Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

EPA fails to inform public about weed-killer in drinking water

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-25-09 11:19 AM
Original message
EPA fails to inform public about weed-killer in drinking water

http://www.grist.org/article/2009-08-24-epa-fails-to-inform-public-about-weed-killer-in-drinking-water


One of the nation’s most widely used herbicides has been found to exceed federal safety limits in drinking water in four states, but water customers have not been told and the Environmental Protection Agency has not published the results.

Records that tracked the amount of the weed-killer atrazine in about 150 watersheds from 2003 through 2008 were obtained by the Huffington Post Investigative Fund under the Freedom of Information Act. An analysis found that yearly average levels of atrazine in drinking water violated the federal standard at least ten times in communities in Illinois, Indiana, Ohio, and Kansas, all states where farmers rely heavily on the herbicide.

In addition, more than 40 water systems in those states showed spikes in atrazine levels that normally would have triggered automatic notification of customers. In none of those cases were residents alerted.

-snip saying studies not complete, etc.-

In recent years atrazine has been the subject of intensive debate among scientists about its effects on the reproductive systems of frogs and other vertebrate animals. In some studies, male frogs that were exposed to high levels of atrazine have been documented to grow eggs.

In 2004, the European Union banned atrazine because it was consistently showing up in drinking water and health officials, aware of ongoing studies, said they could not find sufficient evidence the chemical was safe.

-snip-

The EPA and Syngenta negotiated a deal for more extensive monitoring of about 150 vulnerable watersheds. Under that arrangement, the company pays for weekly monitoring and sends the results to the EPA, as well as to the local water companies and most state regulators.

-snip-

In addition, more than 40 water systems in those states showed spikes of atrazine over 12 ppb – which if found in the state quarterly tests would have required the water system to notify the public within 30 days.

In none of those cases were residents notified of the high levels. In fact, the brochures in their water bills – reviewed for this report—contained misleading numbers based on the state testing.

-snip-

The EPA does not consider one-time spikes of atrazine to be dangerous, but several peer-reviewed scientific studies suggest that the chemical may be harmful, particularly to developing fetuses, in doses as low as 0.1 ppb. One study, published this year in the medical journal Acta Paediatrica, found that birth defect rates in the United States were highest for women who conceived during months when atrazine levels were spiking.
-snip-
-----------------------------


reading the snips will show you that the truth is being suppressed

there are so many things a woman has to consider before and during pregnancy to try and insure a healthy baby that it is mind boggling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-25-09 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. The reality is that EPA stopped informing about pesticides in drinking water.
That information was readily available for years, but it remarkably stopped right around 2001. I suppose it had a lot to do with Bush etc refusing to enforce environmental laws (and defunding EPA's enforcement arm); when no one is watching, it's tempting to assume that there will be no consequences for bad behavior.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Henryman Donating Member (187 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-25-09 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. Misleading headline!
If you read the article, you will see that the EPA didn't fail anything. To fail is to "to be unsuccessful in the performance or completion of: He failed to do his duty." The article states that the EPA did not have a duty to report these results. How can an editor let this happen?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-25-09 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. As for the dioxin and abestos in Alabama drinking water
the Alabama Environmental Dept. is " not required" by law to test for or report those levels.
so they don't.

I count that as a failure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Henryman Donating Member (187 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-25-09 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yes, but not EPA's failure. Why...
That's a law-making failure. Also, I don't believe there is any harm caused from asbestos is water. Asbestos is harmful when inhaled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC