Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

In White House Plan, War 'Czar' Would Cut Through Bureaucracy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 11:51 PM
Original message
In White House Plan, War 'Czar' Would Cut Through Bureaucracy
Edited on Fri Apr-13-07 12:19 AM by bemildred
Some major league butt-covering being planned here. You got this? A new layer of bureaucracy is going to cut through all the bureaucracy. Notice that Newt has his snout shoved deep into this too.

Edit: Notice the sorry way the blame for the war is being shifted to our government employees here too. It is not Bush and his pig-ignorant minions that screwed it up, nooooo. It's nameless inefficient government "bureaucrats".


When the commanding general in Iraq needed people for a rule-of-law initiative, he had to send a memo to the U.S. Central Command. That command forwarded it to the Joint Chiefs of Staff. The Joint Chiefs forwarded it to the Office of the Secretary of Defense. Only then was it passed along to the White House to find the people.

That would change under a plan developed by President Bush's aides to create a high-powered "czar" to oversee the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. The new "execution manager," as the White House termed the position, would be empowered to cut through the bureaucracy and talk directly with Army Gen. David H. Petraeus, the top U.S. military commander in Iraq, and other key figures to figure out what is needed to make progress on the ground.

A copy of the White House proposal, obtained by The Washington Post, details a strikingly different role for the West Wing in the day-to-day management of the two wars, and represents an attempt to assert a more coherent and efficient leadership that many officials in different parts of the government have complained is lacking. The idea for such a czar has been promoted by various people, including former House speaker Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.), who sent a memo to the White House several weeks ago advocating it as part of an 18-point plan.

"The slowness and ineffectiveness of the American bureaucracy is a major hindrance to our winning, and they've got to cut through it," Gingrich said in an interview yesterday.

WaPo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
badgerpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Micromanaging again, I see...
Jeez.
Whyn't they just say they need a whipping boy target? Somebody to hold the bag and catch all the blame for this mess?

Remember, NOTHING is ever, ever Bush's fault.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. "the American bureaucracy is a major hindrance to our winning"
At least these republickers are finally admitting they simply HATE America, maybe this will wake up the idiot sheeple that vote for these fucksticks?

It's not the fact that the reshrublicks spend 110% of their energy making SURE the American buraucracy is a failure, no, can't be that.

Have I told everyone lately how much these assholes piss me off?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kool Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
3. Gingrich sent a memo to the WH suggesting this
as part of an 18-point plan? Well, this part is unspectacular. What are the other 17 parts, Newt? Are they all this good? I love the part about "cutting through the bureaucracy", meaning no oversight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
4. How truly pathetic....I guess FDR is spinning in his grave, after all...
he led the nation through a two front war right up until a few weeks before the war ended...and he didn't need a "War Czar".

For that matter, every president before this one didn't need no steenking "war czar".

Just shows more incompetence at the executive level...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
5. These people get crazier and crazier. Why are they so
unstoppable?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 12:31 AM
Response to Original message
6. read: even less respect for process & oversight...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
7. A Czar just creates anonther level of bureaucracy....
Edited on Fri Apr-13-07 12:36 AM by ingac70
Like putting FEMA and other agencies under Homeland Security was suppose to "cut through" bureaucracy.

Repubs kill me with talking about how governmet is the problem, then precede to go out of their way and screw things up worse to show just how big a problem it can be.

Idiots! :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NormanYorkstein Donating Member (762 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
8. Drug Czar, Energy Czar, War Czar - why not just hire a Czar?
Edited on Fri Apr-13-07 12:40 AM by NormanYorkstein
Just turn us into a dictatorship and be done with it!

The Czar will cut through the stagnant bureaucracy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Yeah, we need a Czar Czar to handle ALL the failed wars.
War on poverty, war on drugs, etc, no mention the real, non-bullshit wars on small nations with small armies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
10. Dear Mr. Bush, I suggest you outsource the position of 'War Czar' to either
India, Pakistan, or Viet Nam. Or, perhaps you could hire an H-1B visa holder from Russia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
11. Yes, once they get that pesky Congress out of the way they will win the war...bullshit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
12. instead of "War Czar", why not call the position "Commander-in-chief"
and yes, we are in DIRE need of one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 05:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC