Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

'I would tend not to' support the public option, says Landrieu

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-30-09 06:28 PM
Original message
'I would tend not to' support the public option, says Landrieu
Source: CNN

WASHINGTON (CNN) – A moderate Senate Democrat who is a possible swing vote in Republicans’ favor on health care reform said Sunday she is not likely to support a robust public health insurance option and believes that reform proposals should focus on lowering health care costs.

“I would tend not to,” Sen. Mary Landrieu of Louisiana said Sunday on CNN’s State of the Union when asked whether she would support a public health insurance option included in health care reform bills passed by committees in the House of Representatives. “But, we’ve got to keep working to find solutions,” Landrieu added.

“There are some portions of our health care system that are working, but it’s all too expensive.”

The Democrat told CNN Chief National Correspondent John King she thinks costs could be contained without the inclusion of a public health insurance option. She said she supports an alternative proposal co-sponsored by Sens. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., and Bob Bennett, R-Utah, that focuses on “providing insurance through the free marketplace with the right regulations and safeguards.”

Read more: http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/08/30/i-would-tend-not-to-support-the-public-option-says-landrieu/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-30-09 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Vote against cloture, or just vote against the bill?
I don't see too many Democratic Senators (Lieberman is another story) voting against cloture....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Becky72 Donating Member (457 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-30-09 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Good question
There is a difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #1
26. Since there are exactly 60 Democrats in the Senate, it would only take one to sustain a filibuster
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #26
30. We would need all the Democrats, plus the two Independents plus one repuke to kill
a filibuster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
3waygeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-30-09 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. "We would tend not to" support Landrieu in 2014, say LA Dems n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-30-09 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. 'I would tend to' be a DINO whore, says Landrieu
Edited on Sun Aug-30-09 06:34 PM by Skittles
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-30-09 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. Umm - the public option will cut costs
and, it will over the long-term. Maybe not as much in the short-term, but the longer-term will see lower costs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-30-09 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. There is only 1 way to get rid of DINOs and Blue Dogs and that is to get rid of them.
Unless, of course, we enjoy having Philistines in the camp who we trust but will stab us in the backs when it suits them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 06:08 AM
Response to Reply #6
24. If you 'get rid of them,' who is likely to replace them?
Keep in mind that most of them come from states and districts where Republicans outnumber Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #24
31. Why are you so against the public option? Isnt that the republican stand? Why do you support the
republican stand on this issue?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. When did I say that I was againt the public option?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #32
45. We never get answers from you Freddie, only questions. You are a corporatist and cant hide it.
You may claim to support a public option, but I am betting you wont support a public option similar to Medicare not run by a corporation. Blue Dogs are corporatists and support the republican agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #45
49. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DireStrike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #24
43. Depends if the DNC keeps trying to crush progressive candidates
before they even get a chance to run against hand-picked blue dog darlings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #43
50. How many 'progressive candidates' did the DNC 'crush' when Dean was Chairman of the DNC?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #24
46. Another question? republicans are low but at least they dont pretend to be Democrats.
Nothin lower than a Blue Dog DINO. We dont need them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #46
51. How do you get a majority in the House without Blue Dogs?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #51
59. Do you support single payer health care reform? Or at least a strong public option
that includes a government run option like Medicare?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #59
60. Like President Obama, I oppose single-payer
I support a public option, but I would be fine it if it was not government run.

Now, do you dare to answer my question: How do you get a majority in the House without the Blue Dogs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #60
61. I dont want a majority if it requires me to accept you fucking blue dog republicans. Go to hell
straight to hell, do not pass go, do not collect your fucking greedy money from the health insurance lobby.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #61
63. Did you like the legislation which the Republicans passed when they were in the majority?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #63
64. I dont like republicans and i hate blue dogs. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #64
66. Without the Blue Dogs, the GOP will be back in the majority
Is that what you want?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #66
68. I will not yield to the black mail of the blue dogs. I'd rather fight repubs than put up with blue
dog bastards. The line is drawn. Either you are for the middle class or against. Blue Dogs are against and can go to hell with their republican friends.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #68
74. No one is blackmailing anyone
There is simply yet another a policy dispute going on in Congress. We don't have a rubber-stamp legislature as they do in places like Cuba.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #74
77. This "policy dispute" is costing human lives. You put profit above human lives. Despicable. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-02-09 07:16 AM
Response to Reply #77
89. All the better to come to a quick compromise rather than political absolutism
Or is sticking it to health care insurance company executives more important than saving lives?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #74
83. Fuck you Freddie, and your stupid Blue Dog ideaology.
This is WHY wer'e in this friggin mess - thanks to your stupid ultraconservative bullshit.

I'm still waiting for my delivery..

Hawkeye-X

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #83
86. Hey, I was going to say that. The blue dog bastards are republicans. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-02-09 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #86
94. If the Blue Dogs are Republicans, why do they vote with the Democrats the majority of the time?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-02-09 07:14 AM
Response to Reply #83
88. Perhaps your time would be better spent at anger management classes instead of
politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #60
78. Nice self outage
See ya later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-02-09 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #78
96. No outrage from me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rick554 Donating Member (7 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-30-09 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
7. Uh oh
But of course, "tending not to" really doesnt mean a thing. Mary will vote for anything she's told. Not to worry!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-30-09 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Told by who?
Have you followed her record? She usually votes with Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rick554 Donating Member (7 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-30-09 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. oh she'll vote the right way
She knows who butters her bread. Big Phrmaand the UAW wont let her forget!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-30-09 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. welcome to du
:/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-30-09 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
8. If the public option will be too cheap to compete against
Then clearly it is the best method of lowering costs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eagertolearn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-30-09 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
12. How is Wydens bill going to bring down costs for insurance?
He wants to require that eveyone buy health insurance but how can you get the insurance companies to bring down the prices. They may agree to something but as soon as the democrats are out of office bale on all agreements. We have to do something long term that will work and it only makes sense to put everyone in the same pool...single payer like the rest of the world. Every person working in Washington has to be willing to lose their job to pass the best bill for all!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlbertCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-30-09 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. How is Wydens bill going to bring down costs for insurance?
It's great! Everyone will have to get health care! But why not slim it down, cut out the middle man? If EVERYONE has to pay for coverage, why not just make it a tax and then the Government could see that everyone got covered and...
....oh...
...wait a minute....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomm2thumbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-30-09 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
13. I would tend not to do anything that would jeopardize my gravy train of corporate money

I would suggest she should not tend to be re-elected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-30-09 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
14. What a surprise. Typhoid Mary opposes public health care.
Who knew?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sellitman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-30-09 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
15. Will this bitch give up her Public Health Insurance and show us her conviction?
I have no use for Blue Dogs assholes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSPS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-30-09 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. It wouldn't matter if she did "give up" her "public health insurance."
These people are all millionaires so they can easily afford even the most expensive "gold-plated" policy. (Of course, the insurance companies would probably comp them their coverage anyway as a perk for being on their payroll.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-30-09 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
16. cut off all party campaign support, replace her in the next election
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-30-09 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
19. Notice how they always talk about 'if there are votes'.
Edited on Sun Aug-30-09 08:16 PM by RandomThoughts
And when people say they do not support the Public option they do not explain why. They do not make the arguement why they think it is bad, they just say they don't support it. Like we are suppose to accept that what they think is for the best of America when they do not make the arguement for why they don't support it.


Why some do not support programs that actually help people? they don't want to help people?

Some think only the best people should have care that leads to living and reproducing. And best is defined by how much you make according to 'The Family' doctrine. So if you can't get a job that gives good health care you are suppose to die in their view. If you do not conform to 'its only business' view of profit is best, even if it hurts people, you are not worthy in the view of some. After all profit is only making the decision of who should live and die, and many believe how productive or how much money someone has should make that decision. A minimum wage mother that shows great love somehow does not have as much worth in the money first world, so they should be thinned from the herd so more productive cattle can live. That is the view of money first people, we are resources to be managed, and productivity and conformity is the required factor for any good slave. It is also an attempt so that fewer people of compassion live, while more people enslaved by money continue to live.

What is the argument supporting an industry that shows it will refuse care for people to make millions in profit for a few people. How do people think they have any authority to make policy?

What is the argument against the public option. I hear many people say what they want people to believe it doesn't have votes, it is to hard to pass, or that it is bad, but they do not say why they are against it. Explain your position. Why are you for profit over health care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-30-09 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
20. d i n o
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-30-09 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. OP supports Landrieu and repubs IMO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #22
25. Incorrect. I do not support any Republicans
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. What do you support freddie? Do you support the public option? Do you support the
Blue Dogs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #28
33. I support the public option and I support the Blue Dogs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #33
39. You support a public option with a govenment run option? or some mickey mouse private run
option?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #39
53. I support a public option that can garner enough votes to pass Congress
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #33
62. You are a liar and a blue dog. You dont support a true public option, only one which
the health insurance companies can make more billions. you are lower than a republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #62
69. Who appointed you to decide what exaclty is a "true public option?"
Edited on Tue Sep-01-09 04:28 PM by Freddie Stubbs
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #69
81. There are two sides, the corporate side and the people's side. You apparently side with the corporat
ions. A public option to buy insurance from the companies that are killing us today, isnt a real option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-02-09 07:22 AM
Response to Reply #81
91. Sounds a lot like ""You're either with us or against us"
Grown ups are intelligent enough to discern that there is often more than two sides to most arguments.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #69
82. Why do you side with the republicans and not with the people? Why? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-02-09 07:23 AM
Response to Reply #82
92. Why must you lie and insist that I am siding the Republicans?
I suppose that when you have a very weak position, the arguement "you are siding with the Republicans" is the best that you have, regardless of the facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
t0dd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #22
27. If it quacks like a duck..
Edited on Mon Aug-31-09 10:51 AM by t0dd
Oh, he just supports republicans that call themselves democrats. Big difference!
I don't understand the need to be cagey about it. Grow some blue dog balls and call yourself a republican. Or I guess there's a certain rush in getting to hold conservative views while also supporting deceptive obstructionists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #27
34. Who are these mythical Republican pretending to be Democrats that I supposedly support?
Can you name one Democrat who I support that votes with the Republicans more often than with the Democrats?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #34
38. Landrieu, for one
When was the last time she voted correctly on anything that matters?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #38
54. This year alone, she has voted with Democrats 89.9% of the time:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #34
41. In today's situation, no votes with republicans are acceptable. On important issues blue dogs
support the republicans. That is not acceptable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #41
55. In the House, only 2 of the 255 Democrats have not crossed party lines this year
Nancy Pelosi and Hilda Solis:

http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/111/house/party-voters/

And Solis was only there for a short time before she was appointed Secretary of Labor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #34
42. We are at war for our literal lives Freddie. Pick a side. republican/blue dog or
Democrat. You pick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #42
56. Sounds a lot like ""You're either with us or against us"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-30-09 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
21. And she has received how much $$$$ for her "opinion"?
There should be huge billboards put up in her state, advertising this fact, and how much she has received from the insurance industry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smalll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-30-09 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
23. So sad the way Senator Hottie breaks our heart like this, time and time again --
but isn't that the way of the world, vis-a-vis hotties and our hearts? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
29. So you support Sen Landrieu's attempt to kill health care reform? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #29
36. I have not seen any evidence that she wants to kill health care reform
She may have a different idea as to what exactly health care reform entails as to opposed to what you want, and that view is likely affected by the fact that she represents a state that overwhelmingly supported McCain over Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. You avoided the question again. Let me try again. Do you support her efforts to kill the public
option? Meaning a public option with a government run system as the option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #37
57. I reject the premise that a public option must be government run
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #57
65. As do your fellow republicans. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #65
67. As do many Democrats in Congress. If they all agreed, the law would have been passed in July
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #67
70. Democrats support a robust public option are you with us or the repukes, Freddie?
not that i have to ask.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #70
71. How do you measure 'robust?'
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #71
76. You do not support a public option with out private insurance involvement.
You are on the side of CorpAmerica. You are the enemy. We are at war for our lives. Thousands die every year because CorpAmerica demands profits. If you deny all Americans decent health care you have no morals. You put profits above human lives. You will have to account to your god.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-02-09 07:19 AM
Response to Reply #76
90. You seem to have a difficult time making a convincing argument without demolishing the truth.
I have never said that I do not support a public option without private insurance involvement. What I did say is that i support a public option, and that if private insurance involvement is what it takes to pass a public option, so be it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #36
48. You trumpet every Democrat who is remotely against the public option
or for that matter every Democrat who sides with repubs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #48
58. I don't even know how to play the trumpet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #58
84. The republican site is down the street---------->
Edited on Tue Sep-01-09 07:00 PM by Kingofalldems
In fact there are many gop sites where you could find people who agree with you. Instead you come here. Why is that? :shrug: :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-02-09 07:29 AM
Response to Reply #84
93. I come here because I am a Democrat
How about you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dugaresa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
35. they can't guarantee the lowering of costs, so she should support the public option
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
40. DLC members are not "moderate"
"The Democratic Leadership Council's agenda is indistinguishable from the Republican Neoconservative agenda," - Dennis Kucinich
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-02-09 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #40
95. Kucinich's myopic views have translated into him having little influence in Congress
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
44. Louisiana has the highest healthcare costs in the nation.
At least according to my Congressman Jay Inslee. Anyone know if this is true?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jus_the_facts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-02-09 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #44
99. Louisiana has had CHARITY hospitals for decades....
Edited on Wed Sep-02-09 02:46 PM by jus_the_facts
....unlike the majority of other states...maybe that's why the costs here are considered higher than others. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jus_the_facts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-02-09 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #44
101. BTW...I recently went through our charity system...jumped through the hoops....
...to provide all the information they asked for RE: NO INCOME....they have now turned me over to a collection agency for 172.00!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
47. Attention Louisianans:
Write a letter, send a fax, or call her office. Don't just sit on the internet and complain.

Don't let a tiny band of shouting townhall idiots speak for you. My letter is being mailed tomorrow.

And that goes for all of y'all in other states as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MountainLaurel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #47
85. Have done and will continue to do
And am going to a vigil tomorrow night in front of her offices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jus_the_facts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-02-09 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #47
100. Oh like that's gonna help...NOT...
....she doesn't give a flyin' FUCK through a flamin' hoola hoop about THE PEOPLE...only her own elitist self...and I KNOW PERSONALLY THIS IS THE TRUTH....you've been a Landrieu asskisser here for years. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
52. Welp, I de Clare.
:eyes: :wow: not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
72. Is she a "moderate" or a fuckin' dino?
Who pays her bills..big pharm assholes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-02-09 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #72
98. She is a moderate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-02-09 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #98
103. Bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-03-09 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #103
105. Voting with the Democrats in the Senate over 89% isn't a moderate?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
73. I would tend not to vote for her
In the primary if I lived in her state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-02-09 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #73
102. She probably couldn't win a Democratic primary in DE
But then, Biden probably couldn't win a Democratic primary in LA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PM Martin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
75. I would tend not to support Landrieu, says PM Martin
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-02-09 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #75
97. She is likely more concerned about support for Louisianians rather than Canadians
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
79. i'd tend not to support landrieu
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
80. And I would tend to support your opponent, who'er he or she be.
ES&D blew dog scum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
voc Donating Member (279 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
87. Makes sense...
She "tended" not to support the people who were hurt by Katrina.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-02-09 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
104. She votes republican more often than not
This is not a surprise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-03-09 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #104
106. That is a lie. She voted with Senate Democrats more tha 89% of the time this year:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC