Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Bushie Obama Can't Fire

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-28-09 11:27 AM
Original message
The Bushie Obama Can't Fire

http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2009-08-25/the-bushie-obama-cant-fire/?cid=bsa:mostpopular3


Obama vowed to reverse Bush's hard-line drug policies, but Dubya still has a man raising havoc in the White House drug office. Problem is, Obama can't fire him.


-snip-

“He was brought in as a political hatchet man,” says Ross Deck, a former ONDCP analyst and a 16-year-veteran of the office who quit during the Walters years. Before joining in the ONDCP, Murray had no prior experience in addiction science, or law enforcement, or anything else particularly related to drug policy.

He is on the record questioning many of the drug policies espoused by Kerlikowske. Congress has spent three years trying to get him fired.

Why, then, does Murray somehow still have a job in the Obama administration? The reason can be found in the fine print of the federal bureaucracy. Midway through his tenure, Walters moved Murray—at the time his special assistant—from a politically appointed job to the chief scientist’s post, a theoretically apolitical position that makes him much harder to fire. By law, Kerlikowske can’t touch a hair on his head for the first 120 days of his own stint as drug czar. Which means that until the middle of September, Murray is living in a peculiar limbo: a lone human memento of the Bush administration’s botched prosecution of the drug war, surrounded by people who are trying to undo the work on which he has spent the past eight years.

-long snip detailing his craziness and ineptitude-

The committee has made it clear that ONDCP’s science shop won’t see another dime until Murray is gone, at least from his current job. What happens after that is an open question. (Repeated calls to the ONDCP’s press office for an interview with Murray or a comment on his future prospects went unreturned.) While most drug-policy watchers assume Kerlikowske will kick him out of the chief scientist post as soon as he can, actually firing him is trickier. There are ways to encourage burrowed-in ideologues to quit, however—ONDCP veterans recall that George Bush Sr.’s drug czar, Bob Martinez, used to do it by assigning them to an office with no windows, phones, or computers.

“He’ll be there until somebody runs him off,” Ross Deck, the former ONDCP analyst, says of Murray. “What can they do with him? They can give him a job counting paperclips.”
-----------------------------

they better find a way to get rid of him

or we will come do it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-28-09 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. If they really wanted to get rid of him
they'd promote him into a bigger office with a bigger desk and make sure that desk never has a single scrap of paper on it for the rest of his career.

That's how bad civil service bosses are neutralized. Either they collect a paycheck for doing nothing or they quit in frustration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
haele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-28-09 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Most likely he'd quit -
Public service payscale is still lower than what jerks at his level could get on the outside, either through corporations or think tanks.
Phase out his current position and require new criteria he isn't as qualified for as other candidates will be. Let him know he isn't going anywhere really soon as his program requirements are changing, ease away any responsibilities - any chance of showing a value-added benefit that would enable him to merit pay raises or bonuses, make it difficult for him to attempt a lateral transfer to another payscale, and he'll leave before a year is out for a "plumb" Conservative beltway or think tank job that "pays" twice what he makes in civil service for whatever time they'll keep him employed.

I work with govies, it happens all the time with those who have Peter-Principled themselves into a management position that they really shouldn't be in. Depending on the focus of the Department, if it's a political focus or if it's a functional focus, the flotsam that rises to the top usually leaves as soon as there's no where else to go.

Haele
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-28-09 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I, too, had a civil service job
which is why I described the plum department job with the resolutely empty desk.

I've seen it happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-28-09 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. I've never been a fan of civil service laws period
Unelected bureaucrats should reflect the will of the democratically elected politicians we elect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-28-09 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Politicians thought so too
That's the system that kept the big city bosses in power for generations, and made the office of Postmaster General such a plum. Just imagine the result if Carl Rove and Tom Delay had had the ability to replace the entire federal beaurocracy wth a few million of their best friends.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-28-09 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. civil service laws aren't perfect, but they're far better than the alternative
politicians are corrupt enough without giving them the ability to dole out oodles of jobs as payoffs, nevermind the effect of having partisans at every level.

how trustworthy would the numbers from the omb become, or the work of the epa or the fda?
how would you like partisan republicans in charge of delivering welfare checks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-28-09 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
3. That was the doctrine all along
make government not work, then dismantle it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-28-09 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. true
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-28-09 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
9. The "War on Drugs" was FAILED Policy...
... long before Bush sat in the Oval Office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC