absolutely nothing."

It should be official by now, but if it is not, let me spell it out for you. A reputable "news" organization does NOT fabricate stories as part of a fabricated larger story in which they themselves are the fictional victim. A reputable "news" organization does not attack the leader of the nation for the color of his skin, his middle name, or conspire with a political party to smear the POTUS via ad hominem attacks. A reputable "news" organization DOES NOT allow the business side to dictate how a story should be reported. Fox News is NOT a reputable news outlet. But I did defend their right to access and I would still defend it. That is the difference between ethics and the political prostitution that Fox passes off as journalism.


TALKING POINTS MEMO

http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/10/wh-were-happy-to-exclude-fox-but-didnt-yesterday-with-feinberg-interview.php

WH: We're Happy To Exclude Fox, But Didn't Yesterday With Feinberg Interview
Christina Bellantoni | October 23, 2009, 6:09PM

Adding to the Fox News v. White House feud today is a dust-up over an interview with pay czar Ken Feinberg. Turns out, it was a sort of miscommunication, but the White House adds that if they had left Fox out it would be a case of "Not that there's anything wrong with that!"

The version Fox has pushed all day is that the network was excluded from an interview roundtable with Feinberg yesterday, and that bureau chiefs from ABC, CBS, NBC and CNN came to Fox's defense.

TPMDC dug into it, and here's what happened.

Feinberg did a pen and pad with reporters to brief them on cutting executive compensation. TV correspondents, as they do with everything, asked to get the comments on camera. Treasury officials agreed and made a list of the networks who asked (Fox was not among them).

But logistically, all of the cameras could not get set up in time or with ease for the Feinberg interview, so they opted for a round robin where the networks use one pool camera. Treasury called the White House pool crew and gave them the list of the networks who'd asked for the interview.

MORE


MEDIAITE

http://www.mediaite.com/online/treasury-denies-it-tried-to-exclude-fox-news-from-interviews

Treasury Department Denies it Tried to Exclude Fox News From Interviews

by Tommy Christopher | 6:26 pm, October 23rd, 2009
EXCLUSIVE

We reported earlier that when Fox News was banned from a round-robin interview with Obama administration “Pay Czar” Kenneth Feinberg, the bureau chiefs of the other major networks banded together to thwart the White House. Now, Mediaite has learned exclusively that the Treasury Department, who set up the interviews, denies the story.

- snip -

Reporting on the story has been sketchy thus far, with Fox News being the only network to report it so far. In their report, they also fail to make it clear that it was the Treasury Department, not the White House, who was responsible for setting up the interviews. Neither Fox News nor the Treasury Department has provided copies of the bulletins that were sent to the press pool, which Politico reports were missing Fox’s name. Politico also reports that Treasury contacted the White House about the omission, and in a statement, the White House told Politico “The fact that Major Garrett conducted and interview with Ken Feinberg at a time when all the other networks did speaks for itself…”

TV Newser points out, via an anonymous source, that a decision by the other nets to skip the interviews may have been more financial than principled:

The pool is paid for by and rotates between ABC, CBS, CNN, Fox, and NBC, allowing each network to do quick interviews using the same camera crew. If the White House were to exclude one of the members, the other networks would have to provide their own crew for the interview.

- snip -

Update: The CBS Evening News ran a segment on this story tonight, including a snippet of a Chip Reid White House standup in which Reid says, “All the networks said that’s it, you’ve crossed the line.”

MORE


DAILY KOS

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/10/23/794911/-HAHAHA!-They-Get-Caught-Lying-Again-During-Their-War!!!

Hahaha! They Get Caught Lying Again During "Their War"!!!

by sluggahjells

Fri Oct 23, 2009 at 08:09:22 PM EST

(From TWD)

I have three words for this interview (And if you can't hear it, trust me, you aren't missing a thing at all)

They lied again.

Hahahaha. Shocking, right?

sluggahjells's diary :: ::

Well, I'll let Christina Bellantoni reporting say it all. The clowns at Fixed Propaganda Comedian Network have used this as its latest salvo all day today, in terms of the "WHITE HOUSE WAR ON US" , by saying they were excluded out of an interview with pay czar Ken Feinberg yesterday, and that, (GET THIS) all the other networks came in defense for Fixed being left out in the cold.

Boo hoo hoo.

Only, it was a lie:

Feinberg did a pen and pad with reporters to brief them on cutting executive compensation. TV correspondents, as they do with everything, asked to get the comments on camera. Treasury officials agreed and made a list of the networks who asked (Fox was not among them).

But logistically, all of the cameras could not get set up in time or with ease for the Feinberg interview, so they opted for a round robin where the networks use one pool camera. Treasury called the White House pool crew and gave them the list of the networks who'd asked for the interview.

The network pool crew noticed Fox wasn't on the list, was told that they hadn't asked and the crew said they needed to be included. Treasury called the White House and asked top Obama adviser Anita Dunn. Dunn said yes and Fox's Major Garrett was among the correspondents to interview Feinberg last night.

HAHAHAHA.

You get that. The clowns did it again.

What shows how much losers they are is the fact that they suck at even lying. They can't even lie decently......AT ALL.

- snip -

Bellantoni writes in the rest of the article that the White house will not backed down on the comedy Network still going to war on them with their feeble effort.

MORE

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
democracy1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. great post Hissyspit K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trevjr Donating Member (38 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-24-09 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
45. No one has mentioned the most important
point in all of this. The reason that the other networks wanted Fox included is because it is cheaper. The cost is divided among the networks participating. Now either Fox did not want to interview this guy or they were so incompetent, they forgot to include themselves on the list. So Fox somehow neglected to get themselves included and when the White House was called they were immediately added. The media fell for the false story and failed to verify what really happened. Only the internet found the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. SHUT UP! all you stoned slackers!
Nothing to see here... move along... OBEY...



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. Why am I not surprised? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. 24 hr republican infomercial channel
Now --now-- Fox news is fair and balanced how can you talk about their 24 hr republican infomercial channel like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-24-09 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
22. "NOW how much would you pay?? $99? $199? $500? Well, for an unlimited time only we are offering
24/7 crazy at the low, low price of NOTHING! That's right-- lies, distortion, incitement to violence, even weepy melodrama ABSOLUTELY FREE! Act now and we'll throw in a complete set of freedom tea bags!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jasi2006 Donating Member (544 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-24-09 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
39. This was all over three channels on my cruise ship the last 9 days.
The fabricated story was included in every other segment. Every guest was one who would repeat the lie and fake outrage. Major did try to distance himself from the lie but it was a very weak attempt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
20score Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
6. K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brewens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
7. I really can't see Obama knocking back the scotch and glowering ...
over his enemies list like Nixon did. Fine with me if he has one. As long as he doesn't do anything illegal to attack them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
8. updated nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
9. This is so much more fun than the War on Christmas. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
10. of course they did
they fabricate a lot of stuff
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-24-09 02:24 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. One thing Fox knows is to just keep catapulting the propaganda.
That is why it is an endless vigilance to counter the propaganda, and to shame the MSM when they buy into Fox talking points and journalistic standards.

We ignore them at our peril. I remember when Rush Limbaugh was basically forgotten for about a decade. The next thing you knew, those people who listened to him helped to get George W. Bush into office.

Fox News is counting on us to say, who cares, no one takes Fox seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jbnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-24-09 02:55 AM
Response to Original message
12. Hope that will get some coverage. The story of them
refusing access to fox until they nobly defended theuir brother network was covered and yapped about on CNN and MSNBC. Pundits were appalled of course.

It didn't sound right, didn't ring true to me.
I have a new policy to the "sources say" or unnamed source or just stories that don't ring true.
I withhold judgment. I wait and see. Too many rumors and stories and unnamed sources all over these days, always showing Dems in bad light.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DireStrike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-24-09 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. Rachel will cover it, I bet.
She was talking about it on her show last night. She'll keep up with things she's covered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fla Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-24-09 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #21
37. Unfortunately, the morons that need to be shown the truth
probably do not watch either KO or Rachael. The truth will be told to those of us that already understand what FAUX News really is. While it does our hearts good to hear it, it does little to educate those who have blinders on and hear only what they want to hear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-24-09 06:19 AM
Response to Original message
13. Oh kick kick kick. . WHY WHY isn't this info the lead in to every damn
Edited on Sat Oct-24-09 06:21 AM by annabanana
segment on all the "REAL". .news outlets?


Shorter:

Feinberg did a pen and pad with reporters to brief them on cutting executive compensation. TV correspondents, as they do with everything, asked to get the comments on camera. Treasury officials agreed and made a list of the networks who asked (Fox was not among them).

But logistically, all of the cameras could not get set up in time or with ease for the Feinberg interview, so they opted for a round robin where the networks use one pool camera. Treasury called the White House pool crew and gave them the list of the networks who'd asked for the interview.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-24-09 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Exactly. This is a pretty important story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wroberts189 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-24-09 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
14. Lie lie lie... I get so tired of their BASELESS LIES!!!!!


Its like playing a game of simple checkers where you opponent makes moves that are not allowed.

Yet they do it again and again... busted once ..twice ..three times... it is still in their playbook.


The pubs are going down. People are catching on. A recent poll showed the pubs at the lowest approval in history.


Keep it up jerks... Trot out cheney to remind us of bush .. scare people with big lies that are now shot down in 24 hours thanks to KO and Maddow.

So long pubs. Can't say it was nice knowing you since you have probably doomed us all.

knr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mariawr Donating Member (171 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-24-09 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
16. Faux Noise Lies---24/7 non-stop tall tales right here...hurry nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-24-09 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
17. SO WILL CHIP REID RETRACT HIS COMMENTS AND COVER THIS????? Maybe Rick Sanchez will n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-24-09 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #17
28. Chip Reid needs to be held accountable! Was
he being disingenuous or was he just out of the loop:silly:

<snip>

"And the White House has gone beyond words, reports CBS News senior political correspondent Jeff Greenfield. Last Sept. 20, the president went on every Sunday news show - except Chris Wallace's show on FOX. And on Thursday, the Treasury Department tried to exclude FOX News from pool coverage of interviews with a key official. It backed down after strong protests from the press.

"All the networks said, that's it, you've crossed the line," said CBS News White House correspondent Chip Reid."


<more>
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/10/23/eveningnews/main5415921.shtml?tag=stack


<more>
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x6845267
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-24-09 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
18. FOX kills its parents and requests leniency because it's an orphan.
Idiots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
london calling Donating Member (4 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-26-09 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #18
47. mariawr post #36
I read your post and at first thought your satire was stupid and childish. Unfortunately, it was not satire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grassy Knoll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-24-09 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
19. Christmas comes early for Keith Olbermann.
Can't wait for WORST PERSONS, it will be ALL of fox news. HA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-24-09 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #19
30. I hope this story gets out BIG TIME and Chip Reid and his prissy ass
comments are held accountable. Chip Reid from CBS "news" that fired Dan Rather.

"And the White House has gone beyond words, reports CBS News senior political correspondent Jeff Greenfield. Last Sept. 20, the president went on every Sunday news show - except Chris Wallace's show on FOX. And on Thursday, the Treasury Department tried to exclude FOX News from pool coverage of interviews with a key official. It backed down after strong protests from the press.

"All the networks said, that's it, you've crossed the line," said CBS News White House correspondent Chip Reid."


http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/10/23/eveningnews/main5415921.shtml?tag=stack

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DireStrike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-24-09 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
20. "a network bureau chief this afternoon familiar with the situation who was surprised..."
Edited on Sat Oct-24-09 01:23 PM by DireStrike
a network bureau chief this afternoon familiar with the situation who was surprised that Fox was portraying the news as networks coming to its rescue.

"If any member had been excluded it would have been same thing, it has nothing to do with Fox or the White House or the substance of the issues," the bureau chief said. "It's all for one and one for all."



THIS IS COMING TO FOX'S RESCUE. It shows that the real networks count fox as a network.

It shows that they think they have more in common with a lying, distorting, partisan group than they do with the white house.

It shows that they are ALL propaganda outlets, and their primary interest is not reporting the truth, not even out-competing their RIVAL networks who are clearly inferior, but rather in maintaining their access, and keeping everything exactly the way it is.


It is time to break up the media conglomerates with anti-trust law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-24-09 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
23. So, will the villagers still defend one of their "own"?
Real reporters and journalists have been seen defending Fox from perceived White House attacks. Does the defense continue, with a "Fox said, Facts said" sort of bogus equivalency, or will we be treated to actual factual coverage of the kerfuffle? Fox can whine all it wants (and most certainly does), but are the other news outlets obliged to believe Fox or their own knowledge of the facts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OffWithTheirHeads Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-24-09 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
24. I can't wait to see Billo trapped in a weather balloon
flying across Kansas. FOX NEWZ EXCLUSIVE! DETAILS AT 11:00
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-24-09 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
25. Exactly what the White House
was confronting them on.

What was that about Chip Reid? What's up with his lie?

<snip>

"And the White House has gone beyond words, reports CBS News senior political correspondent Jeff Greenfield. Last Sept. 20, the president went on every Sunday news show - except Chris Wallace's show on FOX. And on Thursday, the Treasury Department tried to exclude FOX News from pool coverage of interviews with a key official. It backed down after strong protests from the press.

"All the networks said, that's it, you've crossed the line," said CBS News White House correspondent Chip Reid."


http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/10/23/eveningnews/main5415921.shtml?tag=stack

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x8712399

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-24-09 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
26. Every news outlet that fails to publicly correct this story is complicit in Fox's
propaganda campaign.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-24-09 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
27. They stopped being news and turned into an arm of the RNC.. once Ailes arrived.
They have been nothing news-like since a republican strategist took hold of the news there. I mean.. how could ANYONE even believe that they would be balanced? They're not. The state of the media today is sad and disturbing. I KNOW that someone has been bankrolling the "tea-bagging" protests, because there were Craigslist ads recruiting organizers and paying them very well in commissions to sign people up. The Meetup groups are big, etc. Someone is footing the bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-24-09 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
29. k&r
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Number23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-24-09 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
31. This is not as cut and dry as some here would like it to be.
According to the NY Times:

"In a sign of discomfort with the White House stance, Fox’s television news competitors refused to go along with a Treasury Department effort on Tuesday to exclude Fox from a round of interviews with the executive-pay czar Kenneth R. Feinberg that was to be conducted with a “pool” camera crew shared by all the networks. That followed a pointed question at a White House briefing this week by Jake Tapper, an ABC News correspondent, about the administration’s treatment of “one of our sister organizations.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/23/us/politics/23fox.html?_r=1

So far, we have Jake Tapper of ABC and Chip Reid of CBS corroborating this story. It may be entirely possible that Reid and Tapper were suckered in by Fox's whining, but I don't think that's very likely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
humbled_opinion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-24-09 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. Well so what is it then?
Is the White House intentionally shutting down an opposition news network? Next the whiners will be comparing Obama to Chavez....

Really!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Number23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-24-09 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. arrgh! I don't know what it means either! This is horribly confusing
The only thing that I do know is that any attempt to discredit Fox and accuse them of doing what they are so TERRIBLY good at doing (obfuscating, lying, manipulating the facts etc.) on this particular issue may be premature at this point.

And the Obama = Chavez comparisons have already started. :eyes: Never mind that this comparison has no basis in anything even remotely resembling truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-24-09 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #32
43. There were defenders of Fox comparing Obama to Chavez yesterday
Edited on Sat Oct-24-09 08:35 PM by HughMoran
I can't tell which way is up on DU at times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mariawr Donating Member (171 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-24-09 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. #23, please. Jake Tapper is a wannabe Faux person.
So is Chip Reid. They got the gameplan from Faux, I'd bet money on it.
Need more sources than those two. They are as bad as Faux itself.

Fox News Lies. Cut and Dried.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Number23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-24-09 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. Well, since you got it all figured out...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mariawr Donating Member (171 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-24-09 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. Here's your Chip Reid.....
http://mediamatters.org/search/tag/chip_reid

A sample of what you'll find at the link----
# Media figures call on Obama to turn down the Nobel Peace Prize
October 09, 2009 2:11 pm ET filed under Research

# CBS' Chip Reid asks Gibbs whether Obama "consider turning" Nobel Prize "down," suggests award is "a partisan thing" and Nobel Committee "supports liberal causes"
October 09, 2009 1:15 pm ET filed under MMtv

# CBS Evening News reports that Democrats say Limbaugh is "whipping activists into a frenzy" with Nazi comparisons
August 07, 2009 8:39 pm ET filed under MMtv

# CBS ignored evidence undermining "double whammy" small-biz attack
July 16, 2009 5:14 pm ET filed under Research

# Media figures ignore facts to claim unemployment rate proves stimulus is "failing"
June 09, 2009 6:04 pm ET filed under Research

# CBS' Reid calls media on "judg politics by how the market is responding"
March 29, 2009 11:36 am ET filed under MMtv

# CBS' Couric, Reid report omnibus is "loaded," "filled," and "stuffed" with earmarks, don't note they are less than 2 percent of bill
March 11, 2009 8:50 pm ET filed under Research

# CBS advances falsehood that Obama's stimulus plan gives "tax refunds for people who don't pay taxes"
January 23, 2009 9:24 pm ET filed under Research

# Media repeat Cindy McCain's attack on Obama troop-funding vote, ignore John McCain's troop-funding vote
October 09, 2008 9:34 am ET filed under Research

# CBS' Reid aired McCain attacking Obama for purportedly being in the "Washington culture of lobbying" without noting McCain's own lobbying ties
September 20, 2008 6:15 pm ET filed under Research

# CBS devoted 5 minutes to "lipstick," other McCain attacks before reporting that "lipstick" attack was bogus
September 11, 2008 4:32 pm ET filed under Research

# CBS' Reid didn't note that experts, including Energy Dept., have rebutted assertion that expanded offshore drilling "will bring prices down"
July 29, 2008 1:36 pm ET filed under Research

# CBS' Reid repeated McCain's statement that Obama "impugn" his motives over GI bill, did not note McCain impugned Obama's motives
May 23, 2008 1:09 pm ET filed under Research

# MSNBC's Reid aired "Strangelove" attack, but didn't note Romney's agreement with Obama on substance
August 07, 2007 1:16 pm ET filed under Research

Of Course (channeling Cenk) Reid AND Tapper are going to give the news a rw spin.
Another Faux Hoax ....among many.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FREEDOM61 Donating Member (14 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-24-09 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. The proof is in the pudding
All they have to do is run all those clips on Fox it's evidents. I think the White House need to go c-span. :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DireStrike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-24-09 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #34
44. What are the positions of these guys in their networks?
Are they nobodies? If so we can ignore them.

Are they important? If so, more proof that the corporate-owned media supports right wing ideals and goals on EVERY channel, not just fox.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hileeopnyn8d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-24-09 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #31
40. That question from Tapper
was prior to this incident.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
santamargarita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-24-09 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
41. Are these Fox Bastards honest about anything?
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-24-09 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
42. HA! That is all I can say.....HA! HA! Caught with their pants around thier ankles once again!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomCADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-24-09 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
46. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC