Seeing the war cost numbers, at some point we have to say that a certain number of terrorist attacks
Edited on Tue Oct-13-09 08:42 PM by RB TexLa
are acceptable. I don't see how we can just keep spending and spending on this. There is no way to justify the cost compared to losses in potential attacks.
edited to add: The economy would adjust to a number of attacks per year.
I heard Al Q was being defeated in Afghanistan and now moving to other countries instead. You have to ask youself what I have I done to deserve a terrorist attacking me? I haven't done anything?
Why doesn't China do more in Afghanistan?
I think the real enemy is actually within the gates.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.