Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Insurance Companies Consider Domestic Violence A Pre-Existing Condition

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 11:01 AM
Original message
Insurance Companies Consider Domestic Violence A Pre-Existing Condition


http://www.feministpeacenetwork.org/2009/09/12/insurance-companies-consider-domestic-violence-a-pre-existing-condition/


In the very low blow department–As I’ve pointed out before, the current system of health insurance in this country is hugely discriminatory against women, but what I somehow missed until today is that health insurance can be denied to victims of domestic violence in nine states and the District of Columbia because domestic violence is considered a pre-existing condition! No this isn’t a Granny Death Panel type rumor, it comes straight from a website run by the oh-so-radical Department of Health and Human Services.

As the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) blog puts it, “Words cannot describe the sheer inhumanity of this claim.”

If you are as angry about this as I am, please immediately let your elected officials know via the SEIU site.
---------------------


please pass this info far and wide
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. a kick before I go
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Schema Thing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. wtf?
just wtff?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. Fuckers!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Today Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. Unfortunately, the link to the footnote does not have a link to the study
Edited on Sun Sep-13-09 12:30 PM by Better Today
or a list of the states where it is allowed. And when I go to the NWLC.org site to view the pdf of the report my entire computer freezes and locks up. Can anyone find a link that works?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imdjh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Here's more....
http://www.healthreform.gov/reports/denied_coverage/index.html

I'm willing to believe it so I didn't go looking for an unbiased or official site.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Today Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Yes, I had already found that, when you follow the footnote link,...
for that remark (footnote 8) it goes to a page where most of the other footnotes are hyperlinked but this one isn't. So I typed in the not hyperlinked site. I then find there's a pdf to view for detail info, but clicking on that link freezes up my puter.

I'm really curious which states allow this, I'm not doubting the material.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
6. Great.
Just peachy.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imdjh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
8. Sure, why not?
According to the article they can do this in nine states? Why shouldn't they? If they can exclude a person for a pre-existing condition, or anything which makes him riskier than another applicant, then being a former victim of domestic violence is as valid as any other lifestyle marker. Some people choose to drink too much. Others smoke. Some people choose spouses who are violent, demonstrating poor lifestyle decision making on the part of the applicant, possible propensity to other lifestyle issues like drinking, smoking, overeating, drug use, etc...

Nothing special about this. This is why we need single payer or "government option".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
9. Yes, they better hope the public option passes
...'cause they will have their own "preexisting condition" if it doesn't pass. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
10. Dupe (K & R though...'cause it's important) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undergroundpanther Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
11. corporate psychopath
corporations are psychopathic are you really suprised when a organization designed to make a few individuals very rich off the money and needs of others ,and nothing else.. has no heart?

The corporation itself, it has the heart of an abuser.They financially abuse all of us.
one fundamental point -- the corporation is a psychopath.

Psychologist Dr. Robert Hare runs down a checklist of psychopathic traits and there is a close match.

The corporation is irresponsible because in an attempt to satisfy the corporate goal, everybody else is put at risk.
Corporations try to manipulate everything, including public opinion.
Corporations are grandiose, always insisting that "we're number one, we're the best."
Corporations refuse to accept responsibility for their own actions and are unable to feel remorse.

And the key to reversing the control of this psychopathic institution is to understand the nature of the beast.
http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0218-01.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
12. Using that logic, drinking water, eating food, and breathing air
can be construed as an increased risk factor as every living human that ever did one of those things eventually dies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
14. OMG, those evil SOBs!!!
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC