Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nobel Prize for Promises?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 05:14 AM
Original message
Nobel Prize for Promises?


(Photo: Wikimedia Commons)

Nobel Prize for Promises?
Saturday 10 October 2009
by: Howard Zinn, t r u t h o u t | Op-Ed

I was dismayed when I heard Obama was given the Nobel Peace Prize. A shock, really, to think that a president carrying on wars in two countries and launching military action in a third country (Pakistan), would be given a peace prize. But then I recalled that Woodrow Wilson, Theodore Roosevelt and Henry Kissinger had all received Nobel Peace Prizes. The Nobel Committee is famous for its superficial estimates and for its susceptibility to rhetoric and empty gestures, while ignoring blatant violations of world peace.

Yes, Wilson gets credit for the League of Nations - that ineffectual body which did nothing to prevent war. But he also bombarded the Mexican coast, sent troops to occupy Haiti and the Dominican Republic and brought the US into the slaughterhouse of Europe in the first World War - surely, among stupid and deadly wars, at the top of the list.

Sure, Theodore Roosevelt brokered a peace between Japan and Russia. But he was a lover of war, who participated in the US conquest of Cuba, pretending to liberate it from Spain while fastening US chains around that tiny island. And as president he presided over the bloody war to subjugate the Filipinos, even congratulating a US general who had just massacred 600 helpless villagers in the Phillipines. The Committee did not give the Nobel Prize to Mark Twain, who denounced Roosevelt and criticized the war, nor to William James, leader of the anti-imperialist league.

Oh yes, the Committee saw fit to give a peace prize to Henry Kissinger, because he signed the final agreement ending the war in Vietnam, of which he had been one of the architects. Kissinger, who obsequiously went along with Nixon's expansion of the war with the bombing of peasant villages in Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia. Kissinger, who matches the definition of a war criminal very accurately, was given a peace prize!

People should not be given a peace prize on the basis of promises they have made (as with Obama, an eloquent maker of promises) but on the basis of actual accomplishments towards ending war. Obama has continued deadly, inhuman military action in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan.


Rest of article at: http://www.truthout.org/101009A
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sherman A1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 06:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. We are all entitled to our opinion including Mr. Zinn
He has his, I have mine. His is no better or less than any other, it's just an opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MajorChode Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 06:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Actually some people's opinions are more relevant than others
For instance, I can't imagine George W. Bush's opinion being worth much on subjects other than Wild Turkey or how to go far in life despite being a complete fuckup.

On the subject of peace I can think of few more relevant than Howard Zinn, but I can't agree that Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize on promises which pretty much makes the rest of his opinion strawman rhetoric.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sherman A1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. And there Ya, go....
Zinn's opinion may (or may not) be more relevant on the subject, but if he is off on a tangent of some sort, he shoots himself in the foot and it becomes as you say so much rhetoric.


There are a whole bunch of opinions on a variety of topics swirling around and around these days from a variety of sources, but they are still just opinions.


Your opinion and mine are just as valid as Zinn's despite his platform.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demoleft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 06:35 AM
Response to Original message
2. you know - i'm a bit more hopeful than shocked when i see mrs clinton going around...
...instead of mrs rice. and when i see obama speaking of new relationships with ME peoples instead of mr bush in military uniform.

because what zinn calls "promises" i call "hopes" and "hard commitment".
obama and the US are decisive in this passage of history. hope zinn's "shock" will be soothed in some years.
in the meantime, i stick to my position which is: obama is a good choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TicketyBoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 06:43 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I would go further
and say Obama is a GREAT choice!

I am so proud of him!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. mrs. clinton and mrs. rice?
So Hillary gets to be known as an appendage of her husband and you don't know how to refer to a woman who's not married?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
6. Promises have no value if the people do not believe them.
The people seem to believe in Barack Obama and his promise to make the world a better place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
7. I'm sick of the whining over this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
9. Lots of "dismay" out there. Kinda getting old, at least to me. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC