Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A person that deals with Medicare and Medicaid says that these

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
michaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 06:18 PM
Original message
A person that deals with Medicare and Medicaid says that these
two have been the most consistent with denying coverage to those that need the health care the most, especially to Seniors and that they cut completely Hospice coverage for Seniors. Anyone have any info on this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. They said it, so it must be true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. Unless they cut hospice in the last couple days, that's not true.
Edited on Tue Oct-13-09 06:22 PM by Rabrrrrrr
And the elderly I know who have medicare have said nothing about ever being denied coverage.

Perhaps this alleged person is a rightwing fuckwit, who, like all rightwing fuckwits, never has truth on their side and so just makes up shit to make their points, which in this case I'm sure the alleged asshole shitbag's point is "Look, the gummint can't even get medicare right for a few people, why think they can do it for the whole population?"

Tell your alleged person to stop being such an ignorant fuck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DefenseLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. I spoke recently to a friend that used to manage nursing homes
He said that Medicare was good at controlling costs, that Medicare generally had a set amount that they would pay and they stuck to it, whereas private insurance patients generally got everything under the sun at whatever price they wanted (until their coverage was canceled). It was more complicated than that but that was the gist of the conversation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
michaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Would it make a difference if this guy worked in the southern states? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sgent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. Your friend
Edited on Tue Oct-13-09 06:32 PM by Sgent
maybe thinking of Medicare Advantage plans, not straight Medicare.

Also, Medicare does have some wacky limitations like those on outpatient physical therapy that make no sense -- most of these are codified into law, so it shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone who deals with it regularly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Yes, I think Medicare Advantage is the one they refer to.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Those are run by private insurance companies under their policies.
People who sign up for those should be concerned, because those insurance companies do everything they can to increase their profits (reduce coverage).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clear eye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. The two "public" options on the table in Congress now are both like Medicare Advantage
or more accurately the old Medicare Pt. C b/c they won't have prescription coverage. They are both to be privatized, and even worse than privatized Medicare b/c they don't have any gov't administered program that they have to match in cost.

Maybe the person was opposing the proposed "public" option (what Orwellian terminology) by describing the deficiencies of privatized Medicare. That would explain why a person in the business said what he/she did.

The mandates will mean that health insurance will just suck more money out of the economy with minimal job creation. And this monstrosity is being sold as giving Americans more free choice in health care. Just ask Massachusetts residents what they think of it. Mandates would be important to put a gov't administered plan on a solid footing and include members from all risk groups. But, since insurers claim to believe in the free market...

NO MANDATED PRIVATE INSURANCE!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobinA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #7
21. Nope
My grandmother is currently in hospice on a Medicare Advantage Plan. I don't believe that an Advantage Plan can cut hospice, since hospice is part of straight Medicare. Now, the company SPONSERING the Advantage Plan can cut the Advantage Plan, which is happening in my area and to my Grandmother and parents, but worst case scenario she just reverts to straight Medicare with a Part D. They are still researching Advantage Plans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
classof56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
6. Tell the person (or you can do this) to check 2009 Medicare & You
Which details all Medicare Part A covered benefits. This includes Hospice Care for people with terminal illness expected to live 6 months or less as certified by a doctor. Could probably access this information online. Unless it changes significately in the future, right now clients pay $0 for hospital care, a copayment of up to $5 per prescription for outpatient prescription drugs for pain and symptom management, 5% of the Meicare-approved amount for inpatient respite care (short-term care given by another caregiver, so the usual caregiver can rest) but Medicare doesn't cover room and board when you get hospice care in your home or another facility where you live (like a nursing home). I have no information or experience regarding Medicare denying this coverage or completely cutting Hospice coverage for Seniors, but if the person who told you this has examples to cite, I'd really like to know. Have yet to receive my Medicare & You 2010 booklet, but if these kind of changes in service are in the works, would be nice to have a heads up.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindandSoul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
8. NOT TRUE!
As a Social Worker, I have been intimately involved in getting many of my clients (mostly adults with developmental disabilities, or adults with mental illness, or adults with AIDS) to become eligible for Social Security, Supplemental Income (SSI), Medicare, and Medicaid. I have never failed to obtain eligibility for any of my clients and several of them became eligible for medicaid (with a deductible if their income was above a certain level.

While working with AIDS patients, I also worked closely with hospice care. This program is generally not Federally funded, but is State funded, or even funded by the City. However, I have NEVER encounter a case when a person for whom all treatment had failed and had a prognosis of a maximum of 6 month survival was refused Hospice care! However, a person doesn't become eligible for hospice until he/she is ready to accept ONLY palliative care (no more treatments, such as chemotherapy, or interventions, but only assistance with controlling pain, making the person more comfortable, helping the family and the patient with end of life decisions, etc. .), and the prognosis for survival is a maximum of 6 months (although I have had patients whose prognosis was less than 6 months, but extended to 10 months. . . and hospice continued to the day they died.

Eligibility for Medicare is very simple: You must be 65! That's it. No one gets rejected!
Eligibility for Medicaid is more complex and is based on your needs (contrary to private insurance, the greater the needs, more likely you WILL be eligible for Medicaid) and your income (if your income is too high, you will not be eligible for medicaid).

The person making that comment is either an outright liar, or he/she is misguided.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NC_Nurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
9. No. Not that I know about. My mother receives hospice services through Medicare
and so did my husband's granny - who just passed away last night at the inpatient hospice here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
11. Myth.
These two GIVE coverage to those who need it most.
The person you have quoted must be a wingnut who hates the government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
12. My sister did have something denied
to be honest. They put in a birth control device (I think that part was covered), but when it caused her pain and she went in to have it removed, she was charged a lot of money. I think 600.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
13. I have had Medicare for 3 years
Nothing has changed in that time.

However, I have the original Medicare where I go to my doctor and she bills the gov't.

Some people have Bush Medicare where an insurance company handles their care (Medicare Advantage). The gov't pays an insurance company to handle the care. Of course, this way of doing things is unnecessary in my opinion. A person in Medicare Advantage costs the gov't more than a person in the original Medicare. But the insurance companies do profit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
michaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
14. Thanks for the help. This gave me some good info to pass on to this guy.
I am not sure of what capacity he works in for sure but I know he is in South Carolina! Hmmmm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
15. big pile of steaming bullshit
first-medicare and medicaid are two different health care providers

my parents were never denied any procedure under medicare. they had a supplemental retirement benefit that paid the difference in treatments. i took my mom to her doctors visits and she just showed her card and that was it. i wish the hell i had medicare for all my operations and doctor`s visits
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
REACTIVATED IN CT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
17. I work at a hospital and hear complaints about Medicare
not paying enough compared to private insurers and also them taking back payments after the fact. The patient gets the care but the hospital doesn't get paid . So if this person works for a health care provider, they might be talking about payment hassles,not service denial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
18. Dunno about Medicare, but we have done pretty well with the Medicaid. I have had
to get my docs to sign off on certain meds before I got approval for them, and they don't do glasses or teeth, but other than that it's not been bad at all. Certainly cheaper than paying for insurance out of pocket!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clear eye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. Medicaid varies widely depending on which state you're in. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
20. With Medicaid, the biggest problem is finding a doctor who is willing to treat you
The reimbursement rates are very low, to the point where doctors may actually lose money by seeing you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. That is the case with the orthodontists in my area. No one will take it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC