Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Congress gave itself a cost of living increase raise in 2009, but seniors get nothing

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-15-09 09:08 AM
Original message
Congress gave itself a cost of living increase raise in 2009, but seniors get nothing
Edited on Thu Oct-15-09 09:10 AM by Mari333
Congressional members receive a 2009 salary increase
Posted by legistorm on Thursday, January 08, 2009
Members of Congress will receive an annual salary increase of $4,700 for 2009 as a result of an automatic cost of living allowance that took effect on January 1, raising the default annual member salary to $174,000. A handful of the House and Senate's top leaders make even more than that.












http://www.legistorm.com/blog/congressional-members-receive-a-2009-salary-increase.html


add to that the perks and lobbying money that Congress gets . the millions and millions they get from their corporate buddies.

but the seniors out there living paycheck to paycheck, many of them, get nothing .

and how do they justify this??

oh and here are their salaries: (minus the lobbyist perks)
http://www.legistorm.com/member_of_congress_salaries.html




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-15-09 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. How many working people have gotten a raise every year since 1975? And seniors are living
'Social Security check to Social Secuirty check'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-15-09 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. same thing. Congress kept minimum wage at horrific levels for a long time
whilst continuing to accomodate themselves...
in other words, the people of the USA come last. they, and their corporate friends, come first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-15-09 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
3. K&R
x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-15-09 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
4. Says a lot, doesn't it n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-15-09 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I watch those well fed bastards on C Span
with their Armani suits and silk ties, Bloated faces and high blood pressure, puffy eyed Gout stricken scumbags puffing their lies half heartedly spewing their talking points they receive from their corporate masters.
makes me vomit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-15-09 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. I quit watching them, I can't stand
to see their fucking faces and hear their voices. I find it easier to read what the bastards say, and a lot less stressful. But you sure described them to a tee.:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-15-09 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
6. $174,000 per year is a career - not public service..
And is a big problem for a so-called democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cutlassmama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-15-09 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
8. Congress persons eat steak while seniors/disabled eat cat food.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-15-09 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Would make a great bumpersticker.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-15-09 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
10. seniors get no cola in 2010- this article is about congress' cola in 2009.
apples/oranges.

if congress gets a cola raise NEXT year, and ss recipients don't- THEN there are questions to answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WePurrsevere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-15-09 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
11. Umm.. FWIW that's from January of this year
not recent and it was given the same time as those of us on Soc Security retirement or disability (as I am) got our large COLA increase. So, although I think the way the COLA is calculated is bullpucky it's not like they got and we didn't that time.

OTOH if they give themselves an increase in January of 2010 and we get squat I'll be livid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-15-09 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
12. Members of Congress won’t get an automatic pay raise in 2010.
They voted in March, as part of an omnibus appropriations bill, to deny themselves any raise for 2010.

There won’t be a Social Security COLA increase this January, and probably not in January 2011 either. This is because the official measure of the cost of living, based on legislation passed in 1972, has gone down due to volatile oil prices. Social Security checks have gone up automatically every year since 1975, except for 1983 when there was no increase. This year's Social Security COLA was 5.8%.

Three quarters of Medicare beneficiaries will not have to pay any increased Part B premiums because of a "hold-harmless" provision in the law. This provision prohibits Part B premiums from rising in any one year more than that year's cost of living increase in Social Security benefits.

People who are covered by the hold-harmless provision will continue to pay Part B premiums of $96.40 per month in 2010. But this hold-harmless protection does not apply to about one in four (or about 11 million) beneficiaries who:

    do not have their Part B premiums withheld from their Social Security checks, or

    pay a higher Part B premium surcharge based on high income, or

    are newly enrolled in Part B.
Since 75 percent of Medicare beneficiaries are protected from a premium increase, the remaining 25 percent are going to have to bear the full brunt of the increase in Part B costs. They are going to get hit by significantly higher Part B premiums next year unless Congress addresses this problem before then.

House of Representatives voted on September 24 to eliminate all Medicare Part B premium increases for this remaining 25% in 2010. The bill now goes to the Senate, where the Finance Committee is expected to take it up soon, though no hearings were scheduled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shireling Donating Member (222 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-15-09 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
13. I'll never understand
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-15-09 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
14. KR+13.

this is just OBSCENE.


:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-15-09 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
15. What about 2010 (the year in question)? Still--it seems to be
hypocrisy at it's finest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-15-09 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
16. SS recipients will receive a de facto COLA increase
In the form of a $250 bonus check.

The desire to demonize the 535 members of Congress for their pay is counterproductive. All the super rich folks in Congress probably couldn't care less what their salaries are, they would work for free to have power. It is the true citizen legislators who do no possess vast personal wealth, whose numbers are smaller than they ought to be, that benefit most from the modest salary congressmen receive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC