1. I'm wondering whether one of the U.S. attorneys who kept his or her job will come clean.
Surely there is one U.S. attorney with a conscience or a iota of patriotism - or at least the sense to think he wouldn't want a Democrat doing what the Bush administration did with regard to firing attorneys.
3. How can the Bushistas keep her from testifying....
when she's no longer connected to them though? I'm SURE they'll find a way, legal or not, but it would seem to me that her being outside the protective arm of the Bushistas would make her fair game for a subpoena. :shrug:
4. They can make a failed argument & then push it through the courts for years...
I suspect they will argue that if a 'former' White House official is required to testify before Congress about matters that were discussed while she/he was still employed as a White House official would have a 'chilling effect' on the rendering of candid advice to the President because of fear that they would be called to testify publicly once they left office.
I do not believe this argument is validly supported by 'executive privilege.' However, it will work well in a delaying campaign to get to the end of Bush's term.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.