|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
rmp yellow (136 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-24-09 08:02 PM Original message |
Congressional Research Service: House ACORN ban may be unconstitutional |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Melinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-24-09 08:08 PM Response to Original message |
1. And once again DU calls it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Igel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-24-09 08:26 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. It called it oddly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unblock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-24-09 09:01 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. the way i "called it" was to say that as the media protrayed it, it was unconstitutional. BUT, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-24-09 09:58 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. Remind me never to hire you as a constitutional lawyer! If Congress passed a bill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unblock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-24-09 10:37 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. well, if it were that transparent, then yes, you are correct. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-24-09 08:27 PM Response to Original message |
3. The ACORN defunding vote is the very definition of "bill of attainder" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nashville_brook (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-24-09 09:02 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. no doubt -- and it doesn't take a head full of rhetoric to call it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rasputin1952 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-24-09 09:03 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. Considering the notion came from the GOP... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marshall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-24-09 10:10 PM Response to Original message |
8. Back in the day they also debated over the Emancipation Proclamation and Bills of Attainder |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 02:13 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC