Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

O.K., the Birther has replied to my sending him the "BOrn in the USA" graphic!1

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-16-09 12:33 PM
Original message
O.K., the Birther has replied to my sending him the "BOrn in the USA" graphic!1
Edited on Sun Aug-16-09 12:34 PM by UTUSN
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=6313056&mesg_id=6313056

He's a local radio talkshow host, a SECOND one, not the one I've mentioned for years. He's a retired Army officer who calls himself by his officer rank. He's also a Bible-erther, says that the President was not sworn in legitimately because at the SECOND swearing, no Bible was used.

At first, on the radio, he claimed OBAMA had screwed up the oath. Somebody called him on it, informing that jerk ROBERTS messed it up, probably to make the President look bad. So the wingnut readily AGREED, saying, "O.K., what about the SECOND oath?" This means he KNEW he was lying when he said the junk on the air.

I sent him an e-mail spelling out his LIE, with the links that said Chester ARTHER and COOLIDGE had also had a second swearing, no big deal. But he said that the Bible-less oath was BECAUSE (the President) DOESN'T BELIEVE IN THE BIBLE!1

The jerk had mentioned, a couple of times, taking his own oath as an officer. I asked him whether he had used a Bible. He has never answered that, skips around it.

I sent him this:


HIS REPLY************QUOTE*************

Gee (first name), I guess you think it is ok that the President withholds documents concerning his birth, his college transcripts, his Illinois Senate Records, his foreign travel?

You do understand that there is a DOCUMENT in the Hawaii records bureau that has not been released regarding specific information about the Commander in Chief during wartime?

Explain why he can withhold these if you can? Do you think the President of the United States should be allowed to hide documents?

"A person who is hiding something,"has something to hide.

You and every other knee-jerk Obama supporter have been had, as have the American People.

*************UNQUOTE********



I answered this (changes made to de-identify):

You can quit with all of your crap, your personal insults, and calling me a knee-jerk supporter. I am a Democratic party voter. I have seldom had my first pick in the primaries win the top spot for the nomination, but ANY Democratic nominee is SMARTER, more SCRUPULOUS, and more of a public servant than ANY Rethug. So, I am "knee-jerk" in that respect.

There is NOTHING you can say to "convince" me of Birther-ism, or John BIRCH-ism, or militias, Minutemen, SwiftBOTs (as in "RObots," get it?), or any other Nazi CRAP that you spout. Thankfully, you have killed off my listening to your radio station, something that LIMBOsevic and HANNITY, and O'LOOFAH had not been able to do. You still pimp-slapping your sockpuppet (houseboy U.S. Representative; weekly guest)?

Why did you come here from Orange County or wherever---wasn't it Nazi enough over there for you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-16-09 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. BTW
Bush did not release his docs either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-16-09 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Among all the GOVERNMENTAL documents that they probably destroyed!1 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-16-09 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. When my husband's 81 year old Grandfather (a minister) married us....
he got somewhat confused and read the ceremony out of order...

Years later I decided to call the County to make sure
the license was filed and all...I told the registrar that
Grandpa had kinda had trouble getting it all out in the correct order...
She laughed and said "The papers were filed..you're still married"...


Tikki
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-16-09 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. What is the graphic?
Also,he's released his Birth Certificate, but ask him for his and every other politician.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-16-09 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. The graphic is in the O.P. and its Subject title
Edited on Sun Aug-16-09 12:48 PM by UTUSN
Here:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lefthandedlefty Donating Member (247 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-16-09 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. That guy said something about his wartime records
What war were we in in 1961
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-16-09 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. The jerk never answers specifics, always snipes & runs away
& he SANDBAGS. If you totally annhialate one of his gripes, he brings up something else.


I don't know what he's talking about. Whether the CiC (now) in (this) "wartime"?11
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-16-09 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
8. Aren't these jerks strict constitutionalists?
The Constitution forbids 'religious tests' and does not require anyone swear on any religious book. What he is demanding is unconstitutional.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catshrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-16-09 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
9. You can't debate Birf-N-Turf
Debating requires logic and logic requires the ability to think and reason. Those of the Birf-N-Turf movement are not capable of logic and reasoning, nor are they capable of processing evidence that refutes their talking points. It creates cognitive dissonance that requires the ability to, again, reason. Some people are thinkers, some people want others to do the thinking for them and then tell them what to believe. That's why the latter are called sheeple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-16-09 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Yet, I *wonder* at their extraordinary motor mouths. I realize that O'LOOFAH and
Edited on Sun Aug-16-09 02:23 PM by UTUSN
HANNITY and Tweety and all the other Irish Catholic media kids were schooled in rhetoric by the nuns, but I wonder about two things:

* Their truly remarkable verbal skills appear to be hot-wired, skipping the brains, and


* What type of "oral" psychological thing might be in play?


P.S., Cat, please explain your "Birf-N-Turf" deal again for everybody's enjoyment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-16-09 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
11. To tie a ribbon on it!1 He NOW TOLD ME NEVER TO LISTEN TO HIS SHOW AGAIN!1
Edited on Sun Aug-16-09 08:33 PM by UTUSN
Well, first I wrote THIS e-mail to the former owner of the station:

*********TO THE FORMER OWNER*********

What LIMBOsevic, O'REILLY, HANNITY, "Dr" Laura, & BECK were not able to do, these two most ignorant motormouths (Frick) and the military moocher (Frack) have done.

I've been a 20+ yrs listener. The radio on my workplace desk and car were on your station. I remember your line-up back then: Dr Joy BROWNE, the other Michael JACKSON, Dr David VISCOTT, maybe Dr Dean EDELL---people talking sensibly to other people. And I remember when you all started with LIMBOsevic---how SHOCKED I was even just from the opening music, how "unConservative" it was. And I wrote letters back then, before e-mails, which you forwarded to him to answer. As I have long known, only the big advertisers run scared from customer complaints--you people in the media DON'T listen.

Did you see the letter in the (local paper) last week from the nice lady who wondered who and why were "these gentlemen yelling on the radio now?" I heard one of the station's bosses on the military lifer's show last month, pretending to listen to the callers, but bottomline defending the current status quo to the end, claiming that "Air America's failure" (somewhere else) "PROVED" that wingnut radio is the way to go.

So, (former owner), as wingnut as you are and as your erstwhile rants were, you at least show education and class. I have no illusions that my own boycott will matter to anybody but me, but it WILL for me, the same way I am much more at ease in skipping "Mallard Fillmore" and certain other comics: Nobody knows I'm skipping them, but I feel MUCH BETTER. Plus, I take satisfaction that your former station only has a couple of actual listeners.

********END OF MESSAGE TO FORMER OWNER*******



So, The Birther/N-Tirfer (NOT the former owner) replied:

We are done. How dare you call me that.
Please, please do not ever email me or listen to the show again.


***************Well, *I* say, What part of Didn't-I-Just-Say-That was not clear?!1


NOTE TO MY FELLOW VETS: I used the word "MOOCHER" for this dude (and other WINGNUTS) only. He's got total medical benefits but has been barfing two hours per day, five days per week, griping about medical care for everybody else. This is not about my fellow Dem vets. Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 05:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC