|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
keepCAblue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-27-09 10:49 PM Original message |
Attorney: OKC bombing tapes appear edited |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-27-09 10:57 PM Response to Original message |
1. What could possibly be edited from what happened? Better or worse? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 06:12 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Trentadue had a million dollar emotional damage lawsuit against the Feds |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 06:18 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. and this is relevant to the tapes how? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 07:06 AM Response to Reply #3 |
9. When someone says "tapes appear edited," it is natural to wonder |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 07:14 AM Response to Reply #9 |
11. so, the point is, you prefer to start by |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 07:28 AM Response to Reply #11 |
12. I'm all ears if you have another take. I never heard of him before now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 07:33 AM Response to Reply #12 |
13. i don't know anything about him or the tapes. i just mistrust your method |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 08:33 AM Response to Reply #13 |
17. ... The Regency Tower tape turns to static at the moment of the explosion ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 08:48 AM Response to Reply #13 |
18. Well, here are some links that link to video. Knock yourself out! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 08:54 AM Response to Reply #13 |
20. ... A review of the tapes by The Oklahoman shows some cameras, like the one at the library, clearly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Proud Liberal Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 06:52 AM Response to Reply #2 |
8. Don't forget about Iraq |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 07:10 AM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Oh, I remember all that rightrwing noise very well: the wingnuts were all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ezlivin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 08:22 AM Response to Reply #2 |
16. Rational people would like to know: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 09:04 AM Response to Reply #16 |
21. It's your theory that Federal investigators should NOT have collected th'security tapes as evidence? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ezlivin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 09:59 AM Response to Reply #21 |
23. What evidence? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 10:43 AM Response to Reply #23 |
26. You're just playing games. First you criticize Federal investigators |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ezlivin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 11:17 AM Response to Reply #26 |
27. Raising a question about an investigation is "playing"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 09:06 AM Response to Reply #16 |
22. The Republicans used the bombing as a pretext to ram through a limitation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ezlivin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 10:10 AM Response to Reply #22 |
24. Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 10:37 AM Response to Reply #24 |
25. Yes, I remember it. I read in in the Congressional Record back in 1996. And the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 03:43 PM Response to Reply #16 |
28. Rational People Recognize Answers When They Get Them.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ezlivin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 06:56 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. Link please? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-29-09 01:01 AM Response to Reply #29 |
30. Read please |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ezlivin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-29-09 01:06 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. Interesting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-29-09 05:17 PM Response to Reply #31 |
34. Any suspicious object was treated as a potential secondary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ezlivin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-30-09 08:44 AM Response to Reply #34 |
35. Did you actually read the bold text? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-30-09 10:45 AM Response to Reply #35 |
37. You know... for someone who requests links... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ezlivin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-30-09 01:45 PM Response to Reply #37 |
38. You know, for someone who reads you read a lot between the lines |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ezlivin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-30-09 02:43 PM Response to Reply #37 |
39. News reports from the day |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 06:19 AM Response to Original message |
4. Is "attorney" supposed to make him credible? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Selatius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 06:22 AM Response to Original message |
5. If the tapes weren't tampered with, it could've given us a look at any possible accomplices he had. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CBGLuthier (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 06:43 AM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Ever heard of Terry Nichols? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Selatius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 08:04 AM Response to Reply #7 |
14. Yeah, obviously. But I was speculating at the notion there could've been others. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gratuitous (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-29-09 01:10 PM Response to Reply #5 |
32. Has Glenn Beck ever accounted for his whereabouts that day? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Festivito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 06:30 AM Response to Original message |
6. LBN link: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 08:14 AM Response to Original message |
15. John Doe No. 2 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-28-09 08:51 AM Response to Original message |
19. Deleted sub-thread |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-29-09 01:13 PM Response to Original message |
33. Funny how these cameras work and don't work . . . ahem . .. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-30-09 08:52 AM Response to Original message |
36. maybe the blast temporarily screwed with the electronic systems of the cameras |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Apr 29th 2024, 09:38 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC