|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Are_grits_groceries
![]() |
Fri Sep-25-09 10:02 AM Original message |
Taser abuse: how many have to die before something is done about it? (36 in 2009) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
imdjh
![]() |
Fri Sep-25-09 10:12 AM Response to Original message |
1. Much fewer than if they had used their guns. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demeter
![]() |
Fri Sep-25-09 10:21 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. If the situation didn't call for a gun, then it didn't need a taser, either |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
imdjh
![]() |
Fri Sep-25-09 10:30 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. I'm going to disagree there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demeter
![]() |
Fri Sep-25-09 10:45 AM Response to Reply #4 |
7. If the Choice Is between Shooting Lead or a Taser, then a Taser Is the Choice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire_Medic_Dave
![]() |
Sun Sep-27-09 10:26 PM Response to Reply #2 |
54. That's exactly what tasers are for, to subdue with less lethal force. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ignis
![]() |
Fri Sep-25-09 02:31 PM Response to Reply #1 |
25. That'd be great...if the facts matched that argument. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
imdjh
![]() |
Sat Sep-26-09 12:33 AM Response to Reply #25 |
40. I don't like the methodology. (I rarely do) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MajorChode
![]() |
Sun Sep-27-09 06:45 AM Response to Reply #40 |
42. Someone on DU trying to use junk science in relation to taser deaths? No way! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulsby
![]() |
Fri Sep-25-09 04:46 PM Response to Reply #1 |
27. and in agencies (tasers are better) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
imdjh
![]() |
Fri Sep-25-09 06:02 PM Response to Reply #27 |
31. Would you agree that a lot of misconduct passes under the police culture notion... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PM Martin
![]() |
Fri Sep-25-09 07:06 PM Response to Reply #31 |
35. 95% of police stick together. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulsby
![]() |
Fri Sep-25-09 07:41 PM Response to Reply #31 |
37. this is bad policy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
imdjh
![]() |
Sat Sep-26-09 12:25 AM Response to Reply #37 |
39. I don't think it's a reasonable request. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PM Martin
![]() |
Sun Sep-27-09 01:41 PM Response to Reply #39 |
46. Police needs to be reigned in. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
imdjh
![]() |
Sun Sep-27-09 05:21 PM Response to Reply #46 |
47. What a peculiar conclusion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vadawg
![]() |
Sun Sep-27-09 06:41 PM Response to Reply #39 |
52. sorry i disagree with you, when i pull you over say on a felony stop |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asdjrocky
![]() |
Sun Sep-27-09 05:34 PM Response to Reply #27 |
49. And cops love 'em, let's face it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vadawg
![]() |
Sun Sep-27-09 06:36 PM Response to Reply #27 |
51. Wish i knew how to do the applaud icon |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asdjrocky
![]() |
Sun Sep-27-09 05:30 PM Response to Reply #1 |
48. Tasers are used for sport by the police. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Echo In Light
![]() |
Fri Sep-25-09 10:23 AM Response to Original message |
3. Police State 'toys' need to fucking GO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
billyclem
![]() |
Fri Sep-25-09 10:47 AM Response to Reply #3 |
8. TASERs don't need to GO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Echo In Light
![]() |
Fri Sep-25-09 11:04 AM Response to Reply #8 |
9. "a time saving compliance tool." Spoken like a True Believer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
billyclem
![]() |
Fri Sep-25-09 12:03 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Uh, notice the context of the phrase |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Sep-25-09 12:57 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. Deleted message |
Shell Beau
![]() |
Fri Sep-25-09 02:06 PM Response to Reply #12 |
20. I don't see why that matters. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bill McBlueState
![]() |
Fri Sep-25-09 02:15 PM Response to Reply #12 |
21. what the hell? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
billyclem
![]() |
Fri Sep-25-09 02:22 PM Response to Reply #12 |
23. Pro-authority? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Echo In Light
![]() |
Fri Sep-25-09 02:39 PM Response to Reply #23 |
26. I just figured you were a regular using a different name |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire_Medic_Dave
![]() |
Sun Sep-27-09 10:27 PM Response to Reply #9 |
55. So dense you missed the whole context. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PADemD
![]() |
Fri Sep-25-09 10:35 AM Response to Original message |
5. This needs to be looked into by Congress |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
imdjh
![]() |
Fri Sep-25-09 10:45 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Why? What would be their authority to do that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asdjrocky
![]() |
Sun Sep-27-09 05:37 PM Response to Reply #6 |
50. Congress can hold an investigation on anything it wants. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MajorChode
![]() |
Sun Sep-27-09 10:07 PM Response to Reply #50 |
53. It's already being investigated and has been investigated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rd_kent
![]() |
Fri Sep-25-09 01:12 PM Response to Reply #5 |
17. What does? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stray cat
![]() |
Fri Sep-25-09 11:04 AM Response to Original message |
10. How many would have been shot instead? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz
![]() |
Fri Sep-25-09 01:05 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. Probably very few. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jeepnstein
![]() |
Fri Sep-25-09 02:28 PM Response to Reply #10 |
24. Not many. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ignis
![]() |
Fri Sep-25-09 05:29 PM Response to Reply #10 |
30. That argument doesn't fly. See post #25. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz
![]() |
Fri Sep-25-09 01:04 PM Response to Original message |
13. Only one has to die... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anonymous171
![]() |
Fri Sep-25-09 01:06 PM Response to Original message |
15. It will never stop. Tasers are a great way to avoid touching suspects |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rd_kent
![]() |
Fri Sep-25-09 01:11 PM Response to Original message |
16. So a .0025% fatality rate is too high? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MajorChode
![]() |
Sun Sep-27-09 06:51 AM Response to Reply #16 |
43. What about people who were arrested BEFORE tasers were invented |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rd_kent
![]() |
Fri Sep-25-09 01:14 PM Response to Original message |
18. So, thats 14201 times a cop DID NOT draw his/her gun. How many might have died |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dreamnightwind
![]() |
Fri Sep-25-09 02:05 PM Response to Original message |
19. Excellent, thanks for recognizing the dead |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jeepnstein
![]() |
Fri Sep-25-09 02:18 PM Response to Original message |
22. The Taser is a great tool. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dreamnightwind
![]() |
Fri Sep-25-09 05:20 PM Response to Reply #22 |
28. So where's the accountability? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jeepnstein
![]() |
Fri Sep-25-09 09:23 PM Response to Reply #28 |
38. Good questions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annm4peace
![]() |
Fri Sep-25-09 05:21 PM Response to Original message |
29. thank you for this list |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kievan Rus
![]() |
Fri Sep-25-09 06:04 PM Response to Original message |
32. A lot of minorities up there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
imdjh
![]() |
Fri Sep-25-09 07:14 PM Response to Reply #32 |
36. False equation, there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nikki Stone1
![]() |
Fri Sep-25-09 06:06 PM Response to Original message |
33. A white guy in Simi Valley was tazed to death? And Simi Valley is ok with this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PM Martin
![]() |
Fri Sep-25-09 07:04 PM Response to Original message |
34. Contrary to popular belief |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Are_grits_groceries
![]() |
Sun Sep-27-09 05:46 AM Response to Reply #34 |
41. A "cattle prod?" Really? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PM Martin
![]() |
Sun Sep-27-09 01:39 PM Response to Reply #41 |
45. I am aware of that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck
![]() |
Sun Sep-27-09 09:09 AM Response to Original message |
44. It is criminal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire_Medic_Dave
![]() |
Sun Sep-27-09 10:29 PM Response to Reply #44 |
56. So lawful use of a taser should be prosecuted. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat May 04th 2024, 08:21 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC