|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Better Believe It (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-16-09 10:50 PM Original message |
Senate passes bill to allow passenger guns on Amtrak: Failure to comply will end Amtrak funding! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
virginia mountainman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-16-09 10:51 PM Response to Original message |
1. Whats the problem?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC_SKP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-16-09 10:52 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. +1 n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lifelong Protester (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-16-09 10:53 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Have you ever boarded an Amtrak train in rural America? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 08:41 AM Response to Reply #4 |
91. No checked bags = no checked firearms. Problem solved. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThoughtCriminal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-16-09 10:56 PM Response to Reply #1 |
7. Read again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aikoaiko (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-16-09 11:09 PM Response to Reply #7 |
13. billion dollar screening process for checked guns? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-16-09 11:23 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. do you realize most rural/suburban stations don't have *any* personnel, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-16-09 11:30 PM Response to Reply #16 |
21. You do realized amTrak allowed checked firearms for almost 4 decades? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-16-09 11:36 PM Response to Reply #21 |
25. do you realize there was no examination of or questioning re checked baggage for the last four |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-16-09 11:43 PM Response to Reply #25 |
28. why would they have to show the conductor anything. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-16-09 11:50 PM Response to Reply #28 |
33. as i've said, there IS no baggage check, nor claim checks, nor station |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 12:00 AM Response to Reply #33 |
41. READ THE DAMN BILL. If bags aren't checked the bill DOESN'T APPLY. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 12:06 AM Response to Reply #41 |
46. so people bring on their *unchecked* guns & keep them on the seat? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 12:12 AM Response to Reply #46 |
48. No. AMTRAK prohibits carried firearms. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 12:23 AM Original message |
so the plan is, passengers are allowed to have unloaded guns in their luggage, declare it without |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 12:25 AM Response to Original message |
54. That is exactly what they do with airlines right now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 12:43 AM Response to Reply #54 |
58. no. your "i have a gun to declare" routine is what happens on airlines. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 12:49 AM Response to Reply #58 |
59. Well I guess they need to raise ticket prices $0.01 to cover it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 01:34 AM Response to Reply #59 |
65. so the agents don't have to ask the question? the customer initiates the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 07:12 AM Response to Reply #65 |
76. Where in the bill does it say AmTrak needs to ask any customer anything? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThoughtCriminal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-16-09 11:28 PM Response to Reply #13 |
19. You are overlooking quite a bit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-16-09 11:39 PM Response to Reply #19 |
26. yes, compare an airport to our brick, circa 1920 amtrak station with ZERO personnel. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aikoaiko (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 12:01 AM Response to Reply #19 |
42. Yes, but the mechanisms for security are the same whether guns are checked or not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThoughtCriminal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 12:12 AM Response to Reply #42 |
49. Not quite |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 12:19 AM Response to Reply #49 |
51. Why. It might lead to more false positives but certainly not false negatives. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThoughtCriminal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 12:40 AM Response to Reply #51 |
57. Think about it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 12:52 AM Response to Reply #57 |
60. Sorry I just don't see it as the giant problem you make it out to be. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThoughtCriminal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 01:06 AM Response to Reply #60 |
63. Since firearms and ammunition are not allowed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 01:12 AM Response to Reply #63 |
64. Sorry it is a constitutional right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 01:38 AM Response to Reply #64 |
66. FUND IT, then. $1.3 billion = in constant dollars, their approximate 1975 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 07:24 AM Response to Reply #66 |
81. Obviously the Senate considers it already funded. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThoughtCriminal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 01:52 AM Response to Reply #64 |
68. Retreating to this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 07:29 AM Response to Reply #68 |
83. Always the escalation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aikoaiko (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 08:57 AM Response to Reply #49 |
101. quite. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThoughtCriminal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 09:18 AM Response to Reply #101 |
104. Many problems with that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aikoaiko (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 09:27 AM Response to Reply #104 |
106. I have confidence that the AMTRAK personnel can handle this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThoughtCriminal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 09:34 AM Response to Reply #106 |
109. According to Amtrak's Director - they do not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benEzra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 11:09 AM Response to Reply #49 |
113. I am under the impression that most explosives dogs aren't trained to alert on small arms ammunition |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 12:18 AM Response to Reply #42 |
50. what "mechanisms for security"? there are NO personnel. NO money, not even for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 12:23 AM Response to Reply #50 |
53. Your missing the point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 12:26 AM Response to Reply #53 |
55. your routine takes extra time. you don't "declare" items on amtrak. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 12:37 AM Response to Reply #55 |
56. It takes all of 10 seconds. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 12:56 AM Response to Reply #56 |
61. i thought you were the statistical guy. 10 additional seconds for each of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 01:04 AM Response to Reply #61 |
62. 10 seconds for each passenger with firearm not all passengers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 01:42 AM Response to Reply #62 |
67. you still have to ask the question. let's time it: ok, by my watch, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 07:10 AM Response to Reply #67 |
75. Once again did you read the bill? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aikoaiko (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 09:00 AM Response to Reply #50 |
102. I think you're point that AMTRAKs security is underfunded is a good one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lifelong Protester (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-18-09 10:05 PM Response to Reply #50 |
116. No one seems to get this but you and I |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-16-09 11:29 PM Response to Reply #13 |
20. How nice that you identify the bag your gun is in. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aikoaiko (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-16-09 11:52 PM Response to Reply #20 |
35. always. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 03:28 AM Response to Reply #35 |
73. So you never go thru New York? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 08:39 AM Response to Reply #73 |
89. Despite what NY think it is part of the United States and FOPA does apply fully to New York |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 09:47 PM Response to Reply #89 |
115. Oh. I thought the handlers would just pocket the guns. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aikoaiko (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 08:51 AM Response to Reply #73 |
99. Sure, Rochester. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 12:03 AM Response to Reply #13 |
44. "conveyor belt." lol. this is a "big" station. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 08:48 AM Response to Reply #13 |
97. Have fun trying that in Penn Station |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 08:50 AM Response to Reply #97 |
98. NYPD would be sued then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aikoaiko (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 09:01 AM Response to Reply #97 |
103. Its happens all the time in JFK and Laguardia. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pipoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-16-09 11:17 PM Response to Reply #7 |
15. Well then they should have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-16-09 11:24 PM Response to Reply #7 |
17. AmTrack allowed checked firearm for decades... just like airlines have. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-16-09 11:31 PM Response to Reply #17 |
22. i've ridden the trains regularly since i was a small child, before it was amtrak. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-16-09 11:48 PM Response to Reply #22 |
31. Why would they examine it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThoughtCriminal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-16-09 11:32 PM Response to Reply #17 |
23. The reason they changed it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-16-09 11:50 PM Response to Reply #23 |
32. Which is why you are required to declare ammunition. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-16-09 11:52 PM Response to Reply #32 |
36. fund it. fund it. pay for two "gun-checkers" on every train. plus a "secured compartment". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-16-09 11:59 PM Response to Reply #36 |
40. Why there are no gun checkers on airlines? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThoughtCriminal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 12:05 AM Response to Reply #40 |
45. At the airport. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 12:08 AM Response to Reply #45 |
47. So if the dog can't detect the difference between ammo and bomb.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThoughtCriminal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 12:23 AM Response to Reply #47 |
52. Well the dogs can't, so that's a lot of cutting and checking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 01:59 AM Response to Reply #40 |
70. i'm going by what this ally of yours says: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 07:18 AM Response to Reply #70 |
78. Well he is uninformed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aikoaiko (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 09:31 AM Response to Reply #78 |
107. Perhaps different airports handle these things differently; |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 09:34 AM Response to Reply #107 |
108. I stand corrected. I would imagine that would cause a stir for those who are not use to firearms. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 01:55 AM Response to Reply #1 |
69. We don't even need that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-16-09 10:52 PM Response to Original message |
2. They should make people check them, as on an airplane. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-16-09 11:26 PM Response to Reply #2 |
18. They are. That is EXACTLY what the bill does. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-16-09 11:42 PM Response to Reply #2 |
27. as i said, most amtrak stops in the us don't check baggage. many have no personnel. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 09:21 AM Response to Reply #27 |
105. So if they don't check baggage then someone cannot carry a gun n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
havocmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-16-09 10:55 PM Response to Original message |
5. but but but.... wingers said Obama and DEM Congress were gonna grab all the guns |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rwheeler31 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-16-09 10:56 PM Response to Original message |
6. This is so stupid, what a waste of time and money. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jtuck004 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-16-09 10:56 PM Response to Original message |
8. Have you ridden AMTRAK lately? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-16-09 11:43 PM Response to Reply #8 |
29. i ride seattle-portland fairly regularly, & have never had the experience you note. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jtuck004 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 09:45 AM Response to Reply #29 |
111. Experience |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ramulux (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-16-09 10:59 PM Response to Original message |
9. This is brilliant.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-16-09 11:01 PM Response to Original message |
10. Wonderful...just f**kin wonderful... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-16-09 11:03 PM Response to Original message |
11. I once took a saxophone across country on Amtrack. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Equality4all (16 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-16-09 11:09 PM Response to Original message |
12. More change we can believe in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GodDamLiberal (135 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-16-09 11:14 PM Response to Original message |
14. Maybe they could |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TxRider (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-16-09 11:33 PM Response to Original message |
24. You can take guns on a plane in checked baggage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-16-09 11:46 PM Response to Reply #24 |
30. um - because the majority of stations don't have hundreds of personnel to screen your luggage? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-16-09 11:51 PM Response to Reply #30 |
34. So bags are unsceened with or without this bill so what is the difference? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 02:02 AM Response to Reply #34 |
71. how about if you link the bill & we'll discuss it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 07:19 AM Response to Reply #71 |
79. Text of the bill is below in #72. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosa Luxemburg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-16-09 11:53 PM Response to Original message |
37. trains can be hijacked too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jkid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-16-09 11:56 PM Response to Original message |
38. Am afraid that's what the conservatives want: Total shutdown of Amtrak |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 12:02 AM Response to Reply #38 |
43. What unfunded mandate? Did you read the bill? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-16-09 11:56 PM Response to Original message |
39. Text of the bill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 02:14 AM Response to Reply #39 |
72. 1. declaration, in whatever form, costs time. 2. declaration question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 07:16 AM Response to Reply #72 |
77. They don't need to ask every passenger. The airlines don't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 08:47 AM Response to Reply #39 |
95. What about local gun laws? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 08:54 AM Response to Reply #95 |
100. FOPA passed almost 2 decades ago. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Selatius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 03:48 AM Response to Original message |
74. They may have successfully destroyed Amtrak with this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 07:20 AM Response to Reply #74 |
80. Where in the bill is the word screening used? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Selatius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 03:14 PM Response to Reply #80 |
114. Terrorist: "I don't have any weapons with me." Amtrak: "OK. Next in line." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marmar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 07:27 AM Response to Original message |
82. I'm as anti-gun as anyone, but I'm OK with it if it's only checked baggage.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Believe It (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 08:31 AM Response to Reply #82 |
85. The not so "hidden" purpose behind the bill is to starve and end Amtrak train service |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
votingupstart (535 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 07:34 AM Response to Original message |
84. its in checked baggage - so what, bags are not being checked now anyway |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tim01 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 08:35 AM Response to Original message |
86. Does everybody go through metal detectors to get on a train now? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 08:36 AM Response to Original message |
87. it's checked baggage, like on planes. yet another in a long line of failthreads BBI. go back to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 08:36 AM Response to Original message |
88. I think we are becoming like the "Wild West" with all this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 08:41 AM Response to Reply #88 |
90. Yup. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 08:43 AM Response to Original message |
92. Why was this bill even introduced? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 08:45 AM Response to Reply #92 |
94. Why did AmTrak ban checked lawfully transported firearms? That seems from right field. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 08:44 AM Response to Original message |
93. So people will be walking around Penn Station with guns in their bags? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 08:47 AM Response to Reply #93 |
96. Depending on the conditions.... Yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TankLV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 09:42 AM Response to Original message |
110. Then why not allow them on PLANES?!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-17-09 09:56 AM Response to Reply #110 |
112. I don't want to alarm you but.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 01:30 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC