Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FCC Diversity Chief Asked Liberals to Copy FDR, Take on Limbaugh, Murdoch, Supreme Court

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 07:06 PM
Original message
FCC Diversity Chief Asked Liberals to Copy FDR, Take on Limbaugh, Murdoch, Supreme Court

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/53136

Thursday, August 27, 2009
By Matt Cover

(CNSNews.com) – Federal Communications Commission Chief Diversity Officer Mark Lloyd called on fellow liberals to follow the model of former President Franklin Delano Roosevelt and challenge conservative media moguls and station owners, particularly figures such as Rush Limbaugh, Rupert Murdoch, and “a pro-big business Supreme Court aligned” with them.

Lloyd made the call in a 2007 article for the liberal Center for American Progress while he was a senior fellow there.



Entitled “Media Maneuvers: Why the Rush to Waive Cross-Ownership Bans,” the article ostensibly talks about the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) decision to allow Chicago real estate mogul Sam Zell to purchase the then-failing Chicago Tribune Co., owner of the Chicago Tribune newspaper.

Lloyd, however, uses the Zell case, in which Zell ultimately prevailed, to make a broader argument that liberals should look to the tactics employed by FDR to combat his conservative critics in the media, saying that liberals must challenge outspoken conservatives who own media outlets.

“Progressives should take a page from FDR’s media diversity playbook,” Lloyd wrote. “t the end of a second FDR administration when the New Dealers were still battling a conservative print media and a conservative Supreme Court to fix the great debacle of American capitalism – the Great Depression.


Former President Franklin Delano Roosevelt


“FDR’s fireside chats and his ready access to radio allowed him to speak directly to Americans and continue to push a progressive agenda,” said Lloyd. “But FDR was becoming increasingly concerned about the purchase of radio operations by the newspaper publishers.”

FULL story at link.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
orpupilofnature57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. Most people don't even know what 'The Great Business plot' was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Well let's inform them:
1934: The Plot Against America

BY Scott Horton
PUBLISHED July 28, 2007
I’m back from the land of heather and thistles, not to mention wee drams and lukewarm ale, but on my way out a friend at the BBC alerted me to this, a not-to-miss program on the BBC this morning, accessible over the next several days by internet. It’s the story of the Plot Against America. I don’t mean the Philip Roth novel, nor even the Sinclair Lewis book, It Can’t Happen Here, but rather the historical events upon which these two works of fiction were based.

In November 1934, federal investigators uncovered an amazing plot involving some two dozen senior businessmen, a good many of them Wall Street financiers, to topple the government of the United States and install a fascist dictatorship. Roth’s novel is developed from several strands of this factual account; he assumed the plot is actually carried out, whereas in fact an alert FDR shut it down but stopped short of retaliatory measures against the plotters. A key element of the plot involved a retired prominent general who was to have raised a private army of 500,000 men from unemployed veterans and who blew the whistle when he learned more of what the plot entailed. The plot was heavily funded and well developed and had strong links with fascist forces abroad. A story in the New York Times and several other newspapers reported on it, and a special Congressional committee was created to conduct an investigation. The records of this committee were scrubbed and sealed away in the National Archives, where they have only recently been made available.

The Congressional committee kept the names of many of the participants under wraps and no criminal action was ever brought against them. But a few names have leaked out. And one is Prescott Bush, the grandfather of the incumbent president. Prescott Bush was of course deep into the business of the Hamburg-America Lines, and had tight relations throughout this period with the new Government that had come to power in Germany a year earlier under Chancellor Aldoph Hitler. It appears that Bush was to have formed a key liaison for the group with the new German government.

Prescott Bush, of course, went on to service as a U.S. Senator from Connecticut, and his son, George H.W. Bush emerged from World War II as a hero.

-snip

http://www.harpers.org/archive/2007/07/hbc-90000651



The Whitehouse Coup
Monday 23 July 2007



The coup was aimed at toppling President Franklin D Roosevelt with the help of half-a-million war veterans. The plotters, who were alleged to involve some of the most famous families in America, (owners of Heinz, Birds Eye, Goodtea, Maxwell Hse & George Bush’s Grandfather, Prescott) believed that their country should adopt the policies of Hitler and Mussolini to beat the great depression.

Mike Thomson investigates why so little is known about this biggest ever peacetime threat to American democracy.




http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/history/document/document_20070723.shtml


WOULDN'T IT BE GREAT IF KO OR RACHEL WOULD EDUCATE VIEWERS WITH LITTLE KNOWN HISTORICAL FACTS LIKE THESE?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I know this, but every time I read it again my jaw drops.
And I ask myself what could be going on in recent times. Because most certainly it didn't just stop with that group. And something inside me says that by destroying an economy, starting wars, etc., it leads the country into a scenario where those half a million men would be more willing to take up arms against _______. Fill in the blank.


I'm not happy about how they weren't punished. That sounds too much like how Obama would handle it as well. I guess great people tend to act like that.

Yes, if only Rachel would take time to discuss this. I might just email her with this idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orpupilofnature57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-28-09 05:52 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. It was a clear example of "The New World Order " and the 12% that Own..
the other 88% of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-28-09 07:01 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. The term "New World Order" 1st came about by "The Family" founder Abraham Vereide
The Family was founded in April 1935 by Abraham Vereide, a Norwegian immigrant who made his living as a traveling preacher. One night, while lying in bed fretting about socialists, Wobblies, and a Swedish Communist who, he was sure, planned to bring Seattle under the control of Moscow, Vereide received a visitation: a voice, and a light in the dark, bright and blinding. The next day he met a friend, a wealthy businessman and former major, and the two men agreed upon a spiritual plan. They enlisted nineteen business executives in a weekly breakfast meeting and together they prayed, convinced that Jesus alone could redeem Seattle and crush the radical unions. They wanted to give Jesus a vessel, and so they asked God to raise up a leader. One of their number, a city councilman named Arthur Langlie, stood and said, “I am ready to let God use me.” Langlie was made first mayor and later governor, backed in both campaigns by money and muscle from his prayer-breakfast friends, whose number had rapidly multiplied.55. As Vereide recounted in a 1961 biography, Modern Viking, one union boss joined the group, proclaiming that the prayer movement would make unions obsolete. He said, “'I got down on my knees and asked God to forgive me . . . for I have been a disturbing factor and a thorn in Your flesh.'” A “rugged capitalist who had been the chairman of the employers' committee in the big strike” put his left hand on the labor leader's shoulder and said, “'Jimmy, on this basis we go on together.'” Vereide and his new brothers spread out across the Northwest in chauffeured vehicles (a $20,000 Dusenburg carried brothers on one mission, he boasted). “Men,” wrote Vereide, “thus quickened.” Prayer breakfast groups were formed in dozens of cities, from San Francisco to Philadelphia. There were already enough men ministering to the down-and-out, Vereide had decided; his mission field would be men with the means to seize the world for God. Vereide called his potential flock of the rich and powerful, those in need only of the “real” Jesus, the “up-and-out.”

Vereide arrived in Washington, D.C., on September 6, 1941, as the guest of a man referred to only as “Colonel Brindley.” “Here I am finally,” he wrote to his wife, Mattie, who remained in Seattle. “In a day or two—many will know that I am in town and by God's grace it will hum.” Within weeks he had held his first D.C. prayer meeting, attended by more than a hundred congressmen. By 1943, now living in a suite at Colonel Brindley's University Club, Vereide was an insider. “My what a full and busy day!” he wrote to Mattie on January 22.

The Vice President brought me to the Capitol and counseled with me regarding the programs and plans, and then introduced me to Senator Brewster, who in turn to Senator Burton—then planned further the program and enlisted their cooperation. Then to the Supreme Court for visits with some of them . . . then back to the Senate, House. . . . The hand of the Lord is upon me. He is leading.

By the end of the war, nearly a third of U.S. senators attended one of his weekly prayer meetings.

In 1944, Vereide had foreseen what he called “the new world order.” “Upon the termination of the war there will be many men available to carry on,” Vereide wrote in a letter to his wife. “Now the ground-work must be laid and our leadership brought to face God in humility, prayer and obedience.” He began organizing prayer meetings for delegates to the United Nations, at which he would instruct them in God's plan for rebuilding from the wreckage of the war. Donald Stone, a high-ranking administrator of the Marshall Plan, joined the directorship of Vereide's organization. In an undated letter, he wrote Vereide that he would “soon begin a tour around the world for the , combining with this a spiritual mission.” In 1946, Vereide, too, toured the world, traveling with letters of introduction from a half dozen senators and representatives, and from Paul G. Hoffman, the director of the Marshall Plan. He traveled also with a mandate from General John Hildring, assistant secretary of state, to oversee the creation of a list of good Germans of “the predictable type” (many of whom, Vereide believed, were being held for having “the faintest connection” with the Nazi regime), who could be released from prison “to be used, according to their ability in the tremendous task of reconstruction.” Vereide met with Jewish survivors and listened to their stories, but he nevertheless considered ex-Nazis well suited for the demands of “strong” government, so long as they were willing to worship Christ as they had Hitler.

-snip

http://www.harpers.org/archive/2003/03/0079525

YOU KNOW THE CULT THAT PREACHES JESUS ADVOCATED FOR FREE MARKETS, GOVERNMENT DE-REGULATION AND AGAINST UNION TO HELP WORKERS ACHIEVE FAIRNESS IN THE WORKPLACE. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-28-09 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. It's all about money. Just amazing.
I have to wonder if Bush followers would have ever followed them had the media told the truth about who they were, and where they came from.

Pro life/pro war. How does that work? The same forces that you just quoted are the same ones who are still working overtime to ensure that their masses think a certain way. To get people to think insanely about pro life, and yet to ignore the suffering caused by being pro war, is truly phenomenal. Those same forces if turned for good could turn the world into a greater place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-28-09 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. According to Jeff Sharlet's well researched book, "The Family" many of these mega churches have
moved away from any notion of the social gospel (help the less fortunate) to preach this craziness that Jesus would want free markets & de-regulation. Sharlet comments that it's easier on the middle/upper middle class not to have to bother with soup kitchens and helping the poor, instead they should advocate these twisted notions and enjoy the religious extravaganza shows that these megas put out (complete with light and glow sticks).

I had no idea these churches were preaching this sort of philosophy and never could understand why they were so overwhelmingly supporting these GOP ideas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-28-09 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. They obviously don't understand the meaning of the temptation of Christ.
I come from a line of rather religious folks. My mother is one of the only liberal thinkers in her family. My father was a minister at one point in his life. None of us can tolerate the "religious" types. It's very rare to find someone who actually studied the bible like an engineering text. Jesus wouldn't take all of the material crap on this planet. It's worthless. These assclowns just don't get it. They're heads are up their asses. Unfortunately, those with the gold tend to rule over the rest of us. It may have been a perfect world at one time, but it's fucked up now. That's why we're engaged in this battle. I see Republicans as our enemy. I'll welcome any of them in if they quit what they're doing and see the better way to live. Like Senator Byrd. I call this transcending the human condition. We can stay mired in our desires for power and wealth, or we can grow bigger.

Ah what the hell, you obviously know all of this. I have suffered immensely over this stuff. It's all so simple. Yet Rove flicks his matches on to our beautiful house, and all goes up in flames.

Those churches are worse than evil. And so many people blindly follow. I've always said that it's even the kindest people who are helping evil grow. That's what makes this such a hard thing to fight. Kind people are helping the evil grow. They just don't want to open their minds. It's fear. And ignorance.

End of rant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orpupilofnature57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-28-09 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Thank you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-28-09 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. Good reason why Napolitano mentioned wooing ex mil. for their skills.
This is why I want a show of force early, like millions of us pumping fists in their faces.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. How about simply reinstating the cross ownership rules?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jasi2006 Donating Member (544 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. makes sense to me! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheflow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. And the Fairness Doctrine. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. Gee, now why didn't WE think of that?
Edited on Thu Aug-27-09 08:16 PM by Canuckistanian
Challenging the media or major media figures is a GUARANTEE that your message WON'T be heard.

Edward R. Murrow and Walter Cronkite are dead, both literally and figuratively.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Yes, ask Howard Dean. After he said he'd break up the media monopolies,
the media suddenly started criticizing him relentlessly. He was their Golden Boy before that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Oh, yes.
I'd forgotten that.

I think someone made a post to that effect a few years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeCanWorkItOut Donating Member (182 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
9. Unfortunately, I don't see that the progressives care much more to be fair
Rush is certainly ignorant and biased enough.
But are the people at NPR and the Center for American Progress
much, much more fair-minded? I don't see that.

The reasons for our health care crisis are complex,
but the progressives certainly did their share to help
add to the problem. Both the professionals and the unions
almost entirely failed to criticize, for instance,
the monopoly powers of doctors and hospitals,
and long, long years of system-wide abuse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troubledamerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-28-09 01:01 AM
Response to Original message
11. But FDR was a socialist = fascist. Correct?
Really, I have zero hope for a nation that lets retards with rabies revise historical biographies of their presidents.

And how sloppy that liberals didn't see it coming, the revisionist vandalizing of FDR.

Use FDR as a role model? Democrats are afraid to speak his name except in hushed-tones lip service.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orpupilofnature57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-28-09 05:59 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Shrub had the audacity to call him to task ,FDR stopped the Enslavement
of mankind and had only Gen.Smedley Butler as an alli against Many American Fascists ,Prescott Bush being one of them.As long as there are guys like Ken Burns you have nothing to worry about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troubledamerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-28-09 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. Ken Burns: a "Susan Sarandon liberal"
as described by the "Media Research Center" -- a legitimate-sounding "news watchdog"...?

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tim-graham/2007/09/25/time-pbs-star-ken-burns-bashes-bush-extreme-rightward-court-tilt

I agree, Burns is badly needed. But Burns' work is on one network, 1% of the year. The Murderers of FDR are broadcasting their hate all day everywhere.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orpupilofnature57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-29-09 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. No Doubt , MSM is a tool for the 12% , Ken Burns slows down Kkkarl Rove.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Union Yes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-28-09 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
21. Reauthorize the Fairness Doctrine for F*** SAKE!
Edited on Fri Aug-28-09 05:08 PM by Union Yes
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 04:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC